mirror of
https://github.com/status-im/consul.git
synced 2025-01-10 05:45:46 +00:00
59394e4aa2
Avoid HTTP redirects for internal site links by updating old URLs to point to the new location for the target content.
158 lines
7.3 KiB
Plaintext
158 lines
7.3 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
layout: docs
|
|
page_title: Connect - Native Application Integration
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Applications can natively integrate with the Connect API to support accepting
|
|
and establishing connections to other Connect services without the overhead of
|
|
a proxy sidecar.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Connect-Native App Integration
|
|
|
|
~> **Note:** The Native App Integration does not support many of the Connect service
|
|
mesh features, and is not under active development.
|
|
The [Envoy proxy](/docs/connect/proxies/envoy) should be used for most production
|
|
environments.
|
|
|
|
Applications can natively integrate with the Connect API to support accepting
|
|
and establishing connections to other Connect services without the overhead of a
|
|
[proxy sidecar](/docs/connect/proxies). This option is especially useful
|
|
for applications that may be experiencing performance issues with the proxy
|
|
sidecar deployment. This page will cover the high-level overview of
|
|
integration, registering the service, etc. For language-specific examples, see
|
|
the sidebar navigation to the left. It is also required if your service uses
|
|
relies on a dynamic set of upstream services.
|
|
|
|
Connect is just basic mutual TLS. This means that almost any application
|
|
can easily integrate with Connect. There is no custom protocol in use;
|
|
any language that supports TLS can accept and establish Connect-based
|
|
connections.
|
|
|
|
We currently provide an easy-to-use [Go integration](/docs/connect/native/go)
|
|
to assist with the getting the proper certificates, verifying connections,
|
|
etc. We plan to add helper libraries for other languages in the future.
|
|
However, without library support, it is still possible for any major language
|
|
to integrate with Connect.
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
The primary work involved in natively integrating with Connect is
|
|
[acquiring the proper TLS certificate](/api/agent/connect#service-leaf-certificate),
|
|
[verifying TLS certificates](/api/agent/connect#certificate-authority-ca-roots),
|
|
and [authorizing inbound connections or requests](/api/connect/intentions#list-matching-intentions).
|
|
|
|
All of this is done using the Consul HTTP APIs linked above.
|
|
|
|
An overview of the sequence is shown below. The diagram and the following
|
|
details may seem complex, but this is a _regular mutual TLS connection_ with
|
|
an API call to verify the incoming client certificate.
|
|
|
|
![Native Integration Overview](/img/connect-native-overview.png)
|
|
|
|
-> **Note:** This diagram depicts the simpler networking layer 4 (e.g. TCP) [integration
|
|
mechanism](/api/agent/connect#authorize).
|
|
|
|
Details on the steps are below:
|
|
|
|
- **Service discovery** - This is normal service discovery using Consul,
|
|
a static IP, or any other mechanism. If you're using Consul DNS, the
|
|
[`<service>.connect`](/docs/discovery/dns#connect-capable-service-lookups)
|
|
syntax to find Connect-capable endpoints for a service. After service
|
|
discovery, choose one address from the list of **service addresses**.
|
|
|
|
- **Mutual TLS** - As a client, connect to the discovered service address
|
|
over normal TLS. As part of the TLS connection, provide the
|
|
[service certificate](/api/agent/connect#service-leaf-certificate)
|
|
as the client certificate. Verify the remote certificate against the
|
|
[public CA roots](/api/agent/connect#certificate-authority-ca-roots).
|
|
As a client, if the connection is established then you've established
|
|
a Connect-based connection and there are no further steps!
|
|
|
|
- **Authorization** - As a server accepting connections, verify the client
|
|
certificate against the [public CA
|
|
roots](/api/agent/connect#certificate-authority-ca-roots). After verifying
|
|
the certificate, parse some basic fields from it and use those to determine
|
|
if the connection should be allowed. How this is done is dependent on
|
|
the level of integration desired:
|
|
|
|
- **Simple integration (TCP-only)** - Call the [authorizing
|
|
API](/api/agent/connect#authorize) against the local agent. If this returns
|
|
successfully, complete the TLS handshake and establish the connection. If
|
|
authorization fails, close the connection.
|
|
|
|
-> **NOTE:** This API call is expected to be called in the connection path,
|
|
so if the local Consul agent is down or unresponsive it will effect the
|
|
success rate of new connections. The agent uses locally cached data to
|
|
authorize the connection and typically responds in microseconds. Therefore,
|
|
the impact to the TLS handshake is typically microseconds.
|
|
|
|
- **Complete integration** - Like how the calls to acquire the leaf
|
|
certificate and CA roots are expected to be done out of band and reused, so
|
|
should the [intention match
|
|
API](/api/connect/intentions#list-matching-intentions). With all of the
|
|
relevant intentions cached for the destination, all enforcement operations
|
|
can be done entirely by the service without calling any Consul APIs in the
|
|
connection or request path. If the service is networking layer 7 (e.g.
|
|
HTTP) aware it can safely enforce intentions per _request_ instead of the
|
|
coarser per _connection_ model.
|
|
|
|
## Updating Certificates and Certificate Roots
|
|
|
|
The leaf certificate and CA roots can be updated at any time and the
|
|
natively integrated application must react to this relatively quickly
|
|
so that new connections are not disrupted. This can be done through
|
|
Consul blocking queries (HTTP long polling) or through periodic polling.
|
|
|
|
The API calls for
|
|
[acquiring a leaf TLS certificate](/api/agent/connect#service-leaf-certificate)
|
|
and [reading CA roots](/api/agent/connect#certificate-authority-ca-roots)
|
|
both support
|
|
[blocking queries](/api/features/blocking). By using blocking
|
|
queries, an application can efficiently wait for an updated value. For example,
|
|
the leaf certificate API will block until the certificate is near expiration
|
|
or the signing certificates have changed and will issue and return a new
|
|
certificate.
|
|
|
|
In some languages, using blocking queries may not be simple. In that case,
|
|
we still recommend using the blocking query parameters but with a very short
|
|
`timeout` value set. Doing this is documented with
|
|
[blocking queries](/api/features/blocking). The low timeout will
|
|
ensure the API responds quickly. We recommend that applications poll the
|
|
certificate endpoints frequently, such as multiple times per minute.
|
|
|
|
The overhead for the blocking queries (long or periodic polling) is minimal.
|
|
The API calls are to the local agent and the local agent uses locally
|
|
cached data multiplexed over a single TCP connection to the Consul leader.
|
|
Even if a single machine has 1,000 Connect-enabled services all blocking
|
|
on certificate updates, this translates to only one TCP connection to the
|
|
Consul server.
|
|
|
|
Some language libraries such as the
|
|
[Go library](/docs/connect/native/go) automatically handle updating
|
|
and locally caching the certificates.
|
|
|
|
## Service Registration
|
|
|
|
Connect-native applications must tell Consul that they support Connect
|
|
natively. This enables the service to be returned as part of service
|
|
discovery for Connect-capable services, used by other Connect-native applications
|
|
and client [proxies](/docs/connect/proxies).
|
|
|
|
This can be specified directly in the [service definition](/docs/discovery/services):
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"service": {
|
|
"name": "redis",
|
|
"port": 8000,
|
|
"connect": {
|
|
"native": true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Services that support Connect natively are still returned through the standard
|
|
service discovery mechanisms in addition to the Connect-only service discovery
|
|
mechanisms.
|