[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
import std/random
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
import std/sequtils
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
import pkg/questionable
|
|
|
|
import pkg/questionable/results
|
|
|
|
import pkg/chronos
|
|
|
|
import pkg/datastore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import pkg/codex/stores
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
import pkg/codex/errors
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
import pkg/codex/sales
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
import pkg/codex/utils/json
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-01-29 20:03:51 +00:00
|
|
|
import ../../asynctest
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
import ../examples
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
import ../helpers
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
const CONCURRENCY_TESTS_COUNT = 1000
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-22 18:01:21 +00:00
|
|
|
asyncchecksuite "Reservations module":
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
var
|
|
|
|
repo: RepoStore
|
|
|
|
repoDs: Datastore
|
2024-05-30 06:57:10 +00:00
|
|
|
metaDs: Datastore
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
reservations: Reservations
|
2024-05-30 06:57:10 +00:00
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
repoTmp = TempLevelDb.new()
|
|
|
|
metaTmp = TempLevelDb.new()
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setup:
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
randomize(1.int64) # create reproducible results
|
2024-05-30 06:57:10 +00:00
|
|
|
repoDs = repoTmp.newDb()
|
|
|
|
metaDs = metaTmp.newDb()
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
repo = RepoStore.new(repoDs, metaDs)
|
|
|
|
reservations = Reservations.new(repo)
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-05-30 06:57:10 +00:00
|
|
|
teardown:
|
|
|
|
await repoTmp.destroyDb()
|
|
|
|
await metaTmp.destroyDb()
|
|
|
|
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
proc createAvailability(): Availability =
|
|
|
|
let example = Availability.example
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
let totalSize = rand(100000..200000)
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let availability = waitFor reservations.createAvailability(
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
totalSize.u256,
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
example.duration,
|
|
|
|
example.minPrice,
|
|
|
|
example.maxCollateral
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return availability.get
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proc createReservation(availability: Availability): Reservation =
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
let size = rand(1..<availability.freeSize.truncate(int))
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let reservation = waitFor reservations.createReservation(
|
|
|
|
availability.id,
|
|
|
|
size.u256,
|
|
|
|
RequestId.example,
|
|
|
|
UInt256.example
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return reservation.get
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "availability can be serialised and deserialised":
|
|
|
|
let availability = Availability.example
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let serialised = %availability
|
|
|
|
check Availability.fromJson(serialised).get == availability
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "has no availability initially":
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
check (await reservations.all(Availability)).get.len == 0
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "generates unique ids for storage availability":
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
let availability1 = Availability.init(1.u256, 2.u256, 3.u256, 4.u256, 5.u256)
|
|
|
|
let availability2 = Availability.init(1.u256, 2.u256, 3.u256, 4.u256, 5.u256)
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
check availability1.id != availability2.id
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "can reserve available storage":
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
check availability.id != AvailabilityId.default
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "creating availability reserves bytes in repo":
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
let orig = repo.available.uint
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
check repo.available.uint == (orig.u256 - availability.freeSize).truncate(uint)
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "can get all availabilities":
|
|
|
|
let availability1 = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let availability2 = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let availabilities = !(await reservations.all(Availability))
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
check:
|
|
|
|
# perform unordered checks
|
|
|
|
availabilities.len == 2
|
|
|
|
availabilities.contains(availability1)
|
|
|
|
availabilities.contains(availability2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "reserved availability exists":
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-11-17 12:49:45 +00:00
|
|
|
let exists = await reservations.exists(availability.key.get)
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check exists
|
|
|
|
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
test "reservation can be created":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
|
|
|
check reservation.id != ReservationId.default
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "can get all reservations":
|
|
|
|
let availability1 = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let availability2 = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation1 = createReservation(availability1)
|
|
|
|
let reservation2 = createReservation(availability2)
|
|
|
|
let availabilities = !(await reservations.all(Availability))
|
|
|
|
let reservations = !(await reservations.all(Reservation))
|
|
|
|
check:
|
|
|
|
# perform unordered checks
|
|
|
|
availabilities.len == 2
