diff --git a/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md b/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md
index bdf0919e0..6c4cdd2a6 100644
--- a/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md
+++ b/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ Additional global topics are used to propagate lower frequency validator message
 Attestation subnets are used to propagate unaggregated attestations to subsections of the network. Their `Name`s are:
 
 - `beacon_attestation_{subnet_id}` - These topics are used to propagate unaggregated attestations to the subnet `subnet_id` (typically beacon and persistent committees) to be aggregated before being gossiped to `beacon_aggregate_and_proof`. The following validations MUST pass before forwarding the `attestation` on the subnet.
-    - _[REJECT]_ The attestation is for the correct subnet (i.e. `compute_subnet_for_attestation(state, attestation) == subnet_id`).
+    - _[REJECT]_ The attestation is for the correct subnet (i.e. `compute_subnet_for_attestation(state, attestation.data.slot, attestation.data.index) == subnet_id`).
     - _[IGNORE]_ `attestation.data.slot` is within the last `ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE` slots (within a `MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY` allowance) -- i.e. `attestation.data.slot + ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE >= current_slot >= attestation.data.slot` (a client MAY queue future attestations for processing at the appropriate slot).
     - _[REJECT]_ The attestation is unaggregated -- that is, it has exactly one participating validator (`len(get_attesting_indices(state, attestation.data, attestation.aggregation_bits)) == 1`).
     - _[IGNORE]_ There has been no other valid attestation seen on an attestation subnet that has an identical `attestation.data.target.epoch` and participating validator index.
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ Attestation subnets are used to propagate unaggregated attestations to subsectio
 
 Attestation broadcasting is grouped into subnets defined by a topic. The number of subnets is defined via `ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT`. The correct subnet for an attestation can be calculated with `compute_subnet_for_attestation`. `beacon_attestation_{subnet_id}` topics, are rotated through throughout the epoch in a similar fashion to rotating through shards in committees in Phase 1.
 
-Unaggregated attestations are sent to the subnet topic, `beacon_attestation_{compute_subnet_for_attestation(state, attestation)}` as `Attestation`s.
+Unaggregated attestations are sent to the subnet topic, `beacon_attestation_{compute_subnet_for_attestation(state, attestation.data.slot, attestation.data.index)}` as `Attestation`s.
 
 Aggregated attestations are sent to the `beacon_aggregate_and_proof` topic as `AggregateAndProof`s.
 
diff --git a/specs/phase0/validator.md b/specs/phase0/validator.md
index 5e8ddc977..35c52f346 100644
--- a/specs/phase0/validator.md
+++ b/specs/phase0/validator.md
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ The beacon chain shufflings are designed to provide a minimum of 1 epoch lookahe
 
 Specifically a validator should:
 * Call `get_committee_assignment(state, next_epoch, validator_index)` when checking for next epoch assignments.
-* Find peers of the pubsub topic `committee_index{committee_index % ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT}_beacon_attestation`.
-    * If an _insufficient_ number of current peers are subscribed to the topic, the validator must discover new peers on this topic. Via the discovery protocol, find peers with an ENR containing the `attnets` entry such that `ENR["attnets"][committee_index % ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT] == True`. Then validate that the peers are still persisted on the desired topic by requesting `GetMetaData` and checking the resulting `attnets` field.
+* Find peers of the pubsub topic `beacon_attestation_{compute_subnet_for_attestation(state, slot, committee_index)}`.
+    * If an _insufficient_ number of current peers are subscribed to the topic, the validator must discover new peers on this topic. Via the discovery protocol, find peers with an ENR containing the `attnets` entry such that `ENR["attnets"][compute_subnet_for_attestation(state, slot, committee_index)] == True`. Then validate that the peers are still persisted on the desired topic by requesting `GetMetaData` and checking the resulting `attnets` field.
     * If the validator is assigned to be an aggregator for the slot (see `is_aggregator()`), then subscribe to the topic.
 
 *Note*: If the validator is _not_ assigned to be an aggregator, the validator only needs sufficient number of peers on the topic to be able to publish messages. The validator does not need to _subscribe_ and listen to all messages on the topic.
@@ -425,18 +425,18 @@ def get_attestation_signature(state: BeaconState, attestation_data: AttestationD
 
 #### Broadcast attestation
 
-Finally, the validator broadcasts `attestation` to the associated attestation subnet -- the `beacon_attestation_{compute_subnet_for_attestation(state, attestation)}` pubsub topic.
+Finally, the validator broadcasts `attestation` to the associated attestation subnet -- the `beacon_attestation_{compute_subnet_for_attestation(state, attestation.data.slot, attestation.data.committee_index)}` pubsub topic.
 
 ```python
-def compute_subnet_for_attestation(state: BeaconState, attestation: Attestation) -> uint64:
+def compute_subnet_for_attestation(state: BeaconState, slot: Slot, committee_index: CommitteeIndex) -> uint64:
     """
     Compute the correct subnet for an attestation for Phase 0.
     Note, this mimics expected Phase 1 behavior where attestations will be mapped to their shard subnet.
     """
-    slots_since_epoch_start = attestation.data.slot % SLOTS_PER_EPOCH
-    committees_since_epoch_start = get_committee_count_at_slot(state, attestation.data.slot) * slots_since_epoch_start
+    slots_since_epoch_start = slot % SLOTS_PER_EPOCH
+    committees_since_epoch_start = get_committee_count_at_slot(state, slot) * slots_since_epoch_start
 
-    return (committees_since_epoch_start + attestation.data.index) % ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT
+    return (committees_since_epoch_start + committee_index) % ATTESTATION_SUBNET_COUNT
 ```
 
 ### Attestation aggregation