Summary: I figured out that the uncaught rejection that happens on transform error originated from a "fork" along the chain, where we both "then" on a promise, and return that promise. In that case Node.js, legitimately I think, identifies this as an uncaught rejection case. One solution, in this changeset, is to do the side-effects as part of the promise chain instead of "forking". Another option would be to add an explicit error handler to the additional "then", but it seems we don't have to handle that case here.
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D4515592
fbshipit-source-id: 17d813cfdbc76685b6273b8d94e97d948fd68674
Summary:
This moves the `src` directory one level up and removes the `react-packager` folder. Personally, I always disliked this indirection. I'm reorganizing some things in RNP, so this seems to make sense.
Not sure if I forgot to update any paths. Can anyone advice if there are more places that need change?
Reviewed By: jeanlauliac
Differential Revision: D4487867
fbshipit-source-id: d63f9c79d6238300df9632d2e6a4e6a4196d5ccb
Summary: We can simplify as there's only one option, and it seems to me we can also make it required, as otherwise the `JSTransformer` is essentially doing nothing. I don't believe we still have use cases where no transform happens at all, even in OSS?
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D4481723
fbshipit-source-id: b2e3830b206d56242d298ff3a7b5f4587ecfd29a
Summary: It's not used from any callsite as far as I can see.
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D4481708
fbshipit-source-id: 2c503fb7ef20f9370a950c315832f3ace4709739
Summary: it's not used from any callsite as far as I can see.
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D4481699
fbshipit-source-id: 4cf63ef7953d6cfc58e7ef4f22ecb99bf51e76a0
Summary: It's not used in any callsite.
Reviewed By: cpojer
Differential Revision: D4481683
fbshipit-source-id: 3fa55693f5f56b4fb6c455ad77d7780f69be81a9
Summary: The idea is to make it easier to interact with tools consuming the packager's output. For example, Nuclide. Do you think that'd work well?
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D4482041
fbshipit-source-id: 6c64d7963195a4d786ed8902640f9e9f279f5f83
Alexey Kureev
Jean Lauliac
Bhuwan Khattar
Christoph Pojer
cpojer