|
|
|
|
reservations.len == 2
|
|
|
|
reservations.contains(reservation1)
|
|
|
|
reservations.contains(reservation2)
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
test "can get reservations of specific availability":
|
|
|
|
let availability1 = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let availability2 = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation1 = createReservation(availability1)
|
|
|
|
let reservation2 = createReservation(availability2)
|
|
|
|
let reservations = !(await reservations.all(Reservation, availability1.id))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check:
|
|
|
|
# perform unordered checks
|
|
|
|
reservations.len == 1
|
|
|
|
reservations.contains(reservation1)
|
|
|
|
not reservations.contains(reservation2)
|
|
|
|
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
test "cannot create reservation with non-existant availability":
|
|
|
|
let availability = Availability.example
|
|
|
|
let created = await reservations.createReservation(
|
|
|
|
availability.id,
|
|
|
|
UInt256.example,
|
|
|
|
RequestId.example,
|
|
|
|
UInt256.example
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
check created.isErr
|
|
|
|
check created.error of NotExistsError
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "cannot create reservation larger than availability size":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let created = await reservations.createReservation(
|
|
|
|
availability.id,
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
availability.totalSize + 1,
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
RequestId.example,
|
|
|
|
UInt256.example
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
check created.isErr
|
|
|
|
check created.error of BytesOutOfBoundsError
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
test "cannot create reservation larger than availability size - concurrency test":
|
|
|
|
proc concurrencyTest(): Future[void] {.async.} =
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let one = reservations.createReservation(
|
|
|
|
availability.id,
|
|
|
|
availability.totalSize - 1,
|
|
|
|
RequestId.example,
|
|
|
|
UInt256.example
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let two = reservations.createReservation(
|
|
|
|
availability.id,
|
|
|
|
availability.totalSize,
|
|
|
|
RequestId.example,
|
|
|
|
UInt256.example
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let oneResult = await one
|
|
|
|
let twoResult = await two
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check oneResult.isErr or twoResult.isErr
|
|
|
|
if oneResult.isErr:
|
|
|
|
check oneResult.error of BytesOutOfBoundsError
|
|
|
|
if twoResult.isErr:
|
|
|
|
check twoResult.error of BytesOutOfBoundsError
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var futures: seq[Future[void]]
|
|
|
|
for _ in 1..CONCURRENCY_TESTS_COUNT:
|
|
|
|
futures.add(concurrencyTest())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await allFuturesThrowing(futures)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
test "creating reservation reduces availability size":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
let orig = availability.freeSize
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
|
|
|
let key = availability.id.key.get
|
|
|
|
let updated = (await reservations.get(key, Availability)).get
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
check updated.freeSize == orig - reservation.size
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "can check if reservation exists":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
|
|
|
let key = reservation.key.get
|
|
|
|
check await reservations.exists(key)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "non-existant availability does not exist":
|
|
|
|
let key = AvailabilityId.example.key.get
|
|
|
|
check not (await reservations.exists(key))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "non-existant reservation does not exist":
|
|
|
|
let key = key(ReservationId.example, AvailabilityId.example).get
|
|
|
|
check not (await reservations.exists(key))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "can check if availability exists":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let key = availability.key.get
|
|
|
|
check await reservations.exists(key)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "can delete reservation":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
|
|
|
check isOk (await reservations.deleteReservation(
|
|
|
|
reservation.id, reservation.availabilityId)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
let key = reservation.key.get
|
|
|
|
check not (await reservations.exists(key))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "deleting reservation returns bytes back to availability":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
let orig = availability.freeSize
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
|
|
|
discard await reservations.deleteReservation(
|
|
|
|
reservation.id, reservation.availabilityId
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
let key = availability.key.get
|
|
|
|
let updated = !(await reservations.get(key, Availability))
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
check updated.freeSize == orig
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-13 19:58:17 +00:00
|
|
|
test "calling returnBytesToAvailability returns bytes back to availability":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
let orig = availability.freeSize - reservation.size
|
2023-12-13 19:58:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let origQuota = repo.quotaReservedBytes
|
|
|
|
let returnedBytes = reservation.size + 200.u256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check isOk await reservations.returnBytesToAvailability(
|
|
|
|
reservation.availabilityId, reservation.id, returnedBytes
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let key = availability.key.get
|
|
|
|
let updated = !(await reservations.get(key, Availability))
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
check updated.freeSize > orig
|
|
|
|
