2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
# nim-eth - Node Discovery Protocol v5
|
|
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2020 Status Research & Development GmbH
|
|
|
|
# Licensed under either of
|
|
|
|
# * Apache License, version 2.0, (LICENSE-APACHEv2)
|
|
|
|
# * MIT license (LICENSE-MIT)
|
|
|
|
# at your option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed except
|
|
|
|
# according to those terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Node Discovery Protocol v5
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## Node discovery protocol implementation as per specification:
|
|
|
|
## https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/discv5/discv5.md
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## This node discovery protocol implementation uses the same underlying
|
|
|
|
## implementation of routing table as is also used for the discovery v4
|
|
|
|
## implementation, which is the same or similar as the one described in the
|
|
|
|
## original Kademlia paper:
|
|
|
|
## https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/~petar/papers/maymounkov-kademlia-lncs.pdf
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## This might not be the most optimal implementation for the node discovery
|
|
|
|
## protocol v5. Why?
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## The Kademlia paper describes an implementation that starts off from one
|
|
|
|
## k-bucket, and keeps splitting the bucket as more nodes are discovered and
|
|
|
|
## added. The bucket splits only on the part of the binary tree where our own
|
|
|
|
## node its id belongs too (same prefix). Resulting eventually in a k-bucket per
|
|
|
|
## logarithmic distance (log base2 distance). Well, not really, as nodes with
|
|
|
|
## ids in the closer distance ranges will never be found. And because of this an
|
|
|
|
## optimisation is done where buckets will also split sometimes even if the
|
|
|
|
## nodes own id does not have the same prefix (this is to avoid creating highly
|
|
|
|
## unbalanced branches which would require longer lookups).
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## Now, some implementations take a more simplified approach. They just create
|
|
|
|
## directly a bucket for each possible logarithmic distance (e.g. here 1->256).
|
|
|
|
## Some implementations also don't create buckets with logarithmic distance
|
|
|
|
## lower than a certain value (e.g. only 1/15th of the highest buckets),
|
|
|
|
## because the closer to the node (the lower the distance), the less chance
|
|
|
|
## there is to still find nodes.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## The discovery protocol v4 its `FindNode` call will request the k closest
|
|
|
|
## nodes. As does original Kademlia. This effectively puts the work at the node
|
|
|
|
## that gets the request. This node will have to check its buckets and gather
|
|
|
|
## the closest. Some implementations go over all the nodes in all the buckets
|
|
|
|
## for this (e.g. go-ethereum discovery v4). However, in our bucket splitting
|
|
|
|
## approach, this search is improved.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## In the discovery protocol v5 the `FindNode` call is changed and now the
|
|
|
|
## logarithmic distance is passed as parameter instead of the NodeId. And only
|
|
|
|
## nodes that match that logarithmic distance are allowed to be returned.
|
|
|
|
## This change was made to not put the trust at the requested node for selecting
|
|
|
|
## the closest nodes. To counter a possible (mistaken) difference in
|
|
|
|
## implementation, but more importantly for security reasons. See also:
|
|
|
|
## https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/discv5/discv5-rationale.md#115-guard-against-kademlia-implementation-flaws
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## The result is that in an implementation which just stores buckets per
|
|
|
|
## logarithmic distance, it simply needs to return the right bucket. In our
|
|
|
|
## split-bucket implementation, this cannot be done as such and thus the closest
|
|
|
|
## neighbours search is still done. And to do this, a reverse calculation of an
|
|
|
|
## id at given logarithmic distance is needed (which is why there is the
|
|
|
|
## `idAtDistance` proc). Next, nodes with invalid distances need to be filtered
|
|
|
|
## out to be compliant to the specification. This can most likely get further
|
|
|
|
## optimised, but it sounds likely better to switch away from the split-bucket
|
|
|
|
## approach. I believe that the main benefit it has is improved lookups
|
|
|
|
## (due to no unbalanced branches), and it looks like this will be negated by
|
|
|
|
## limiting the returned nodes to only the ones of the requested logarithmic
|
|
|
|
## distance for the `FindNode` call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## This `FindNode` change in discovery v5 will also have an effect on the
|
|
|
|
## efficiency of the network. Work will be moved from the receiver of
|
|
|
|
## `FindNodes` to the requester. But this also means more network traffic,
|
|
|
|
## as less nodes will potentially be passed around per `FindNode` call, and thus
|
|
|
|
## more requests will be needed for a lookup (adding bandwidth and latency).
|
|
|
|
## This might be a concern for mobile devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import
|
|
|
|
std/[tables, sets, options, math, sequtils],
|
|
|
|
stew/shims/net as stewNet, json_serialization/std/net,
|
|
|
|
stew/[byteutils, endians2], chronicles, chronos, stint, bearssl,
|
|
|
|
eth/[rlp, keys, async_utils],
|
|
|
|
typesv1, encodingv1, node, routing_table, enr, random2, sessions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import nimcrypto except toHex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
export options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{.push raises: [Defect].}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
logScope:
