Looks like something got munged at some point. Not sure how it slipped in, but my best guess is that because TestTxn_Apply_ACLDeny is marked flaky we didn't block merge because it failed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* mogify needed pbcommon structs
* mogify needed pbconnect structs
* fix compilation errors and make config_translate_test pass
* add missing file
* remove redundant oss func declaration
* fix EnterpriseMeta to copy the right data for enterprise
* rename pbcommon package to pbcommongogo
* regenerate proto and mog files
* add missing mog files
* add pbcommon package
* pbcommon no mog
* fix enterprise meta code generation
* fix enterprise meta code generation (pbcommongogo)
* fix mog generation for gogo
* use `protoc-go-inject-tag` to inject tags
* rename proto package
* pbcommon no mog
* use `protoc-go-inject-tag` to inject tags
* add non gogo proto to make file
* fix proto get
This extends the acl.AllowAuthorizer with source of authority information.
The next step is to unify the AllowAuthorizer and ACLResolveResult structures; that will be done in a separate PR.
Part of #12481
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
Introduces the capability to configure TLS differently for Consul's
listeners/ports (i.e. HTTPS, gRPC, and the internal multiplexed RPC
port) which is useful in scenarios where you may want the HTTPS or
gRPC interfaces to present a certificate signed by a well-known/public
CA, rather than the certificate used for internal communication which
must have a SAN in the form `server.<dc>.consul`.
Give the user a hint that they might be doing something wrong if their GET
request has a non-empty body, which can easily happen using curl's
--data-urlencode if specifying request type via "--request GET" rather than
"--get". See https://github.com/hashicorp/consul/issues/11471.
Currently the config_entry.go subsystem delegates authorization decisions via the ConfigEntry interface CanRead and CanWrite code. Unfortunately this returns a true/false value and loses the details of the source.
This is not helpful, especially since it the config subsystem can be more complex to understand, since it covers so many domains.
This refactors CanRead/CanWrite to return a structured error message (PermissionDenied or the like) with more details about the reason for denial.
Part of #12241
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* First pass for helper for bulk changes
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Convert ACLRead and ACLWrite to new form
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* AgentRead and AgentWRite
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Fix EventWrite
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* KeyRead, KeyWrite, KeyList
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* KeyRing
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* NodeRead NodeWrite
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* OperatorRead and OperatorWrite
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* PreparedQuery
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Intention partial
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Fix ServiceRead, Write ,etc
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Error check ServiceRead?
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Fix Sessionread/Write
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Fixup snapshot ACL
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Error fixups for txn
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* Fixup review comments
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
Prior to this PR for the envoy xDS golden tests in the agent/xds package we
were hand-creating a proxycfg.ConfigSnapshot structure in the proper format for
input to the xDS generator. Over time this intermediate structure has gotten
trickier to build correctly for the various tests.
This PR proposes to switch to using the existing mechanism for turning a
structs.NodeService and a sequence of cache.UpdateEvent copies into a
proxycfg.ConfigSnapshot, as that is less error prone to construct and aligns
more with how the data arrives.
NOTE: almost all of this is in test-related code. I tried super hard to craft
correct event inputs to get the golden files to be the same, or similar enough
after construction to feel ok that i recreated the spirit of the original test
cases.
Improves tests from #12362
These tests try to setup the following concurrent scenario:
1. (goroutine 1) execute read RPC with index=0
2. (goroutine 1) get response from (1) @ index=10
3. (goroutine 1) execute read RPC with index=10 and block
4. (goroutine 2) WHILE (3) is blocking, start slamming the system with stray writes that will cause the WatchSet to wakeup
5. (goroutine 2) after doing all writes, shut down the reader above
6. (goroutine 1) stops reading, double checks that it only ever woke up once (from 1)
Minor fix for behavior in #12362
IsDefault sometimes returns true even if there was a proxy-defaults or service-defaults config entry that was consulted. This PR fixes that.
before:
$ go test ./agent/consul -run TestLeader_ReapOrLeftMember_IgnoreSelf
ok github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/consul 21.147s
after:
$ go test ./agent/consul -run TestLeader_ReapOrLeftMember_IgnoreSelf
ok github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/consul 5.402s
Previously we were using two different criteria to decide where to run a
test. The main `go-test` job would skip Vault tests based on the
presence of the `vault` binary, but the `test-connect-ca-providers` job
would run tests based on the name.
This led to a scenario where a test may never run in CI.
To fix this problem I added a name check to the function we use to skip
the test. This should ensure that any test that requires vault is named
correctly to be run as part of the `test-connect-ca-providers` job.