check (updated.freeSize - orig) == 200.u256
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
check (repo.quotaReservedBytes - origQuota) == 200.NBytes
|
2023-12-13 19:58:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
test "update releases quota when lowering size":
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
origQuota = repo.quotaReservedBytes
|
|
|
|
availability.totalSize = availability.totalSize - 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check isOk await reservations.update(availability)
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
check (origQuota - repo.quotaReservedBytes) == 100.NBytes
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "update reserves quota when growing size":
|
|
|
|
let
|
|
|
|
availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
origQuota = repo.quotaReservedBytes
|
|
|
|
availability.totalSize = availability.totalSize + 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check isOk await reservations.update(availability)
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
check (repo.quotaReservedBytes - origQuota) == 100.NBytes
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
test "reservation can be partially released":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
|
|
|
check isOk await reservations.release(
|
|
|
|
reservation.id,
|
|
|
|
reservation.availabilityId,
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
let key = reservation.key.get
|
|
|
|
let updated = !(await reservations.get(key, Reservation))
|
|
|
|
check updated.size == reservation.size - 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "cannot release more bytes than size of reservation":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
|
|
|
let updated = await reservations.release(
|
|
|
|
reservation.id,
|
|
|
|
reservation.availabilityId,
|
|
|
|
(reservation.size + 1).truncate(uint)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
check updated.isErr
|
|
|
|
check updated.error of BytesOutOfBoundsError
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "cannot release bytes from non-existant reservation":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
let reservation = createReservation(availability)
|
|
|
|
let updated = await reservations.release(
|
|
|
|
ReservationId.example,
|
|
|
|
availability.id,
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
check updated.isErr
|
|
|
|
check updated.error of NotExistsError
|
|
|
|
|
feat[marketplace]: add slot queue pausing (#752)
* add seen flag
* Add MockSlotQueueItem and better prioritisation tests
* Update seen priority, and include in SlotQueueItem.init
* Re-add processed slots to queue
Re-add processed slots to queue if the sale was ignored or errored
* add pausing of queue
- when processing slots in queue, pause queue if item was marked seen
- if availability size is increased, trigger onAvailabilityAdded callback
- in sales, on availability added, clear 'seen' flags, then unpause the queue
- when items pushed to the queue, unpause the queue
* remove unused NoMatchingAvailabilityError from slotqueue
The slot queue should also have nothing to do with availabilities
* when all availabilities are empty, pause the queue
An empty availability is defined as size < DefaultBlockSize as this means even the smallest possible request could not be served. However, this is up for discussion.
* remove availability from onAvailabilitiesEmptied callback
* refactor onAvailabilityAdded and onAvailabilitiesEmptied
onAvailabilityAdded and onAvailabilitiesEmptied are now only called from reservations.update (and eventually reservations.delete once implemented).
- Add empty routine for Availability and Reservation
- Add allEmpty routine for Availability and Reservation, which returns true when all all Availability or Reservation objects in the datastore are empty.
* SlotQueue test support updates
* Sales module test support updates
* Reservations module tests for queue pausing
* Sales module tests for queue pausing
Includes tests for sales states cancelled, errored, ignored to ensure onCleanUp is called with correct parameters
* SlotQueue module tests for queue pausing
* fix existing sales test
* PR feedback
- indent `self.unpause`
- update comment for `clearSeenFlags`
* reprocessSlot in SaleErrored only when coming from downloading
* remove pausing of queue when availabilities are "emptied"
Queue pausing when all availiabilies are "emptied" is not necessary, given that the node would not be able to service slots once all its availabilities' freeSize are too small for the slots in the queue, and would then be paused anyway.
Add test that asserts the queue is paused once the freeSpace of availabilities drops too low to fill slots in the queue.
* Update clearing of seen flags
The asyncheapqueue update overload would need to check index bounds and ultimately a different solution was found using the mitems iterator.
* fix test
request.id was different before updating request.ask.slots, and that id was used to set the state in mockmarket.
* Change filled/cleanup future to nil, so no await is needed
* add wait to allow items to be added to queue
* do not unpause queue when seen items are pushed
* re-add seen item back to queue once paused
Previously, when a seen item was processed, it was first popped off the queue, then the queue was paused waiting to process that item once the queue was unpaused. Now, when a seen item is processed, it is popped off the queue, the queue is paused, then the item is re-added to the queue and the queue will wait until unpaused before it will continue popping items off the queue. If the item was not re-added to the queue, it would have been processed immediately once unpaused, however there may have been other items with higher priority pushed to the queue in the meantime. The queue would not be unpaused if those added items were already seen. In particular, this may happen when ignored items due to lack of availability are re-added to a paused queue. Those ignored items will likely have a higher priority than the item that was just seen (due to it having been processed first), causing the queue to the be paused.