|
|
|
|
topics = "discv5"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const
|
|
|
|
alpha = 3 ## Kademlia concurrency factor
|
|
|
|
lookupRequestLimit = 3
|
|
|
|
findNodeResultLimit = 15 # applies in FINDNODE handler
|
|
|
|
maxNodesPerMessage = 3
|
|
|
|
lookupInterval = 60.seconds ## Interval of launching a random lookup to
|
|
|
|
## populate the routing table. go-ethereum seems to do 3 runs every 30
|
|
|
|
## minutes. Trinity starts one every minute.
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
revalidateMax = 10000 ## Revalidation of a peer is done between 0 and this
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
## value in milliseconds
|
|
|
|
handshakeTimeout* = 2.seconds ## timeout for the reply on the
|
|
|
|
## whoareyou message
|
|
|
|
responseTimeout* = 4.seconds ## timeout for the response of a request-response
|
|
|
|
## call
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type
|
|
|
|
Protocol* = ref object
|
|
|
|
transp: DatagramTransport
|
|
|
|
localNode*: Node
|
|
|
|
privateKey: PrivateKey
|
|
|
|
bindAddress: Address ## UDP binding address
|
|
|
|
pendingRequests: Table[AESGCMNonce, PendingRequest]
|
|
|
|
routingTable: RoutingTable
|
|
|
|
codec*: Codec
|
|
|
|
awaitedMessages: Table[(NodeId, RequestId), Future[Option[Message]]]
|
|
|
|
lookupLoop: Future[void]
|
|
|
|
revalidateLoop: Future[void]
|
|
|
|
bootstrapRecords*: seq[Record]
|
|
|
|
rng*: ref BrHmacDrbgContext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PendingRequest = object
|
|
|
|
node: Node
|
|
|
|
message: seq[byte]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DiscResult*[T] = Result[T, cstring]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc addNode*(d: Protocol, node: Node): bool =
|
|
|
|
## Add `Node` to discovery routing table.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## Returns false only if `Node` is not eligable for adding (no Address).
|
|
|
|
if node.address.isSome():
|
|
|
|
# Only add nodes with an address to the routing table
|
|
|
|
discard d.routingTable.addNode(node)
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc addNode*(d: Protocol, r: Record): bool =
|
|
|
|
## Add `Node` from a `Record` to discovery routing table.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## Returns false only if no valid `Node` can be created from the `Record` or
|
|
|
|
## on the conditions of `addNode` from a `Node`.
|
|
|
|
let node = newNode(r)
|
|
|
|
if node.isOk():
|
|
|
|
return d.addNode(node[])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc addNode*(d: Protocol, enr: EnrUri): bool =
|
|
|
|
## Add `Node` from a ENR URI to discovery routing table.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## Returns false if no valid ENR URI, or on the conditions of `addNode` from
|
|
|
|
## an `Record`.
|
|
|
|
var r: Record
|
|
|
|
let res = r.fromUri(enr)
|
|
|
|
if res:
|
|
|
|
return d.addNode(r)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc getNode*(d: Protocol, id: NodeId): Option[Node] =
|
|
|
|
## Get the node with id from the routing table.
|
|
|
|
d.routingTable.getNode(id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc randomNodes*(d: Protocol, maxAmount: int): seq[Node] =
|
|
|
|
## Get a `maxAmount` of random nodes from the local routing table.
|
|
|
|
d.routingTable.randomNodes(maxAmount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc randomNodes*(d: Protocol, maxAmount: int,
|
|
|
|
pred: proc(x: Node): bool {.gcsafe, noSideEffect.}): seq[Node] =
|
|
|
|
## Get a `maxAmount` of random nodes from the local routing table with the
|
|
|
|
## `pred` predicate function applied as filter on the nodes selected.
|
|
|
|
d.routingTable.randomNodes(maxAmount, pred)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc randomNodes*(d: Protocol, maxAmount: int,
|
|
|
|
enrField: (string, seq[byte])): seq[Node] =
|
|
|
|
## Get a `maxAmount` of random nodes from the local routing table. The
|
|
|
|
## the nodes selected are filtered by provided `enrField`.
|
|
|
|
d.randomNodes(maxAmount, proc(x: Node): bool = x.record.contains(enrField))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc neighbours*(d: Protocol, id: NodeId, k: int = BUCKET_SIZE): seq[Node] =
|
|
|
|
## Return up to k neighbours (closest node ids) of the given node id.
|
|
|
|
d.routingTable.neighbours(id, k)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc nodesDiscovered*(d: Protocol): int {.inline.} = d.routingTable.len
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func privKey*(d: Protocol): lent PrivateKey =
|
|
|
|
d.privateKey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func getRecord*(d: Protocol): Record =
|
|
|
|
## Get the ENR of the local node.
|
|
|
|
d.localNode.record
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc updateRecord*(
|
|
|
|
d: Protocol, enrFields: openarray[(string, seq[byte])]): DiscResult[void] =
|
|
|
|
## Update the ENR of the local node with provided `enrFields` k:v pairs.
|
|
|
|
let fields = mapIt(enrFields, toFieldPair(it[0], it[1]))
|
|
|
|
d.localNode.record.update(d.privateKey, fields)
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Would it make sense to actively ping ("broadcast") to all the peers
|
|
|
|
# we stored a handshake with in order to get that ENR updated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc send(d: Protocol, a: Address, data: seq[byte]) =
|
|
|
|
let ta = initTAddress(a.ip, a.port)
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
let f = d.transp.sendTo(ta, data)
|
|
|
|
f.callback = proc(data: pointer) {.gcsafe.} =
|
|
|
|
if f.failed:
