mirror of https://github.com/status-im/consul.git
415 lines
14 KiB
Go
415 lines
14 KiB
Go
package autopilot
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"sort"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/raft"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// aliveServers will filter the input map of servers and output one with all of the
|
|
// servers in a Left state removed.
|
|
func aliveServers(servers map[raft.ServerID]*Server) map[raft.ServerID]*Server {
|
|
serverMap := make(map[raft.ServerID]*Server)
|
|
for _, server := range servers {
|
|
if server.NodeStatus == NodeLeft {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
serverMap[server.ID] = server
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return serverMap
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// nextStateInputs is the collection of values that can influence
|
|
// creation of the next State.
|
|
type nextStateInputs struct {
|
|
Now time.Time
|
|
StartTime time.Time
|
|
Config *Config
|
|
State *State
|
|
RaftConfig *raft.Configuration
|
|
KnownServers map[raft.ServerID]*Server
|
|
AliveServers map[raft.ServerID]*Server
|
|
LatestIndex uint64
|
|
LastTerm uint64
|
|
FetchedStats map[raft.ServerID]*ServerStats
|
|
LeaderID raft.ServerID
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// gatherNextStateInputs gathers all the information that would be used to
|
|
// create the new updated state from.
|
|
//
|
|
// - Time Providers current time.
|
|
// - Autopilot Config (needed to determine if the stats should indicate unhealthiness)
|
|
// - Current state
|
|
// - Raft Configuration
|
|
// - Known Servers
|
|
// - Latest raft index (gatered right before the remote server stats so that they should
|
|
// be from about the same point in time)
|
|
// - Stats for all non-left servers
|
|
func (a *Autopilot) gatherNextStateInputs(ctx context.Context) (*nextStateInputs, error) {
|
|
// we are going to hold this lock for the entire function. In theory nothing should
|
|
// modify the state on any other go routine so this really shouldn't block anything
|
|
// else. However we want to ensure that the inputs are as consistent as possible.
|
|
a.stateLock.RLock()
|
|
defer a.stateLock.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
// there are a lot of inputs to computing the next state so they get put into a
|
|
// struct so that we don't have to return 8 values.
|
|
inputs := &nextStateInputs{
|
|
Now: a.time.Now(),
|
|
StartTime: a.startTime,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// grab the latest autopilot configuration
|
|
config := a.delegate.AutopilotConfig()
|
|
if config == nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("delegate did not return an Autopilot configuration")
|
|
}
|
|
inputs.Config = config
|
|
|
|
// retrieve the current state
|
|
inputs.State = a.state
|
|
if inputs.State == nil {
|
|
inputs.State = &State{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// retrieve the raft configuration
|
|
raftConfig, err := a.getRaftConfiguration()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get the Raft configuration: %w", err)
|
|
}
|
|
inputs.RaftConfig = raftConfig
|
|
|
|
leader := a.raft.Leader()
|
|
for _, s := range inputs.RaftConfig.Servers {
|
|
if s.Address == leader {
|
|
inputs.LeaderID = s.ID
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if inputs.LeaderID == "" {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("cannot detect the current leader server id from its address: %s", leader)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// get the latest Raft index - this should be kept close to the call to
|
|
// fetch the statistics so that the index values are as close in time as
|
|
// possible to make the best decision regarding an individual servers
|
|
// healthiness.
|
|
inputs.LatestIndex = a.raft.LastIndex()
|
|
|
|
term, err := a.lastTerm()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to determine the last Raft term: %w", err)
|
|
}
|
|
inputs.LastTerm = term
|
|
|
|
// getting the raft configuration could block for a while so now is a good
|
|
// time to check for context cancellation
|
|
if ctx.Err() != nil {
|
|
return nil, ctx.Err()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// get the known servers which may include left/failed ones
|
|
inputs.KnownServers = a.delegate.KnownServers()
|
|
|
|
// in most cases getting the known servers should be quick but as we cannot
|
|
// account for every potential delegate and prevent them from making
|
|
// blocking network requests we should probably check the context again.
|
|
if ctx.Err() != nil {
|
|
return nil, ctx.Err()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// filter the known servers to have a map of just the alive servers
|
|
inputs.AliveServers = aliveServers(inputs.KnownServers)
|
|
|
|
// we only allow the fetch to take place for up to half the health interval
|
|
// the next health interval will attempt to fetch the stats again but if
|
|
// we do not see responses within this time then we can assume they are
|
|
// unhealthy
|
|
d := inputs.Now.Add(a.updateInterval / 2)
|
|
fetchCtx, cancel := context.WithDeadline(ctx, d)
|
|
defer cancel()
|
|
|
|
inputs.FetchedStats = a.delegate.FetchServerStats(fetchCtx, inputs.AliveServers)
|
|
|
|
// it might be nil but we propagate the ctx.Err just in case our context was
|
|
// cancelled since the last time we checked.