* address PR comments
2024-05-26 00:38:38 +00:00
|
|
|
test "onAvailabilityAdded called when availability is created":
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
var added: Availability
|
|
|
|
reservations.onAvailabilityAdded = proc(a: Availability) {.async.} =
|
|
|
|
added = a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check added == availability
|
|
|
|
|
feat[marketplace]: add slot queue pausing (#752)
* add seen flag
* Add MockSlotQueueItem and better prioritisation tests
* Update seen priority, and include in SlotQueueItem.init
* Re-add processed slots to queue
Re-add processed slots to queue if the sale was ignored or errored
* add pausing of queue
- when processing slots in queue, pause queue if item was marked seen
- if availability size is increased, trigger onAvailabilityAdded callback
- in sales, on availability added, clear 'seen' flags, then unpause the queue
- when items pushed to the queue, unpause the queue
* remove unused NoMatchingAvailabilityError from slotqueue
The slot queue should also have nothing to do with availabilities
* when all availabilities are empty, pause the queue
An empty availability is defined as size < DefaultBlockSize as this means even the smallest possible request could not be served. However, this is up for discussion.
* remove availability from onAvailabilitiesEmptied callback
* refactor onAvailabilityAdded and onAvailabilitiesEmptied
onAvailabilityAdded and onAvailabilitiesEmptied are now only called from reservations.update (and eventually reservations.delete once implemented).
- Add empty routine for Availability and Reservation
- Add allEmpty routine for Availability and Reservation, which returns true when all all Availability or Reservation objects in the datastore are empty.
* SlotQueue test support updates
* Sales module test support updates
* Reservations module tests for queue pausing
* Sales module tests for queue pausing
Includes tests for sales states cancelled, errored, ignored to ensure onCleanUp is called with correct parameters
* SlotQueue module tests for queue pausing
* fix existing sales test
* PR feedback
- indent `self.unpause`
- update comment for `clearSeenFlags`
* reprocessSlot in SaleErrored only when coming from downloading
* remove pausing of queue when availabilities are "emptied"
Queue pausing when all availiabilies are "emptied" is not necessary, given that the node would not be able to service slots once all its availabilities' freeSize are too small for the slots in the queue, and would then be paused anyway.
Add test that asserts the queue is paused once the freeSpace of availabilities drops too low to fill slots in the queue.
* Update clearing of seen flags
The asyncheapqueue update overload would need to check index bounds and ultimately a different solution was found using the mitems iterator.
* fix test
request.id was different before updating request.ask.slots, and that id was used to set the state in mockmarket.
* Change filled/cleanup future to nil, so no await is needed
* add wait to allow items to be added to queue
* do not unpause queue when seen items are pushed
* re-add seen item back to queue once paused
Previously, when a seen item was processed, it was first popped off the queue, then the queue was paused waiting to process that item once the queue was unpaused. Now, when a seen item is processed, it is popped off the queue, the queue is paused, then the item is re-added to the queue and the queue will wait until unpaused before it will continue popping items off the queue. If the item was not re-added to the queue, it would have been processed immediately once unpaused, however there may have been other items with higher priority pushed to the queue in the meantime. The queue would not be unpaused if those added items were already seen. In particular, this may happen when ignored items due to lack of availability are re-added to a paused queue. Those ignored items will likely have a higher priority than the item that was just seen (due to it having been processed first), causing the queue to the be paused.