|
|
|
|
# Could be `TransportUseClosedError` in case the transport is already
|
|
|
|
# closed, or could be `TransportOsError` in case of a socket error.
|
|
|
|
# In the latter case this would probably mostly occur if the network
|
|
|
|
# interface underneath gets disconnected or similar.
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Should this kind of error be propagated upwards? Probably, but
|
|
|
|
# it should not stop the process as that would reset the discovery
|
|
|
|
# progress in case there is even a small window of no connection.
|
|
|
|
# One case that needs this error available upwards is when revalidating
|
|
|
|
# nodes. Else the revalidation might end up clearing the routing tabl
|
|
|
|
# because of ping failures due to own network connection failure.
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
warn "Discovery send failed", msg = f.readError.msg
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
except Exception as e:
|
|
|
|
# TODO: General exception still being raised from Chronos, but in practice
|
|
|
|
# all CatchableErrors should be grabbed by the above `f.failed`.
|
|
|
|
if e of Defect:
|
|
|
|
raise (ref Defect)(e)
|
|
|
|
else: doAssert(false)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc send(d: Protocol, n: Node, data: seq[byte]) =
|
|
|
|
doAssert(n.address.isSome())
|
|
|
|
d.send(n.address.get(), data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc sendNodes(d: Protocol, toId: NodeId, toAddr: Address, reqId: RequestId,
|
|
|
|
nodes: openarray[Node]) =
|
|
|
|
proc sendNodes(d: Protocol, toId: NodeId, toAddr: Address,
|
|
|
|
message: NodesMessage, reqId: RequestId) {.nimcall.} =
|
|
|
|
let (data, _) = encodeMessagePacket(d.rng[], d.codec, toId, toAddr,
|
|
|
|
encodeMessage(message, reqId))
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Respond message packet", dstId = toId, address = toAddr,
|
|
|
|
kind = MessageKind.nodes
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
d.send(toAddr, data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if nodes.len == 0:
|
|
|
|
# In case of 0 nodes, a reply is still needed
|
|
|
|
d.sendNodes(toId, toAddr, NodesMessage(total: 1, enrs: @[]), reqId)
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var message: NodesMessage
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Do the total calculation based on the max UDP packet size we want to
|
|
|
|
# send and the ENR size of all (max 16) nodes.
|
|
|
|
# Which UDP packet size to take? 1280? 576?
|
|
|
|
message.total = ceil(nodes.len / maxNodesPerMessage).uint32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i in 0 ..< nodes.len:
|
|
|
|
message.enrs.add(nodes[i].record)
|
|
|
|
if message.enrs.len == maxNodesPerMessage:
|
|
|
|
d.sendNodes(toId, toAddr, message, reqId)
|
|
|
|
message.enrs.setLen(0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if message.enrs.len != 0:
|
|
|
|
d.sendNodes(toId, toAddr, message, reqId)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc handlePing(d: Protocol, fromId: NodeId, fromAddr: Address,
|
|
|
|
ping: PingMessage, reqId: RequestId) =
|
|
|
|
let a = fromAddr
|
|
|
|
var pong: PongMessage
|
|
|
|
pong.enrSeq = d.localNode.record.seqNum
|
|
|
|
pong.ip = case a.ip.family
|
|
|
|
of IpAddressFamily.IPv4: @(a.ip.address_v4)
|
|
|
|
of IpAddressFamily.IPv6: @(a.ip.address_v6)
|
|
|
|
pong.port = a.port.uint16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (data, _) = encodeMessagePacket(d.rng[], d.codec, fromId, fromAddr,
|
|
|
|
encodeMessage(pong, reqId))
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Respond message packet", dstId = fromId, address = fromAddr,
|
|
|
|
kind = MessageKind.pong
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
d.send(fromAddr, data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc handleFindNode(d: Protocol, fromId: NodeId, fromAddr: Address,
|
|
|
|
fn: FindNodeMessage, reqId: RequestId) =
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
if fn.distances.len == 0:
|
|
|
|
d.sendNodes(fromId, fromAddr, reqId, [])
|
|
|
|
elif fn.distances.contains(0):
