26 KiB
Altair -- Honest Validator
This is an accompanying document to Altair -- The Beacon Chain, which describes the expected actions of a "validator" participating in the Ethereum proof-of-stake protocol.
Table of contents
- Introduction
- Prerequisites
- Warning
- Constants
- Containers
- Validator assignments
- Beacon chain responsibilities
- Sync committee subnet stability
Introduction
This document represents the expected behavior of an "honest validator" with respect to the Altair upgrade of the Ethereum proof-of-stake protocol. It builds on the previous document for the behavior of an "honest validator" from Phase 0 of the Ethereum proof-of-stake protocol. This previous document is referred to below as the "Phase 0 document".
Altair introduces a new type of committee: the sync committee. Sync committees are responsible for signing each block of the canonical chain and there exists an efficient algorithm for light clients to sync the chain using the output of the sync committees. See the sync protocol for further details on the light client sync. Under this network upgrade, validators track their participation in this new committee type and produce the relevant signatures as required. Block proposers incorporate the (aggregated) sync committee signatures into each block they produce.
Prerequisites
All terminology, constants, functions, and protocol mechanics defined in the Altair -- The Beacon Chain doc are requisite for this document and used throughout. Please see this document before continuing and use as a reference throughout.
Warning
This document is currently illustrative for early Altair testnets and some parts are subject to change, especially pending implementation and profiling of Altair testnets.
Constants
Misc
Name | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|
TARGET_AGGREGATORS_PER_SYNC_SUBCOMMITTEE |
2**4 (= 16) |
validators |
SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT |
4 |
The number of sync committee subnets used in the gossipsub aggregation protocol. |
Containers
SyncCommitteeMessage
class SyncCommitteeMessage(Container):
# Slot to which this contribution pertains
slot: Slot
# Block root for this signature
beacon_block_root: Root
# Index of the validator that produced this signature
validator_index: ValidatorIndex
# Signature by the validator over the block root of `slot`
signature: BLSSignature
SyncCommitteeContribution
class SyncCommitteeContribution(Container):
# Slot to which this contribution pertains
slot: Slot
# Block root for this contribution
beacon_block_root: Root
# The subcommittee this contribution pertains to out of the broader sync committee
subcommittee_index: uint64
# A bit is set if a signature from the validator at the corresponding
# index in the subcommittee is present in the aggregate `signature`.
aggregation_bits: Bitvector[SYNC_COMMITTEE_SIZE // SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT]
# Signature by the validator(s) over the block root of `slot`
signature: BLSSignature
ContributionAndProof
class ContributionAndProof(Container):
aggregator_index: ValidatorIndex
contribution: SyncCommitteeContribution
selection_proof: BLSSignature
SignedContributionAndProof
class SignedContributionAndProof(Container):
message: ContributionAndProof
signature: BLSSignature
SyncAggregatorSelectionData
class SyncAggregatorSelectionData(Container):
slot: Slot
subcommittee_index: uint64
Validator assignments
A validator determines beacon committee assignments and beacon block proposal duties as defined in the Phase 0 document.
Sync Committee
To determine sync committee assignments, a validator can run the following function: is_assigned_to_sync_committee(state, epoch, validator_index)
where epoch
is an epoch number within the current or next sync committee period.
This function is a predicate indicating the presence or absence of the validator in the corresponding sync committee for the queried sync committee period.
Note: Being assigned to a sync committee for a given slot
means that the validator produces and broadcasts signatures for slot - 1
for inclusion in slot
.
This means that when assigned to an epoch
sync committee signatures must be produced and broadcast for slots on range [compute_start_slot_at_epoch(epoch) - 1, compute_start_slot_at_epoch(epoch) + SLOTS_PER_EPOCH - 1)
rather than for the range [compute_start_slot_at_epoch(epoch), compute_start_slot_at_epoch(epoch) + SLOTS_PER_EPOCH)
.