* address PR comments
2024-05-26 00:38:38 +00:00
|
|
|
test "onAvailabilityAdded called when availability size is increased":
|
|
|
|
var availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
var added: Availability
|
|
|
|
reservations.onAvailabilityAdded = proc(a: Availability) {.async.} =
|
|
|
|
added = a
|
|
|
|
availability.freeSize += 1.u256
|
|
|
|
discard await reservations.update(availability)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check added == availability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "onAvailabilityAdded is not called when availability size is decreased":
|
|
|
|
var availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
var called = false
|
|
|
|
reservations.onAvailabilityAdded = proc(a: Availability) {.async.} =
|
|
|
|
called = true
|
|
|
|
availability.freeSize -= 1.u256
|
|
|
|
discard await reservations.update(availability)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check not called
|
|
|
|
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
test "availabilities can be found":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let found = await reservations.findAvailability(
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
availability.freeSize,
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
availability.duration,
|
|
|
|
availability.minPrice,
|
|
|
|
availability.maxCollateral)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check found.isSome
|
|
|
|
check found.get == availability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "non-matching availabilities are not found":
|
|
|
|
let availability = createAvailability()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let found = await reservations.findAvailability(
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
availability.freeSize + 1,
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
availability.duration,
|
|
|
|
availability.minPrice,
|
|
|
|
availability.maxCollateral)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check found.isNone
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "non-existant availability cannot be found":
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let availability = Availability.example
|
|
|
|
let found = (await reservations.findAvailability(
|
2024-03-21 10:53:45 +00:00
|
|
|
availability.freeSize,
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
availability.duration,
|
|
|
|
availability.minPrice,
|
|
|
|
availability.maxCollateral
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
check found.isNone
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "non-existant availability cannot be retrieved":
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
let key = AvailabilityId.example.key.get
|
|
|
|
let got = await reservations.get(key, Availability)
|
|
|
|
check got.error of NotExistsError
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "can get available bytes in repo":
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
check reservations.available == DefaultQuotaBytes.uint
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "reports quota available to be reserved":
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
check reservations.hasAvailable(DefaultQuotaBytes.uint - 1)
|
[marketplace] Add Reservations Module (#340)
* [marketplace] reservations module
- add de/serialization for Availability
- add markUsed/markUnused in persisted availability
- add query for unused
- add reserve/release
- reservation module tests
- split ContractInteractions into client contracts and host contracts
- remove reservations start/stop as the repo start/stop is being managed by the node
- remove dedicated reservations metadata store and use the metadata store from the repo instead
- Split ContractInteractions into:
- ClientInteractions (with purchasing)
- HostInteractions (with sales and proving)
- compilation fix for nim 1.2
[repostore] fix started flag, add tests
[marketplace] persist slot index
For loading the sales state from chain, the slot index was not previously persisted in the contract. Will retrieve the slot index from the contract when the sales state is loaded.
* Revert repostore changes
In favour of separate PR https://github.com/status-im/nim-codex/pull/374.
* remove warnings
* clean up
* tests: stop repostore during teardown
* change constructor type identifier
Change Contracts constructor to accept Contracts type instead of ContractInteractions.
* change constructor return type to Result instead of Option
* fix and split interactions tests
* clean up, fix tests
* find availability by slot id
* remove duplication in host/client interactions
* add test for finding availability by slotId
* log instead of raiseAssert when failed to mark availability as unused
* move to SaleErrored state instead of raiseAssert
* remove unneeded reverse
It appears that order is not preserved in the repostore, so reversing does not have the intended effect here.
* update open api spec for potential rest endpoint errors
* move functions about available bytes to repostore
* WIP: reserve and release availabilities as needed
WIP: not tested yet
Availabilities are marked as used when matched (just before downloading starts) so that future matching logic does not match an availability currently in use.
As the download progresses, batches of blocks are written to disk, and the equivalent bytes are released from the reservation module. The size of the availability is reduced as well.
During a reserve or release operation, availability updates occur after the repo is manipulated. If the availability update operation fails, the reserve or release is rolled back to maintain correct accounting of bytes.
Finally, once download completes, or if an error occurs, the availability is marked as unused so future matching can occur.
* delete availability when all bytes released
* fix tests + cleanup
* remove availability from SalesContext callbacks
Availability is no longer used past the SaleDownloading state in the state machine. Cleanup of Availability (marking unused) is handled directly in the SaleDownloading state, and no longer in SaleErrored or SaleFinished. Likewise, Availabilities shouldn’t need to be handled on node restart.
Additionally, Availability was being passed in SalesContext callbacks, and now that Availability is only used temporarily in the SaleDownloading state, Availability is contextually irrelevant to the callbacks, except in OnStore possibly, though it was not being consumed.
* test clean up
* - remove availability from callbacks and constructors from previous commit that needed to be removed (oopsie)
- fix integration test that checks availabilities
- there was a bug fixed that crashed the node due to a missing `return success` in onStore
- the test was fixed by ensuring that availabilities are remaining on the node, and the size has been reduced
- change Availability back to non-ref object and constructor back to init
- add trace logging of all state transitions in state machine
- add generally useful trace logging
* fixes after rebase
1. Fix onProve callbacks
2. Use Slot type instead of tuple for retrieving active slot.
3. Bump codex-contracts-eth that exposes getActivceSlot call.
* swap contracts branch to not support slot collateral
Slot collateral changes in the contracts require further changes in the client code, so we’ll skip those changes for now and add in a separate commit.