|
|
|
|
# A request for our own record.
|
|
|
|
# It would be a weird request if there are more distances next to 0
|
|
|
|
# requested, so in this case lets just pass only our own. TODO: OK?
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
d.sendNodes(fromId, fromAddr, reqId, [d.localNode])
|
|
|
|
else:
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
# TODO: Still deduplicate also?
|
|
|
|
if fn.distances.all(proc (x: uint32): bool = return x <= 256):
|
|
|
|
d.sendNodes(fromId, fromAddr, reqId,
|
|
|
|
d.routingTable.neighboursAtDistances(fn.distances, seenOnly = true))
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
# At least one invalid distance, but the polite node we are, still respond
|
|
|
|
# with empty nodes.
|
|
|
|
d.sendNodes(fromId, fromAddr, reqId, [])
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-01 09:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
proc handleTalkReq(d: Protocol, fromId: NodeId, fromAddr: Address,
|
|
|
|
talkreq: TalkReqMessage, reqId: RequestId) =
|
|
|
|
# No support for any protocol yet so an empty response is send as per
|
|
|
|
# specification.
|
|
|
|
let talkresp = TalkRespMessage(response: @[])
|
|
|
|
let (data, _) = encodeMessagePacket(d.rng[], d.codec, fromId, fromAddr,
|
|
|
|
encodeMessage(talkresp, reqId))
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Respond message packet", dstId = fromId, address = fromAddr,
|
|
|
|
kind = MessageKind.talkresp
|
2020-10-01 09:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
d.send(fromAddr, data)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
proc handleMessage(d: Protocol, srcId: NodeId, fromAddr: Address,
|
|
|
|
message: Message) {.raises:[Exception].} =
|
|
|
|
case message.kind
|
|
|
|
of ping:
|
|
|
|
d.handlePing(srcId, fromAddr, message.ping, message.reqId)
|
|
|
|
of findNode:
|
|
|
|
d.handleFindNode(srcId, fromAddr, message.findNode, message.reqId)
|
2020-10-01 09:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
of talkreq:
|
|
|
|
d.handleTalkReq(srcId, fromAddr, message.talkreq, message.reqId)
|
|
|
|
of regtopic, topicquery:
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Received unimplemented message kind", kind = message.kind,
|
2020-10-01 09:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
origin = fromAddr
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
var waiter: Future[Option[Message]]
|
|
|
|
if d.awaitedMessages.take((srcId, message.reqId), waiter):
|
|
|
|
waiter.complete(some(message)) # TODO: raises: [Exception]
|
|
|
|
else:
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Timed out or unrequested message", kind = message.kind,
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
origin = fromAddr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc sendWhoareyou(d: Protocol, toId: NodeId, a: Address,
|
|
|
|
requestNonce: AESGCMNonce, node: Option[Node]) {.raises: [Exception].} =
|
2020-10-05 11:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
let key = HandShakeKey(nodeId: toId, address: $a)
|
|
|
|
if not d.codec.hasHandshake(key):
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
recordSeq = if node.isSome(): node.get().record.seqNum
|
|
|
|
else: 0
|
|
|
|
pubkey = if node.isSome(): some(node.get().pubkey)
|
|
|
|
else: none(PublicKey)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let data = encodeWhoareyouPacket(d.rng[], d.codec, toId, a, requestNonce,
|
|
|
|
recordSeq, pubkey)
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
sleepAsync(handshakeTimeout).addCallback() do(data: pointer):
|
|
|
|
# TODO: should we still provide cancellation in case handshake completes
|
|
|
|
# correctly?
|
|
|
|
d.codec.handshakes.del(key)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Send whoareyou", dstId = toId, address = a
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
d.send(a, data)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
debug "Node with this id already has ongoing handshake, ignoring packet"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc receive*(d: Protocol, a: Address, packet: openArray[byte]) {.gcsafe,
|
|
|
|
raises: [
|
|
|
|
Defect,
|
|
|
|
# This just comes now from a future.complete() and `sendWhoareyou` which
|
|
|
|
# has it because of `sleepAsync` with `addCallback`, but practically, no
|
|
|
|
# CatchableError should be raised here, we just can't enforce it for now.
|
|
|
|
Exception
|
|
|
|
].} =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let decoded = d.codec.decodePacket(a, packet)
|
|
|
|
if decoded.isOk:
|
|
|
|
let packet = decoded[]
|
|
|
|
case packet.flag
|
|
|
|
of OrdinaryMessage:
|
|
|
|
if packet.messageOpt.isSome():
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
let message = packet.messageOpt.get()
|
|
|
|
trace "Received message packet", srcId = packet.srcId, address = a,
|
|
|
|
kind = message.kind
|
|
|
|
d.handleMessage(packet.srcId, a, message)
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
else:
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Not decryptable message packet received",
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
srcId = packet.srcId, address = a
|
|
|
|
d.sendWhoareyou(packet.srcId, a, packet.requestNonce,
|
|
|
|
d.getNode(packet.srcId))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Flag.Whoareyou:
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Received whoareyou packet", address = a
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
var pr: PendingRequest
|
|
|
|
if d.pendingRequests.take(packet.whoareyou.requestNonce, pr):
|
|
|
|
let toNode = pr.node
|
|
|
|
# This is a node we previously contacted and thus must have an address.
|
|
|
|
doAssert(toNode.address.isSome())
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
let address = toNode.address.get()
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
let data = encodeHandshakePacket(d.rng[], d.codec, toNode.id,
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
address, pr.message, packet.whoareyou, toNode.pubkey)
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Send handshake message packet", dstId = toNode.id, address
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
d.send(toNode, data)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
debug "Timed out or unrequested whoareyou packet", address = a
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
of HandshakeMessage:
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Received handshake message packet", srcId = packet.srcIdHs,
|
|
|
|
address = a, kind = packet.message.kind
|
2020-10-05 11:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
d.handleMessage(packet.srcIdHs, a, packet.message)
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
# For a handshake message it is possible that we received an newer ENR.
|
|
|
|
# In that case we can add/update it to the routing table.
|
|
|
|
if packet.node.isSome():
|
|
|
|
let node = packet.node.get()
|
|
|
|
# Not filling table with nodes without correct IP in the ENR
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Should we care about this???