To reduce complexity during the Altair fork, sync committees are not expected to produce signatures for compute_start_slot_at_epoch(ALTAIR_FORK_EPOCH) - 1
.
def compute_sync_committee_period(epoch: Epoch) -> uint64:
return epoch // EPOCHS_PER_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
def is_assigned_to_sync_committee(state: BeaconState,
epoch: Epoch,
validator_index: ValidatorIndex) -> bool:
sync_committee_period = compute_sync_committee_period(epoch)
current_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
current_sync_committee_period = compute_sync_committee_period(current_epoch)
next_sync_committee_period = current_sync_committee_period + 1
assert sync_committee_period in (current_sync_committee_period, next_sync_committee_period)
pubkey = state.validators[validator_index].pubkey
if sync_committee_period == current_sync_committee_period:
return pubkey in state.current_sync_committee.pubkeys
else: # sync_committee_period == next_sync_committee_period
return pubkey in state.next_sync_committee.pubkeys
Lookahead
The sync committee shufflings give validators 1 sync committee period of lookahead which amounts to EPOCHS_PER_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
epochs.
At any given epoch
, the BeaconState
contains the current SyncCommittee
and the next SyncCommittee
.
Once every EPOCHS_PER_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
epochs, the next SyncCommittee
becomes the current SyncCommittee
and the next committee is computed and stored.
Note: The data required to compute a given committee is not cached in the BeaconState
after committees are calculated at the period boundaries.
For this reason, always get committee assignments via the fields of the BeaconState
(current_sync_committee
and next_sync_committee
) or use the above reference code.
A validator should plan for future sync committee assignments by noting which sync committee periods they are selected for participation. Specifically, a validator should:
- Upon (re)syncing the chain and upon sync committee period boundaries, check for assignments in the current and next sync committee periods.
- If the validator is in the current sync committee period, then they perform the responsibilities below for sync committee rewards.
- If the validator is in the next sync committee period, they should wait until the next
EPOCHS_PER_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
boundary and then perform the responsibilities throughout that period.
Beacon chain responsibilities
A validator maintains the responsibilities given in the Phase 0 document.
Block proposals are modified to incorporate the sync committee signatures as detailed below.
When assigned to a sync committee, validators have a new responsibility to sign and broadcast beacon block roots during each slot of the sync committee period. These signatures are aggregated and routed to the proposer over gossip for inclusion into a beacon block. Assignments to a particular sync committee are infrequent at normal validator counts; however, an action every slot is required when in the current active sync committee.
Block proposal
Refer to the phase 0 document for the majority of the block proposal responsibility.
The validator should follow those instructions to prepare a SignedBeaconBlock
for inclusion into the chain. All changes are additive to phase 0 and noted below.
Preparing a BeaconBlock
No change to Preparing for a BeaconBlock
.
Constructing the BeaconBlockBody
Each section of Constructing the BeaconBlockBody
should be followed.
After constructing the BeaconBlockBody
as per that section, the proposer has an additional task to include the sync committee signatures:
Sync committee
The proposer receives a number of SyncCommitteeContribution
s (wrapped in SignedContributionAndProof
s on the wire) from validators in the sync committee who are selected to partially aggregate signatures from independent subcommittees formed by breaking the full sync committee into SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT
pieces (see below for details).
The proposer collects the contributions that match their local view of the chain (i.e. contribution.beacon_block_root == block.parent_root
) for further aggregation when preparing a block.
Of these contributions, proposers should select the best contribution seen across all aggregators for each subnet/subcommittee.
A contribution with more valid signatures is better than a contribution with fewer signatures.
Recall block.body.sync_aggregate.sync_committee_bits
is a Bitvector
where the i
th bit is True
if the corresponding validator in the sync committee has produced a valid signature,
and that block.body.sync_aggregate.sync_committee_signature
is the aggregate BLS signature combining all of the valid signatures.