* modify Interactions and Deployment constructors
- `HostInteractions` and `ClientInteractions` constructors were simplified to take a contract address and no overloads
- `Interactions` prepared simplified so there are no overloads
- `Deployment` constructor updated so that it takes an optional string parameter, instead `Option[string]`
* Move `batchProc` declaration
`batchProc` needs to be consumed by both `node` and `salescontext`, and they can’t reference each other as it creates a circular dependency.
* [reservations] rename `available` to `hasAvailable`
* [reservations] default error message to inner error msg
* add SaleIngored state
When a storage request is handled but the request does match availabilities, the sales agent machine is sent to the SaleIgnored state. In addition, the agent is constructed in a way that if the request is ignored, the sales agent is removed from the list of active agents being tracked in the sales module.
2023-04-04 07:05:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "reports quota not available to be reserved":
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
check not reservations.hasAvailable(DefaultQuotaBytes.uint + 1)
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test "fails to create availability with size that is larger than available quota":
|
|
|
|
let created = await reservations.createAvailability(
|
2024-06-26 02:38:04 +00:00
|
|
|
(DefaultQuotaBytes.uint + 1).u256,
|
[marketplace] Availability improvements (#535)
## Problem
When Availabilities are created, the amount of bytes in the Availability are reserved in the repo, so those bytes on disk cannot be written to otherwise. When a request for storage is received by a node, if a previously created Availability is matched, an attempt will be made to fill a slot in the request (more accurately, the request's slots are added to the SlotQueue, and eventually those slots will be processed). During download, bytes that were reserved for the Availability were released (as they were written to disk). To prevent more bytes from being released than were reserved in the Availability, the Availability was marked as used during the download, so that no other requests would match the Availability, and therefore no new downloads (and byte releases) would begin. The unfortunate downside to this, is that the number of Availabilities a node has determines the download concurrency capacity. If, for example, a node creates a single Availability that covers all available disk space the operator is willing to use, that single Availability would mean that only one download could occur at a time, meaning the node could potentially miss out on storage opportunities.
## Solution
To alleviate the concurrency issue, each time a slot is processed, a Reservation is created, which takes size (aka reserved bytes) away from the Availability and stores them in the Reservation object. This can be done as many times as needed as long as there are enough bytes remaining in the Availability. Therefore, concurrent downloads are no longer limited by the number of Availabilities. Instead, they would more likely be limited to the SlotQueue's `maxWorkers`.
From a database design perspective, an Availability has zero or more Reservations.
Reservations are persisted in the RepoStore's metadata, along with Availabilities. The metadata store key path for Reservations is ` meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> / <reservationId>`, while Availabilities are stored one level up, eg `meta / sales / reservations / <availabilityId> `, allowing all Reservations for an Availability to be queried (this is not currently needed, but may be useful when work to restore Availability size is implemented, more on this later).
### Lifecycle
When a reservation is created, its size is deducted from the Availability, and when a reservation is deleted, any remaining size (bytes not written to disk) is returned to the Availability. If the request finishes, is cancelled (expired), or an error occurs, the Reservation is deleted (and any undownloaded bytes returned to the Availability). In addition, when the Sales module starts, any Reservations that are not actively being used in a filled slot, are deleted.
Having a Reservation persisted until after a storage request is completed, will allow for the originally set Availability size to be reclaimed once a request contract has been completed. This is a feature that is yet to be implemented, however the work in this PR is a step in the direction towards enabling this.
### Unknowns
Reservation size is determined by the `StorageAsk.slotSize`. If during download, more bytes than `slotSize` are attempted to be downloaded than this, then the Reservation update will fail, and the state machine will move to a `SaleErrored` state, deleting the Reservation. This will likely prevent the slot from being filled.
### Notes
Based on #514
2023-09-29 04:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
UInt256.example,
|
|
|
|
UInt256.example,
|
|
|
|
UInt256.example
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
check created.isErr
|
|
|
|
check created.error of ReserveFailedError
|
|
|
|
check created.error.parent of QuotaNotEnoughError
|