At the same time I relaxed the regex we use. I verified this runs the
same tests using `go test --list Vault`. I made this change because a
bunch of tests in `agent/connect/ca` used `Vault` in the name, without
the underscores. Instead of changing a bunch of test names, this seemed
easier.
With this approach, the worst case is that we run a few extra tests in
the `test-connect-ca-providers` job, which doesn't seem like a problem.
Starting from and extending the mechanism introduced in #12110 we can specially handle the 3 main special Consul RPC endpoints that react to many config entries in a single blocking query in Connect:
- `DiscoveryChain.Get`
- `ConfigEntry.ResolveServiceConfig`
- `Intentions.Match`
All of these will internally watch for many config entries, and at least one of those will likely be not found in any given query. Because these are blends of multiple reads the exact solution from #12110 isn't perfectly aligned, but we can tweak the approach slightly and regain the utility of that mechanism.
### No Config Entries Found
In this case, despite looking for many config entries none may be found at all. Unlike #12110 in this scenario we do not return an empty reply to the caller, but instead synthesize a struct from default values to return. This can be handled nearly identically to #12110 with the first 1-2 replies being non-empty payloads followed by the standard spurious wakeup suppression mechanism from #12110.
### No Change Since Last Wakeup
Once a blocking query loop on the server has completed and slept at least once, there is a further optimization we can make here to detect if any of the config entries that were present at specific versions for the prior execution of the loop are identical for the loop we just woke up for. In that scenario we can return a slightly different internal sentinel error and basically externally handle it similar to #12110.
This would mean that even if 20 discovery chain read RPC handling goroutines wakeup due to the creation of an unrelated config entry, the only ones that will terminate and reply with a blob of data are those that genuinely have new data to report.
### Extra Endpoints
Since this pattern is pretty reusable, other key config-entry-adjacent endpoints used by `agent/proxycfg` also were updated:
- `ConfigEntry.List`
- `Internal.IntentionUpstreams` (tproxy)
Many places in consul already treated node names case insensitively.
The state store indexes already do it, but there are a few places that
did a direct byte comparison which have now been corrected.
One place of particular consideration is ensureCheckIfNodeMatches
which is executed during snapshot restore (among other places). If a
node check used a slightly different casing than the casing of the node
during register then the snapshot restore here would deterministically
fail. This has been fixed.
Primary approach:
git grep -i "node.*[!=]=.*node" -- ':!*_test.go' ':!docs'
git grep -i '\[[^]]*member[^]]*\]
git grep -i '\[[^]]*\(member\|name\|node\)[^]]*\]' -- ':!*_test.go' ':!website' ':!ui' ':!agent/proxycfg/testing.go:' ':!*.md'
There are some cross-config-entry relationships that are enforced during
"graph validation" at persistence time that are required to be
maintained. This means that config entries may form a digraph at times.
Config entry replication procedes in a particular sorted order by kind
and name.
Occasionally there are some fixups to these digraphs that end up
replicating in the wrong order and replicating the leaves
(ingress-gateway) before the roots (service-defaults) leading to
replication halting due to a graph validation error related to things
like mismatched service protocol requirements.
This PR changes replication to give each computed change (upsert/delete)
a fair shot at being applied before deciding to terminate that round of
replication in error. In the case where we've simply tried to do the
operations in the wrong order at least ONE of the outstanding requests
will complete in the right order, leading the subsequent round to have
fewer operations to do, with a smaller likelihood of graph validation
errors.
This does not address all scenarios, but for scenarios where the edits
are being applied in the wrong order this should avoid replication
halting.
Fixes#9319
The scenario that is NOT ADDRESSED by this PR is as follows:
1. create: service-defaults: name=new-web, protocol=http
2. create: service-defaults: name=old-web, protocol=http
3. create: service-resolver: name=old-web, redirect-to=new-web
4. delete: service-resolver: name=old-web
5. update: service-defaults: name=old-web, protocol=grpc
6. update: service-defaults: name=new-web, protocol=grpc
7. create: service-resolver: name=old-web, redirect-to=new-web
If you shutdown dc2 just before (4) and turn it back on after (7)
replication is impossible as there is no single edit you can make to
make forward progress.
Mark Anderson
Dhia Ayachi
Dan Upton
FFMMM
Evan Culver
Jared Kirschner
Jared Kirschner
Eric
mrspanishviking
trujillo-adam
Eric Haberkorn
R.B. Boyer
Daniel Nephin
Daniel Nephin
Jorge Marey
Chris S. Kim
Evan Culver
Daniele Vazzola