mirror of https://github.com/status-im/go-waku.git
43 lines
1.2 KiB
Go
43 lines
1.2 KiB
Go
package utils
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"errors"
|
|
|
|
logging "github.com/ipfs/go-log"
|
|
"github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-core/host"
|
|
"github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-core/peer"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
var log = logging.Logger("utils")
|
|
|
|
func SelectPeer(host host.Host, protocolId string) (*peer.ID, error) {
|
|
// @TODO We need to be more strategic about which peers we dial. Right now we just set one on the service.
|
|
// Ideally depending on the query and our set of peers we take a subset of ideal peers.
|
|
// This will require us to check for various factors such as:
|
|
// - which topics they track
|
|
// - latency?
|
|
// - default store peer?
|
|
|
|
// Selects the best peer for a given protocol
|
|
|
|
var peers peer.IDSlice
|
|
for _, peer := range host.Peerstore().Peers() {
|
|
protocols, err := host.Peerstore().SupportsProtocols(peer, protocolId)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
log.Error("error obtaining the protocols supported by peers", err)
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(protocols) > 0 {
|
|
peers = append(peers, peer)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(peers) >= 1 {
|
|
// TODO: proper heuristic here that compares peer scores and selects "best" one. For now the first peer for the given protocol is returned
|
|
return &peers[0], nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil, errors.New("No suitable peers found")
|
|
}
|