|
|
|
|
if node.address.isSome() and a == node.address.get():
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
debug "Adding new node to routing table", node
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
discard d.addNode(node)
|
2020-10-08 10:08:36 +00:00
|
|
|
else:
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
debug "Packet decoding error", error = decoded.error, address = a
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Not sure why but need to pop the raises here as it is apparently not
|
|
|
|
# enough to put it in the raises pragma of `processClient` and other async procs.
|
|
|
|
{.pop.}
|
|
|
|
# Next, below there is no more effort done in catching the general `Exception`
|
|
|
|
# as async procs always require `Exception` in the raises pragma, see also:
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/status-im/nim-chronos/issues/98
|
|
|
|
# So I don't bother for now and just add them in the raises pragma until this
|
|
|
|
# gets fixed. It does not mean that we expect these calls to be raising
|
|
|
|
# CatchableErrors, in fact, we really don't, but hey, they might, considering we
|
|
|
|
# can't enforce it.
|
|
|
|
proc processClient(transp: DatagramTransport, raddr: TransportAddress):
|
|
|
|
Future[void] {.async, gcsafe, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
let proto = getUserData[Protocol](transp)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO: should we use `peekMessage()` to avoid allocation?
|
|
|
|
# TODO: This can still raise general `Exception` while it probably should
|
|
|
|
# only give TransportOsError.
|
|
|
|
let buf = try: transp.getMessage()
|
|
|
|
except TransportOsError as e:
|
|
|
|
# This is likely to be local network connection issues.
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
warn "Transport getMessage", exception = e.name, msg = e.msg
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
except Exception as e:
|
|
|
|
if e of Defect:
|
|
|
|
raise (ref Defect)(e)
|
|
|
|
else: doAssert(false)
|
|
|
|
return # Make compiler happy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let ip = try: raddr.address()
|
|
|
|
except ValueError as e:
|
|
|
|
error "Not a valid IpAddress", exception = e.name, msg = e.msg
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
let a = Address(ip: ValidIpAddress.init(ip), port: raddr.port)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
proto.receive(a, buf)
|
|
|
|
except Exception as e:
|
|
|
|
if e of Defect:
|
|
|
|
raise (ref Defect)(e)
|
|
|
|
else: doAssert(false)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc validIp(sender, address: IpAddress): bool {.raises: [Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
s = initTAddress(sender, Port(0))
|
|
|
|
a = initTAddress(address, Port(0))
|
|
|
|
if a.isAnyLocal():
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
if a.isMulticast():
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
if a.isLoopback() and not s.isLoopback():
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
if a.isSiteLocal() and not s.isSiteLocal():
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Also check for special reserved ip addresses:
|
|
|
|
# https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/iana-ipv4-special-registry.xhtml
|
|
|
|
# https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc replaceNode(d: Protocol, n: Node) =
|
|
|
|
if n.record notin d.bootstrapRecords:
|
|
|
|
d.routingTable.replaceNode(n)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
# For now we never remove bootstrap nodes. It might make sense to actually
|
|
|
|
# do so and to retry them only in case we drop to a really low amount of
|
|
|
|
# peers in the routing table.
|
|
|
|
debug "Message request to bootstrap node failed", enr = toURI(n.record)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO: This could be improved to do the clean-up immediatily in case a non
|
|
|
|
# whoareyou response does arrive, but we would need to store the AuthTag
|
|
|
|
# somewhere
|
|
|
|
proc registerRequest(d: Protocol, n: Node, message: seq[byte],
|
|
|
|
nonce: AESGCMNonce) {.raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
let request = PendingRequest(node: n, message: message)
|
|
|
|
if not d.pendingRequests.hasKeyOrPut(nonce, request):
|
|
|
|
# TODO: raises: [Exception]
|
|
|
|
sleepAsync(responseTimeout).addCallback() do(data: pointer):
|
|
|
|
d.pendingRequests.del(nonce)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc waitMessage(d: Protocol, fromNode: Node, reqId: RequestId):
|
|
|
|
Future[Option[Message]] {.raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
result = newFuture[Option[Message]]("waitMessage")
|
|
|
|
let res = result
|
|
|
|
let key = (fromNode.id, reqId)
|
|
|
|
# TODO: raises: [Exception]
|
|
|
|
sleepAsync(responseTimeout).addCallback() do(data: pointer):
|
|
|
|
d.awaitedMessages.del(key)
|
|
|
|
if not res.finished:
|
|
|
|
res.complete(none(Message)) # TODO: raises: [Exception]
|
|
|
|
d.awaitedMessages[key] = result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc verifyNodesRecords*(enrs: openarray[Record], fromNode: Node,
