* Fixes.
* Make httpcommon no-raises.
* Make httpbodyrw no-raises.
* Make multipart no-raises.
* Make httpdebug no-raises.
* Make httpagent no-raises.
* Make httpclient no-raises.
* Make httpserver/shttpserver no-raises.
* fix prepend/remove when E is noraises
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacek Sieka <jacek@status.im>
With these fixes, `transports`/`asyncsync` correctly propagate and document their raises information - generally, most transport functions (send etc) raise `TransportError` and `CancelledError` - `closeWait` is special in that it generally doesn't fail.
This PR introduces the syntax `Future[void].Raises([types])` to create the `InternalRaisesFuture` type with the correct encoding for the types - this allows it to be used in user code while retaining the possibility to change the internal representation down the line.
* introduce raising constraints on stream callbacks - these constraints now give a warning when called with a callback that can raise exceptions (raising callbacks would crash
* fix fail and its tests, which wasn't always given a good generic match
* work around nim bugs related to macro expansion of generic types
* make sure transports raise only `TransportError`-derived exceptions (and `CancelledError`)
Per discussion in
https://github.com/status-im/nim-chronos/pull/251#issuecomment-1559233139,
`async: (parameters..)` is introduced as a way to customize the async
transformation instead of relying on separate keywords (like
asyncraises).
Two parameters are available as of now:
`raises`: controls the exception effect tracking
`raw`: disables body transformation
Parameters are added to `async` as a tuple allowing more params to be
added easily in the future:
```nim:
proc f() {.async: (name: value, ...).}`
```
* introduce `asyncraises` to core future utilities
Similar to the introduction of `raises` into a codebase, `asyncraises`
needs to be introduced gradually across all functionality before
deriving benefit.
This is a first introduction along with utilities to manage raises lists
and transform them at compile time.
Several scenarios ensue:
* for trivial cases, adding `asyncraises` is enough and the framework
deduces the rest
* some functions "add" new asyncraises (similar to what `raise` does in
"normal" code) - for example `wait` may raise all exceptions of the
future passed to it and additionally a few of its own - this requires
extending the raises list
* som functions "remove" raises (similar to what `try/except` does) such
as `nocancel` with blocks cancellations and therefore reduce the raising
set
Both of the above cases are currently handled by a macro, but depending
on the situation lead to code organisation issues around return types
and pragma limitations - in particular, to keep `asyncraises`
backwards-compatibility, some code needs to exist in two versions which
somewhat complicates the implementation.
* add `asyncraises` versions for several `asyncfutures` utilities
* when assigning exceptions to a `Future` via `fail`, check at compile
time if possible and at runtime if not that the exception matches
constraints
* fix `waitFor` comments
* move async raises to separate module, implement `or`
Eugene Kabanov
Jacek Sieka