Given a collection of the best seen contributions
(with no repeating subcommittee_index
values) and the BeaconBlock
under construction,
the proposer processes them as follows:
def process_sync_committee_contributions(block: BeaconBlock,
contributions: Set[SyncCommitteeContribution]) -> None:
sync_aggregate = SyncAggregate()
signatures = []
sync_subcommittee_size = SYNC_COMMITTEE_SIZE // SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT
for contribution in contributions:
subcommittee_index = contribution.subcommittee_index
for index, participated in enumerate(contribution.aggregation_bits):
if participated:
participant_index = sync_subcommittee_size * subcommittee_index + index
sync_aggregate.sync_committee_bits[participant_index] = True
signatures.append(contribution.signature)
sync_aggregate.sync_committee_signature = bls.Aggregate(signatures)
block.body.sync_aggregate = sync_aggregate
Note: The resulting block must pass the validations for the SyncAggregate
defined in process_sync_aggregate
defined in the state transition document.
In particular, this means SyncCommitteeContribution
s received from gossip must have a beacon_block_root
that matches the proposer's local view of the chain.
Packaging into a SignedBeaconBlock
No change to Packaging into a SignedBeaconBlock
.
Attesting and attestation aggregation
Refer to the phase 0 document for the attesting and attestation aggregation responsibilities. There is no change compared to the phase 0 document.
Sync committees
Sync committee members employ an aggregation scheme to reduce load on the global proposer channel that is monitored by all potential proposers to be able to include the full output of the sync committee every slot.
Sync committee members produce individual signatures on subnets (similar to the attestation subnets) via SyncCommitteeMessage
s which are then collected by aggregators sampled from the sync subcommittees to produce a SyncCommitteeContribution
which is gossiped to proposers.
This process occurs each slot.
Sync committee messages
Prepare sync committee message
If a validator is in the current sync committee (i.e. is_assigned_to_sync_committee()
above returns True
), then for every slot
in the current sync committee period, the validator should prepare a SyncCommitteeMessage
for the previous slot (slot - 1
) according to the logic in get_sync_committee_message
as soon as they have determined the head block of slot - 1
. This means that when assigned to slot
a SyncCommitteeMessage
is prepared and broadcast in slot-1
instead of slot
.
This logic is triggered upon the same conditions as when producing an attestation.
Meaning, a sync committee member should produce and broadcast a SyncCommitteeMessage
either when (a) the validator has received a valid block from the expected block proposer for the current slot
or (b) one-third of the slot has transpired (SECONDS_PER_SLOT / INTERVALS_PER_SLOT
seconds after the start of the slot) -- whichever comes first.
get_sync_committee_message(state, block_root, validator_index, privkey)
assumes the parameter state
is the head state corresponding to processing the block up to the current slot as determined by the fork choice (including any empty slots up to the current slot processed with process_slots
on top of the latest block), block_root
is the root of the head block, validator_index
is the index of the validator in the registry state.validators
controlled by privkey
, and privkey
is the BLS private key for the validator.
def get_sync_committee_message(state: BeaconState,
block_root: Root,
validator_index: ValidatorIndex,
privkey: int) -> SyncCommitteeMessage:
epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_SYNC_COMMITTEE, epoch)
signing_root = compute_signing_root(block_root, domain)
signature = bls.Sign(privkey, signing_root)
return SyncCommitteeMessage(
slot=state.slot,
beacon_block_root=block_root,
validator_index=validator_index,
signature=signature,
)
Broadcast sync committee message
The validator broadcasts the assembled signature to the assigned subnet, the sync_committee_{subnet_id}
pubsub topic.
The subnet_id
is derived from the position in the sync committee such that the sync committee is divided into "subcommittees".
subnet_id
can be computed via compute_subnets_for_sync_committee(state, validator_index)
where state
is a BeaconState
during the matching sync committee period.