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
distances: varargs[uint32]): seq[Node] {.raises: [Defect].} =
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
## Verify and convert ENRs to a sequence of nodes. Only ENRs that pass
|
|
|
|
## verification will be added. ENRs are verified for duplicates, invalid
|
|
|
|
## addresses and invalid distances.
|
|
|
|
# TODO:
|
|
|
|
# - Should we fail and ignore values on first invalid Node?
|
|
|
|
# - Should we limit the amount of nodes? The discovery v5 specification holds
|
|
|
|
# no limit on the amount that can be returned.
|
|
|
|
var seen: HashSet[Node]
|
|
|
|
for r in enrs:
|
|
|
|
let node = newNode(r)
|
|
|
|
if node.isOk():
|
|
|
|
let n = node.get()
|
|
|
|
# Check for duplicates in the nodes reply. Duplicates are checked based
|
|
|
|
# on node id.
|
|
|
|
if n in seen:
|
|
|
|
trace "Nodes reply contained records with duplicate node ids",
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
record = n.record.toURI, id = n.id, sender = fromNode.record.toURI
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
# Check if the node has an address and if the address is public or from
|
|
|
|
# the same local network or lo network as the sender. The latter allows
|
|
|
|
# for local testing.
|
|
|
|
if not n.address.isSome() or not
|
|
|
|
validIp(fromNode.address.get().ip, n.address.get().ip):
|
|
|
|
trace "Nodes reply contained record with invalid ip-address",
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
record = n.record.toURI, node = n, sender = fromNode.record.toURI
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
continue
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
# Check if returned node has one of the requested distances.
|
|
|
|
if not distances.contains(logDist(n.id, fromNode.id)):
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
warn "Nodes reply contained record with incorrect distance",
|
|
|
|
record = n.record.toURI, sender = fromNode.record.toURI
|
|
|
|
continue
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
# No check on UDP port and thus any port is allowed, also the so called
|
|
|
|
# "well-known" ports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seen.incl(n)
|
|
|
|
result.add(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc waitNodes(d: Protocol, fromNode: Node, reqId: RequestId):
|
|
|
|
Future[DiscResult[seq[Record]]] {.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
## Wait for one or more nodes replies.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## The first reply will hold the total number of replies expected, and based
|
|
|
|
## on that, more replies will be awaited.
|
|
|
|
## If one reply is lost here (timed out), others are ignored too.
|
|
|
|
## Same counts for out of order receival.
|
|
|
|
var op = await d.waitMessage(fromNode, reqId)
|
|
|
|
if op.isSome and op.get.kind == nodes:
|
|
|
|
var res = op.get.nodes.enrs
|
|
|
|
let total = op.get.nodes.total
|
|
|
|
for i in 1 ..< total:
|
|
|
|
op = await d.waitMessage(fromNode, reqId)
|
|
|
|
if op.isSome and op.get.kind == nodes:
|
|
|
|
res.add(op.get.nodes.enrs)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
# No error on this as we received some nodes.
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
return ok(res)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
return err("Nodes message not received in time")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc sendMessage*[T: SomeMessage](d: Protocol, toNode: Node, m: T):
|
|
|
|
RequestId {.raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
doAssert(toNode.address.isSome())
|
|
|
|
let
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
address = toNode.address.get()
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
reqId = RequestId.init(d.rng[])
|
|
|
|
message = encodeMessage(m, reqId)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (data, nonce) = encodeMessagePacket(d.rng[], d.codec, toNode.id,
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
address, message)
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d.registerRequest(toNode, message, nonce)
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Send message packet", dstId = toNode.id, address, kind = messageKind(T)
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
d.send(toNode, data)
|
|
|
|
return reqId
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc ping*(d: Protocol, toNode: Node):
|
|
|
|
Future[DiscResult[PongMessage]] {.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
## Send a discovery ping message.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## Returns the received pong message or an error.
|
|
|
|
let reqId = d.sendMessage(toNode,
|
|
|
|
PingMessage(enrSeq: d.localNode.record.seqNum))
|
|
|
|
let resp = await d.waitMessage(toNode, reqId)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if resp.isSome() and resp.get().kind == pong:
|
|
|
|
d.routingTable.setJustSeen(toNode)
|
|
|
|
return ok(resp.get().pong)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
d.replaceNode(toNode)
|
|
|
|
return err("Pong message not received in time")
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
proc findNode*(d: Protocol, toNode: Node, distances: seq[uint32]):
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Future[DiscResult[seq[Node]]] {.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
## Send a discovery findNode message.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## Returns the received nodes or an error.
|
|
|
|
## Received ENRs are already validated and converted to `Node`.
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
let reqId = d.sendMessage(toNode, FindNodeMessage(distances: distances))
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
let nodes = await d.waitNodes(toNode, reqId)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if nodes.isOk:
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
let res = verifyNodesRecords(nodes.get(), toNode, distances)
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
d.routingTable.setJustSeen(toNode)
|
|
|
|
return ok(res)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
d.replaceNode(toNode)
|
|
|
|
return err(nodes.error)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-01 09:10:06 +00:00
|
|
|
proc talkreq*(d: Protocol, toNode: Node, protocol, request: seq[byte]):
|
|
|
|
Future[DiscResult[TalkRespMessage]] {.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
## Send a discovery talkreq message.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## Returns the received talkresp message or an error.
