Commit Graph

22 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matt Keeler f74d0cef7a
Implement/Utilize secrets for Peering Replication Stream (#13977) 2022-08-01 10:33:18 -04:00
freddygv b544ce6485 Add ACL enforcement to peering endpoints 2022-07-25 09:34:29 -06:00
Nitya Dhanushkodi f47319b7c6
update generate token endpoint to take external addresses (#13844)
Update generate token endpoint (rpc, http, and api module)

If ServerExternalAddresses are set, it will override any addresses gotten from the "consul" service, and be used in the token instead, and dialed by the dialer. This allows for setting up a load balancer for example, in front of the consul servers.
2022-07-21 14:56:11 -07:00
alex b7043f7150
peering: add warning about AllowStaleRead (#13768) 2022-07-15 09:56:33 -07:00
R.B. Boyer f1cc185335
proto: add package prefixes for all proto files where it is safe (#13735)
We cannot do this for "subscribe" and "partition" this easily without
breakage so those are omitted.

Any protobuf message passed around via an Any construct will have the
fully qualified package name embedded in the protobuf as a string. Also
RPC method dispatch will include the package of the service during
serialization.

- We will be passing pbservice and pbpeering through an Any as part of
  peer stream replication.

- We will be exposing two new gRPC services via pbpeering and
  pbpeerstream.
2022-07-13 11:03:27 -05:00
R.B. Boyer af04851637
peering: move peer replication to the external gRPC port (#13698)
Peer replication is intended to be between separate Consul installs and
effectively should be considered "external". This PR moves the peer
stream replication bidirectional RPC endpoint to the external gRPC
server and ensures that things continue to function.
2022-07-08 12:01:13 -05:00
Chris S. Kim f07132dacc
Revise possible states for a peering. (#13661)
These changes are primarily for Consul's UI, where we want to be more
specific about the state a peering is in.

- The "initial" state was renamed to pending, and no longer applies to
  peerings being established from a peering token.

- Upon request to establish a peering from a peering token, peerings
  will be set as "establishing". This will help distinguish between the
  two roles: the cluster that generates the peering token and the
  cluster that establishes the peering.

- When marked for deletion, peering state will be set to "deleting".
  This way the UI determines the deletion via the state rather than the
  "DeletedAt" field.

Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
2022-07-04 10:47:58 -04:00
alex cd9ca4290a
peering: add imported/exported counts to peering (#13644)
Signed-off-by: acpana <8968914+acpana@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
2022-06-29 14:07:30 -07:00
R.B. Boyer 201d1458c3
xds: mesh gateways now have their own leaf certificate when involved in a peering (#13460)
This is only configured in xDS when a service with an L7 protocol is
exported.

They also load any relevant trust bundles for the peered services to
eventually use for L7 SPIFFE validation during mTLS termination.
2022-06-15 14:36:18 -05:00
freddygv cc921a9c78 Update peering state and RPC for deferred deletion
When deleting a peering we do not want to delete the peering and all
imported data in a single operation, since deleting a large amount of
data at once could overload Consul.

Instead we defer deletion of peerings so that:

1. When a peering deletion request is received via gRPC the peering is
   marked for deletion by setting the DeletedAt field.

2. A leader routine will monitor for peerings that are marked for
   deletion and kick off a throttled deletion of all imported resources
   before deleting the peering itself.

This commit mostly addresses point #1 by modifying the peering service
to mark peerings for deletion. Another key change is to add a
PeeringListDeleted state store function which can return all peerings
marked for deletion. This function is what will be watched by the
deferred deletion leader routine.
2022-06-13 12:10:32 -06:00
Chris S. Kim a02e9abcc1
Update RBAC to handle imported services (#13404)
When converting from Consul intentions to xds RBAC rules, services imported from other peers must encode additional data like partition (from the remote cluster) and trust domain.

This PR updates the PeeringTrustBundle to hold the sending side's local partition as ExportedPartition. It also updates RBAC code to encode SpiffeIDs of imported services with the ExportedPartition and TrustDomain.
2022-06-10 17:15:22 -04:00
R.B. Boyer 7001e1151c
peering: rename initiate to establish in the context of the APIs (#13419) 2022-06-10 11:10:46 -05:00
alex bbbc50815a
peering: send leader addr (#13342)
Signed-off-by: acpana <8968914+acpana@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-06-06 10:00:38 -07:00
freddygv 647c57a416 Add agent cache-type for TrustBundleListByService
There are a handful of changes in this commit:
* When querying trust bundles for a service we need to be able to
  specify the namespace of the service.
* The endpoint needs to track the index because the cache watches use
  it.
* Extracted bulk of the endpoint's logic to a state store function
  so that index tracking could be tested more easily.
* Removed check for service existence, deferring that sort of work to ACL authz
* Added the cache type
2022-06-01 17:05:10 -06:00
Freddy 9427700270
[OSS] Add grpc endpoint to fetch a specific trust bundle (#13292)
Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
2022-05-31 09:54:40 -06:00
R.B. Boyer a85b8a4705
api: ensure peering API endpoints do not use protobufs (#13204)
I noticed that the JSON api endpoints for peerings json encodes protobufs directly, rather than converting them into their `api` package equivalents before marshal/unmarshaling them.

I updated this and used `mog` to do the annoying part in the middle. 

Other changes:
- the status enum was converted into the friendlier string form of the enum for readability with tools like `curl`
- some of the `api` library functions were slightly modified to match other similar endpoints in UX (cc: @ndhanushkodi )
- peeringRead returns `nil` if not found
- partitions are NOT inferred from the agent's partition (matching 1.11-style logic)
2022-05-25 13:43:35 -05:00
Matt Keeler 26f4ea3f01
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841)
* Install `buf` instead of `protoc`
* Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code.
* Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc`
* Added a `proto-format` make target.
* Committed the reformatted proto files.
* Added a `proto-lint` make target.
* Integrated proto linting with CI
* Fixed tons of proto linter warnings.
* Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc.
* Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 10:37:52 -04:00
Freddy b38be4c0ed
Patches to peering initiation for POC demo (#13076)
Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
2022-05-13 13:01:00 -06:00
Evan Culver 0fa5e7be5a
peering: add TrustBundleListByService endpoint (#13048) 2022-05-12 15:58:22 -07:00
Evan Culver 88449b1f1b
internal: port RPC glue changes from Enterprise (#13034)
Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
2022-05-11 15:03:07 -07:00
FFMMM 37a1e33834
expose meta tags for peering (#12964) 2022-05-09 13:47:37 -07:00
R.B. Boyer f507f62f3c
peering: initial sync (#12842)
- Add endpoints related to peering: read, list, generate token, initiate peering
- Update node/service/check table indexing to account for peers
- Foundational changes for pushing service updates to a peer
- Plumb peer name through Health.ServiceNodes path

see: ENT-1765, ENT-1280, ENT-1283, ENT-1283, ENT-1756, ENT-1739, ENT-1750, ENT-1679,
     ENT-1709, ENT-1704, ENT-1690, ENT-1689, ENT-1702, ENT-1701, ENT-1683, ENT-1663,
     ENT-1650, ENT-1678, ENT-1628, ENT-1658, ENT-1640, ENT-1637, ENT-1597, ENT-1634,
     ENT-1613, ENT-1616, ENT-1617, ENT-1591, ENT-1588, ENT-1596, ENT-1572, ENT-1555

Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Culver <eculver@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Nitya Dhanushkodi <nitya@hashicorp.com>
2022-04-21 17:34:40 -05:00