Note: This function returns multiple deduplicated subnets if a given validator index is included multiple times in a given sync committee across multiple subcommittees.
def compute_subnets_for_sync_committee(state: BeaconState, validator_index: ValidatorIndex) -> Set[uint64]:
next_slot_epoch = compute_epoch_at_slot(Slot(state.slot + 1))
if compute_sync_committee_period(get_current_epoch(state)) == compute_sync_committee_period(next_slot_epoch):
sync_committee = state.current_sync_committee
else:
sync_committee = state.next_sync_committee
target_pubkey = state.validators[validator_index].pubkey
sync_committee_indices = [index for index, pubkey in enumerate(sync_committee.pubkeys) if pubkey == target_pubkey]
return set([
uint64(index // (SYNC_COMMITTEE_SIZE // SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT))
for index in sync_committee_indices
])
Note: Subnet assignment does not change during the duration of a validator's assignment to a given sync committee.
Note: If a validator has multiple subnet_id
results from compute_subnets_for_sync_committee
, the validator should broadcast a copy of the sync_committee_message
on each of the distinct subnets.
Sync committee contributions
Each slot, some sync committee members in each subcommittee are selected to aggregate the SyncCommitteeMessage
s into a SyncCommitteeContribution
which is broadcast on a global channel for inclusion into the next block.
Aggregation selection
A validator is selected to aggregate based on the value returned by is_sync_committee_aggregator()
where signature
is the BLS signature returned by get_sync_committee_selection_proof()
.
The signature function takes a BeaconState
with the relevant sync committees for the queried slot
(i.e. state.slot
is within the span covered by the current or next sync committee period), the subcommittee_index
equal to the subnet_id
, and the privkey
is the BLS private key associated with the validator.
def get_sync_committee_selection_proof(state: BeaconState,
slot: Slot,
subcommittee_index: uint64,
privkey: int) -> BLSSignature:
domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_SYNC_COMMITTEE_SELECTION_PROOF, compute_epoch_at_slot(slot))
signing_data = SyncAggregatorSelectionData(
slot=slot,
subcommittee_index=subcommittee_index,
)
signing_root = compute_signing_root(signing_data, domain)
return bls.Sign(privkey, signing_root)
def is_sync_committee_aggregator(signature: BLSSignature) -> bool:
modulo = max(1, SYNC_COMMITTEE_SIZE // SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT // TARGET_AGGREGATORS_PER_SYNC_SUBCOMMITTEE)
return bytes_to_uint64(hash(signature)[0:8]) % modulo == 0
NOTE: The set of aggregators generally changes every slot; however, the assignments can be computed ahead of time as soon as the committee is known.
Construct sync committee contribution
If a validator is selected to aggregate the SyncCommitteeMessage
s produced on a subnet during a given slot
, they construct an aggregated SyncCommitteeContribution
.
Collect all of the (valid) sync_committee_messages: Set[SyncCommitteeMessage]
from the sync_committee_{subnet_id}
gossip during the selected slot
with an equivalent beacon_block_root
to that of the aggregator. If len(sync_committee_messages) > 0
, the aggregator creates a contribution: SyncCommitteeContribution
with the following fields:
Slot
Set contribution.slot = state.slot
where state
is the BeaconState
for the slot in question.
Beacon block root
Set contribution.beacon_block_root = beacon_block_root
from the beacon_block_root
found in the sync_committee_messages
.
Subcommittee index
Set contribution.subcommittee_index
to the index for the subcommittee index corresponding to the subcommittee assigned to this subnet. This index matches the subnet_id
used to derive the topic name.
Aggregation bits
Let contribution.aggregation_bits
be a Bitvector[SYNC_COMMITTEE_SIZE // SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT]
, where the index
th bit is set in the Bitvector
for each corresponding validator included in this aggregate from the corresponding subcommittee.
An aggregator finds the index in the sync committee (as determined by a reverse pubkey lookup on state.current_sync_committee.pubkeys
) for a given validator referenced by sync_committee_message.validator_index
and maps the sync committee index to an index in the subcommittee (along with the prior subcommittee_index
). This index within the subcommittee is set in contribution.aggegration_bits
.