|
|
|
|
let reqId = d.sendMessage(toNode,
|
|
|
|
TalkReqMessage(protocol: protocol, request: request))
|
|
|
|
let resp = await d.waitMessage(toNode, reqId)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if resp.isSome() and resp.get().kind == talkresp:
|
|
|
|
d.routingTable.setJustSeen(toNode)
|
|
|
|
return ok(resp.get().talkresp)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
d.replaceNode(toNode)
|
|
|
|
return err("Talk response message not received in time")
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
proc lookupDistances(target, dest: NodeId): seq[uint32] {.raises: [Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
let td = logDist(target, dest)
|
|
|
|
result.add(td)
|
|
|
|
var i = 1'u32
|
|
|
|
while result.len < lookupRequestLimit:
|
|
|
|
if td + i < 256:
|
|
|
|
result.add(td + i)
|
|
|
|
if td - i > 0'u32:
|
|
|
|
result.add(td - i)
|
|
|
|
inc i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc lookupWorker(d: Protocol, destNode: Node, target: NodeId):
|
|
|
|
Future[seq[Node]] {.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
let dists = lookupDistances(target, destNode.id)
|
|
|
|
var i = 0
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
# TODO: We can make use of the multiple distances here now.
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
while i < lookupRequestLimit and result.len < findNodeResultLimit:
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
let r = await d.findNode(destNode, @[dists[i]])
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
# TODO: Handle failures better. E.g. stop on different failures than timeout
|
|
|
|
if r.isOk:
|
|
|
|
# TODO: I guess it makes sense to limit here also to `findNodeResultLimit`?
|
|
|
|
result.add(r[])
|
|
|
|
inc i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for n in result:
|
|
|
|
discard d.routingTable.addNode(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc lookup*(d: Protocol, target: NodeId): Future[seq[Node]]
|
|
|
|
{.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
## Perform a lookup for the given target, return the closest n nodes to the
|
|
|
|
## target. Maximum value for n is `BUCKET_SIZE`.
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Sort the returned nodes on distance
|
|
|
|
# Also use unseen nodes as a form of validation.
|
|
|
|
result = d.routingTable.neighbours(target, BUCKET_SIZE, seenOnly = false)
|
|
|
|
var asked = initHashSet[NodeId]()
|
|
|
|
asked.incl(d.localNode.id)
|
|
|
|
var seen = asked
|
|
|
|
for node in result:
|
|
|
|
seen.incl(node.id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var pendingQueries = newSeqOfCap[Future[seq[Node]]](alpha)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while true:
|
|
|
|
var i = 0
|
|
|
|
while i < result.len and pendingQueries.len < alpha:
|
|
|
|
let n = result[i]
|
|
|
|
if not asked.containsOrIncl(n.id):
|
|
|
|
pendingQueries.add(d.lookupWorker(n, target))
|
|
|
|
inc i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trace "discv5 pending queries", total = pendingQueries.len
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if pendingQueries.len == 0:
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let idx = await oneIndex(pendingQueries)
|
|
|
|
trace "Got discv5 lookup response", idx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let nodes = pendingQueries[idx].read
|
|
|
|
pendingQueries.del(idx)
|
|
|
|
for n in nodes:
|
|
|
|
if not seen.containsOrIncl(n.id):
|
|
|
|
if result.len < BUCKET_SIZE:
|
|
|
|
result.add(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc lookupRandom*(d: Protocol): Future[seq[Node]]
|
|
|
|
{.async, raises:[Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
## Perform a lookup for a random target, return the closest n nodes to the
|
|
|
|
## target. Maximum value for n is `BUCKET_SIZE`.
|
|
|
|
var id: NodeId
|
|
|
|
var buf: array[sizeof(id), byte]
|
|
|
|
brHmacDrbgGenerate(d.rng[], buf)
|
|
|
|
copyMem(addr id, addr buf[0], sizeof(id))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return await d.lookup(id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc resolve*(d: Protocol, id: NodeId): Future[Option[Node]]
|
|
|
|
{.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
## Resolve a `Node` based on provided `NodeId`.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
|
|
## This will first look in the own routing table. If the node is known, it
|
|
|
|
## will try to contact if for newer information. If node is not known or it
|
|
|
|
## does not reply, a lookup is done to see if it can find a (newer) record of
|
|
|
|
## the node on the network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let node = d.getNode(id)
|
|
|
|
if node.isSome():
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
let request = await d.findNode(node.get(), @[0'u32])
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Handle failures better. E.g. stop on different failures than timeout
|
|
|
|
if request.isOk() and request[].len > 0:
|
|
|
|
return some(request[][0])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let discovered = await d.lookup(id)
|
|
|
|
for n in discovered:
|
|
|
|
if n.id == id:
|
|
|
|
if node.isSome() and node.get().record.seqNum >= n.record.seqNum:
|
|
|
|
return node
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
return some(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return node
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc revalidateNode*(d: Protocol, n: Node)
|
|
|
|
{.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} = # TODO: Exception
|
|
|
|
let pong = await d.ping(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if pong.isOK():
|
|
|
|
if pong.get().enrSeq > n.record.seqNum:
|
|
|
|
# Request new ENR
|
2020-09-30 09:26:06 +00:00
|
|
|
let nodes = await d.findNode(n, @[0'u32])
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
if nodes.isOk() and nodes[].len > 0:
|
|
|
|
discard d.addNode(nodes[][0])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc revalidateLoop(d: Protocol) {.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
