John Cowen 40e71f1b91
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573)
* Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572)
* Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573)

1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin
which better describes what it does
2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove
things work/add confidence for further changes

The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are
now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their
specific routes, i.e. where to redirect.

The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then
notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do
one thing and one thing 'well'.

Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by
mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would
like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based
approach.

There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot
happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 19:14:31 +01:00

23 lines
664 B
Gherkin

@setupApplicationTest
Feature: settings / update: Update Settings
In order to authenticate with an ACL token
As a user
I need to be able to add my token via the UI
Scenario: I click Save without actually typing anything
Given 1 datacenter model with the value "datacenter"
When I visit the settings page
Then the url should be /settings
Then I have settings like yaml
---
token: ~
---
And I submit
Then I have settings like yaml
---
token: ''
---
And the url should be /settings
And "[data-notification]" has the "notification-update" class
And "[data-notification]" has the "success" class