|
|
return inputs, ctx.Err()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// nextState will gather many inputs about the current state of servers from the
|
|
// delegate, raft and time provider among other sources and then compute the
|
|
// next Autopilot state.
|
|
func (a *Autopilot) nextState(ctx context.Context) (*State, error) {
|
|
inputs, err := a.gatherNextStateInputs(ctx)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
state := a.nextStateWithInputs(inputs)
|
|
if state.Leader == "" {
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("Unabled to detect the leader server")
|
|
}
|
|
return state, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// nextStateWithInputs computes the next state given pre-gathered inputs
|
|
func (a *Autopilot) nextStateWithInputs(inputs *nextStateInputs) *State {
|
|
nextServers := a.nextServers(inputs)
|
|
|
|
newState := &State{
|
|
startTime: inputs.StartTime,
|
|
Healthy: true,
|
|
Servers: nextServers,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
voterCount := 0
|
|
healthyVoters := 0
|
|
|
|
// This loop will
|
|
// 1. Determine the ID of the leader server and set it in the state
|
|
// 2. Count the number of voters in the cluster
|
|
// 3. Count the number of healthy voters in the cluster
|
|
// 4. Detect unhealthy servers and mark the overall health as false
|
|
for id, srv := range nextServers {
|
|
if !srv.Health.Healthy {
|
|
// any unhealthiness results in overall unhealthiness
|
|
newState.Healthy = false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch srv.State {
|
|
case RaftLeader:
|
|
newState.Leader = id
|
|
fallthrough
|
|
case RaftVoter:
|
|
newState.Voters = append(newState.Voters, id)
|
|
voterCount++
|
|
|
|
if srv.Health.Healthy {
|
|
healthyVoters++
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we have extra healthy voters, update FailureTolerance from its
|
|
// zero value in the struct.
|
|
requiredQuorum := requiredQuorum(voterCount)
|
|
if healthyVoters > requiredQuorum {
|
|
newState.FailureTolerance = healthyVoters - requiredQuorum
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// update any promoter specific overall state
|
|
if newExt := a.promoter.GetStateExt(inputs.Config, newState); newExt != nil {
|
|
newState.Ext = newExt
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// update the node types - these are really informational for users to
|
|
// know how autopilot and the associate promoter algorithms have classed
|
|
// each server as some promotion algorithms may want to keep certain
|
|
// servers as non-voters for reasons. The node type then can be used
|
|
// to indicate why that might be happening.
|
|
for id, typ := range a.promoter.GetNodeTypes(inputs.Config, newState) {
|
|
if srv, ok := newState.Servers[id]; ok {
|
|
srv.Server.NodeType = typ
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Sort the voters list to keep the output stable. This is done near the end
|
|
// as SortServers may use other parts of the state that were created in
|
|
// this method and populated in the newState. Requiring output stability
|
|
// helps make tests easier to manage and means that if you happen to be dumping
|
|
// the state periodically you shouldn't see things change unless there
|
|
// are real changes to server health or overall configuration.
|
|
SortServers(newState.Voters, newState)
|
|
|
|
return newState
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// nextServers will build out the servers map for the next state to be created
|
|
// from the given inputs. This will take into account all the various sources
|
|
// of partial state (current state, raft config, application known servers etc.)
|
|
// and combine them into the final server map.
|
|
func (a *Autopilot) nextServers(inputs *nextStateInputs) map[raft.ServerID]*ServerState {
|
|
newServers := make(map[raft.ServerID]*ServerState)
|
|
|
|
for _, srv := range inputs.RaftConfig.Servers {
|
|
state := buildServerState(inputs, srv)
|
|
|
|
// update any promoter specific information. This isn't done within
|
|
// buildServerState to keep that function "pure" and not require
|
|
// mocking for tests
|
|
if newExt := a.promoter.GetServerExt(inputs.Config, &state); newExt != nil {
|
|
state.Server.Ext = newExt
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
newServers[srv.ID] = &state
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return newServers
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// buildServerState takes all the nextStateInputs and builds out a ServerState
|
|
// for the given Raft server. This will take into account the raft configuration
|
|
// existing state, application known servers and recently fetched stats.
|
|
func buildServerState(inputs *nextStateInputs, srv raft.Server) ServerState {
|
|
// Note that the ordering of operations in this method are very important.
|
|
// We are building up the ServerState from the least important sources
|
|
// and overriding them with more up to date values.
|
|
|
|
// build the basic state from the Raft server
|
|
state := ServerState{
|
|
Server: Server{
|
|
ID: srv.ID,
|
|
Address: srv.Address,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch srv.Suffrage {
|
|
case raft.Voter:
|
|
state.State = RaftVoter
|
|
case raft.Nonvoter:
|
|
state.State = RaftNonVoter
|
|
case raft.Staging:
|
|
state.State = RaftStaging
|
|
default:
|
|
// should be impossible unless the constants in Raft were updated
|
|
// to have a new state.
|
|
// TODO (mkeeler) maybe a panic would be better here. The downside is
|
|
// that it would be hard to catch that in tests when updating the Raft
|
|
// version.