For example, if a validator with index 2044
is pseudo-randomly sampled to sync committee index 135
. This sync committee index maps to subcommittee_index
1
with position 7
in the Bitvector
for the contribution.
Note: A validator could be included multiple times in a given subcommittee such that multiple bits are set for a single SyncCommitteeMessage
.
Signature
Set contribution.signature = aggregate_signature
where aggregate_signature
is obtained by assembling the appropriate collection of BLSSignature
s from the set of sync_committee_messages
and using the bls.Aggregate()
function to produce an aggregate BLSSignature
.
The collection of input signatures should include one signature per validator who had a bit set in the aggregation_bits
bitfield, with repeated signatures if one validator maps to multiple indices within the subcommittee.
Broadcast sync committee contribution
If the validator is selected to aggregate (is_sync_committee_aggregator()
), then they broadcast their best aggregate as a SignedContributionAndProof
to the global aggregate channel (sync_committee_contribution_and_proof
topic) two-thirds of the way through the slot
-that is, SECONDS_PER_SLOT * 2 / INTERVALS_PER_SLOT
seconds after the start of slot
.
Selection proofs are provided in ContributionAndProof
to prove to the gossip channel that the validator has been selected as an aggregator.
ContributionAndProof
messages are signed by the aggregator and broadcast inside of SignedContributionAndProof
objects to prevent a class of DoS attacks and message forgeries.
First, contribution_and_proof = get_contribution_and_proof(state, validator_index, contribution, privkey)
is constructed.
def get_contribution_and_proof(state: BeaconState,
aggregator_index: ValidatorIndex,
contribution: SyncCommitteeContribution,
privkey: int) -> ContributionAndProof:
selection_proof = get_sync_committee_selection_proof(
state,
contribution.slot,
contribution.subcommittee_index,
privkey,
)
return ContributionAndProof(
aggregator_index=aggregator_index,
contribution=contribution,
selection_proof=selection_proof,
)
Then signed_contribution_and_proof = SignedContributionAndProof(message=contribution_and_proof, signature=signature)
is constructed and broadcast. Where signature
is obtained from:
def get_contribution_and_proof_signature(state: BeaconState,
contribution_and_proof: ContributionAndProof,
privkey: int) -> BLSSignature:
contribution = contribution_and_proof.contribution
domain = get_domain(state, DOMAIN_CONTRIBUTION_AND_PROOF, compute_epoch_at_slot(contribution.slot))
signing_root = compute_signing_root(contribution_and_proof, domain)
return bls.Sign(privkey, signing_root)
Sync committee subnet stability
The sync committee subnets need special care to ensure stability given the relatively low number of validators involved in the sync committee at any particular time. To provide this stability, a validator must do the following:
-
Maintain advertisement of the subnet the validator in the sync committee is assigned to in their node's ENR as soon as they have joined the subnet. Subnet assignments are known
EPOCHS_PER_SYNC_COMMITTEE_PERIOD
epochs in advance and can be computed withcompute_subnets_for_sync_committee
defined above. ENR advertisement is indicated by setting the appropriate bit(s) of the bitfield found under thesyncnets
key in the ENR corresponding to the derivedsubnet_id
(s). Any bits modified for the sync committee responsibilities are unset in the ENR once the node no longer has any validators in the subcommittee.Note: The first sync committee from phase 0 to the Altair fork will not be known until the fork happens, which implies subnet assignments are not known until then. Early sync committee members should listen for topic subscriptions from peers and employ discovery via the ENR advertisements near the fork boundary to form initial subnets. Some early sync committee rewards may be missed while the initial subnets form.
-
To join a sync committee subnet, select a random number of epochs before the end of the current sync committee period between 1 and
SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT
, inclusive. Validators should join their member subnet at the beginning of the epoch they have randomly selected. For example, if the next sync committee period starts at epoch853,248
and the validator randomly selects an offset of3
, they should join the subnet at the beginning of epoch853,245
. Validators should leverage the lookahead period on sync committee assignments so that they can join the appropriate subnets ahead of their assigned sync committee period.