# TODO: General Exception raised.
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
while true:
|
|
|
|
await sleepAsync(milliseconds(d.rng[].rand(revalidateMax)))
|
|
|
|
let n = d.routingTable.nodeToRevalidate()
|
|
|
|
if not n.isNil:
|
|
|
|
traceAsyncErrors d.revalidateNode(n)
|
|
|
|
except CancelledError:
|
|
|
|
trace "revalidateLoop canceled"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc lookupLoop(d: Protocol) {.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
# TODO: General Exception raised.
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
# lookup self (neighbour nodes)
|
|
|
|
let selfLookup = await d.lookup(d.localNode.id)
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Discovered nodes in self lookup", nodes = selfLookup
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
while true:
|
|
|
|
let randomLookup = await d.lookupRandom()
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
trace "Discovered nodes in random lookup", nodes = randomLookup
|
|
|
|
debug "Total nodes in discv5 routing table", total = d.routingTable.len()
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
await sleepAsync(lookupInterval)
|
|
|
|
except CancelledError:
|
|
|
|
trace "lookupLoop canceled"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc newProtocol*(privKey: PrivateKey,
|
|
|
|
externalIp: Option[ValidIpAddress], tcpPort, udpPort: Port,
|
|
|
|
localEnrFields: openarray[(string, seq[byte])] = [],
|
|
|
|
bootstrapRecords: openarray[Record] = [],
|
|
|
|
previousRecord = none[enr.Record](),
|
|
|
|
bindIp = IPv4_any(), rng = newRng()):
|
|
|
|
Protocol {.raises: [Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
# TODO: Tried adding bindPort = udpPort as parameter but that gave
|
|
|
|
# "Error: internal error: environment misses: udpPort" in nim-beacon-chain.
|
|
|
|
# Anyhow, nim-beacon-chain would also require some changes to support port
|
|
|
|
# remapping through NAT and this API is also subject to change once we
|
|
|
|
# introduce support for ipv4 + ipv6 binding/listening.
|
|
|
|
let extraFields = mapIt(localEnrFields, toFieldPair(it[0], it[1]))
|
|
|
|
# TODO:
|
|
|
|
# - Defect as is now or return a result for enr errors?
|
|
|
|
# - In case incorrect key, allow for new enr based on new key (new node id)?
|
|
|
|
var record: Record
|
|
|
|
if previousRecord.isSome():
|
|
|
|
record = previousRecord.get()
|
|
|
|
record.update(privKey, externalIp, tcpPort, udpPort,
|
|
|
|
extraFields).expect("Record within size limits and correct key")
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
record = enr.Record.init(1, privKey, externalIp, tcpPort, udpPort,
|
|
|
|
extraFields).expect("Record within size limits")
|
|
|
|
let node = newNode(record).expect("Properly initialized record")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# TODO Consider whether this should be a Defect
|
|
|
|
doAssert rng != nil, "RNG initialization failed"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
result = Protocol(
|
|
|
|
privateKey: privKey,
|
|
|
|
localNode: node,
|
|
|
|
bindAddress: Address(ip: ValidIpAddress.init(bindIp), port: udpPort),
|
|
|
|
codec: Codec(localNode: node, privKey: privKey,
|
|
|
|
sessions: Sessions.init(256)),
|
|
|
|
bootstrapRecords: @bootstrapRecords,
|
|
|
|
rng: rng)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
result.routingTable.init(node, 5, rng)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc open*(d: Protocol) {.raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
info "Starting discovery node", node = d.localNode,
|
|
|
|
bindAddress = d.bindAddress, uri = toURI(d.localNode.record)
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
# TODO allow binding to specific IP / IPv6 / etc
|
|
|
|
let ta = initTAddress(d.bindAddress.ip, d.bindAddress.port)
|
|
|
|
# TODO: raises `OSError` and `IOSelectorsException`, the latter which is
|
|
|
|
# object of Exception. In Nim devel this got changed to CatchableError.
|
|
|
|
d.transp = newDatagramTransport(processClient, udata = d, local = ta)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for record in d.bootstrapRecords:
|
|
|
|
debug "Adding bootstrap node", uri = toURI(record)
|
|
|
|
discard d.addNode(record)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc start*(d: Protocol) {.raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
d.lookupLoop = lookupLoop(d)
|
|
|
|
d.revalidateLoop = revalidateLoop(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc close*(d: Protocol) {.raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
doAssert(not d.transp.closed)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
debug "Closing discovery node", node = d.localNode
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
if not d.revalidateLoop.isNil:
|
|
|
|
d.revalidateLoop.cancel()
|
|
|
|
if not d.lookupLoop.isNil:
|
|
|
|
d.lookupLoop.cancel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d.transp.close()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc closeWait*(d: Protocol) {.async, raises: [Exception, Defect].} =
|
|
|
|
doAssert(not d.transp.closed)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-23 14:41:44 +00:00
|
|
|
debug "Closing discovery node", node = d.localNode
|
2020-09-25 09:44:34 +00:00
|
|
|
if not d.revalidateLoop.isNil:
|
|
|
|
await d.revalidateLoop.cancelAndWait()
|
|
|
|
if not d.lookupLoop.isNil:
|
|
|
|
await d.lookupLoop.cancelAndWait()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await d.transp.closeWait()
|