|
|
state.State = RaftNone
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// overwrite the raft state to mark the leader as such instead of just
|
|
// a regular voter
|
|
if srv.ID == inputs.LeaderID {
|
|
state.State = RaftLeader
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var existingHealth *ServerHealth
|
|
|
|
// copy some state from an existing server into the new state - most of this
|
|
// should be overridden soon but at this point we are just building the base.
|
|
if existing, found := inputs.State.Servers[srv.ID]; found {
|
|
state.Stats = existing.Stats
|
|
state.Health = existing.Health
|
|
existingHealth = &existing.Health
|
|
|
|
// it is is important to note that the map values we retrieved this from are
|
|
// stored by value. Therefore we are modifying a copy of what is in the existing
|
|
// state and not the actual state itself. We want to ensure that the Address
|
|
// is what Raft will know about.
|
|
existing.Server.Address = srv.Address
|
|
|
|
state.Server = existing.Server
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// pull in the latest information from the applications knowledge of the
|
|
// server. Mainly we want the NodeStatus & Meta
|
|
if known, found := inputs.KnownServers[srv.ID]; found {
|
|
// it is important to note that we are modifying a copy of a Server as the
|
|
// map we retrieved this from has a non-pointer type value. We definitely
|
|
// do not want to modify the current known servers but we do want to ensure
|
|
// that we do not overwrite the Address
|
|
known.Address = srv.Address
|
|
state.Server = *known
|
|
} else {
|
|
// TODO (mkeeler) do we need a None state. In the previous autopilot code
|
|
// we would have set this to serf.StatusNone
|
|
state.Server.NodeStatus = NodeLeft
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// override the Stats if any where in the fetched results
|
|
if stats, found := inputs.FetchedStats[srv.ID]; found {
|
|
state.Stats = *stats
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// now populate the healthy field given the stats
|
|
state.Health.Healthy = state.isHealthy(inputs.LastTerm, inputs.LatestIndex, inputs.Config)
|
|
// overwrite the StableSince field if this is a new server or when
|
|
// the health status changes. No need for an else as we previously set
|
|
// it when we overwrote the whole Health structure when finding a
|
|
// server in the existing state
|
|
if existingHealth == nil || existingHealth.Healthy != state.Health.Healthy {
|
|
state.Health.StableSince = inputs.Now
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return state
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// updateState will compute the nextState, set it on the Autopilot instance and
|
|
// then notify the delegate of the update.
|
|
func (a *Autopilot) updateState(ctx context.Context) {
|
|
newState, err := a.nextState(ctx)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
a.logger.Error("Error when computing next state", "error", err)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
a.stateLock.Lock()
|
|
defer a.stateLock.Unlock()
|
|
a.state = newState
|
|
a.delegate.NotifyState(newState)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// SortServers will take a list of raft ServerIDs and sort it using
|
|
// information from the State. See the ServerLessThan function for
|
|
// details about how two servers get compared.
|
|
func SortServers(ids []raft.ServerID, s *State) {
|
|
sort.Slice(ids, func(i, j int) bool {
|
|
return ServerLessThan(ids[i], ids[j], s)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ServerLessThan will lookup both servers in the given State and return
|
|
// true if the first id corresponds to a server that is logically less than
|
|
// lower than, better than etc. the second server. The following criteria
|
|
// are considered in order of most important to least important
|
|
//
|
|
// 1. A Leader server is always less than all others
|
|
// 2. A voter is less than non voters
|
|
// 3. Healthy servers are less than unhealthy servers
|
|
// 4. Servers that have been stable longer are consider less than.
|
|
func ServerLessThan(id1 raft.ServerID, id2 raft.ServerID, s *State) bool {
|
|
srvI := s.Servers[id1]
|
|
srvJ := s.Servers[id2]
|
|
|
|
// the leader always comes first
|
|
if srvI.State == RaftLeader {
|
|
return true
|
|
} else if srvJ.State == RaftLeader {
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// voters come before non-voters & staging
|
|
if srvI.State == RaftVoter && srvJ.State != RaftVoter {
|
|
return true
|
|
} else if srvI.State != RaftVoter && srvJ.State == RaftVoter {
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// at this point we know that the raft state of both nodes is roughly
|
|
// equivalent so we want to now sort based on health
|
|
if srvI.Health.Healthy == srvJ.Health.Healthy {
|
|
if srvI.Health.StableSince.Before(srvJ.Health.StableSince) {
|
|
return srvI.Health.Healthy
|
|
} else if srvJ.Health.StableSince.Before(srvI.Health.StableSince) {
|
|
return !srvI.Health.Healthy
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// with all else equal sort by the IDs
|
|
return id1 < id2
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// one of the two isn't healthy. We consider the healthy one as less than
|
|
// the other. So we return true if server I is healthy and false if it isn't
|
|
// as we know that server J is healthy and thus should come before server I.
|
|
return srvI.Health.Healthy
|
|
}
|