Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
R.B. Boyer 9a56eed86c
proto: ensure buf formatter has been applied to protobufs (#13709) 2022-07-11 13:44:51 -05:00
Daniel Upton 37ccbd2826 proxycfg: server-local intentions data source
This is the OSS portion of enterprise PR 2141.

This commit provides a server-local implementation of the `proxycfg.Intentions`
interface that sources data from streaming events.

It adds events for the `service-intentions` config entry type, and then consumes
event streams (via materialized views) for the service's explicit intentions and
any applicable wildcard intentions, merging them into a single list of intentions.

An alternative approach I considered was to consume _all_ intention events (via
`SubjectWildcard`) and filter out the irrelevant ones. This would admittedly
remove some complexity in the `agent/proxycfg-glue` package but at the expense
of considerable overhead from waking potentially many thousands of connect
proxies every time any intention is updated.
2022-07-04 10:48:36 +01:00
Daniel Upton 653b8c4f9d proxycfg: server-local config entry data sources
This is the OSS portion of enterprise PR 2056.

This commit provides server-local implementations of the proxycfg.ConfigEntry
and proxycfg.ConfigEntryList interfaces, that source data from streaming events.

It makes use of the LocalMaterializer type introduced for peering replication,
adding the necessary support for authorization.

It also adds support for "wildcard" subscriptions (within a topic) to the event
publisher, as this is needed to fetch service-resolvers for all services when
configuring mesh gateways.

Currently, events will be emitted for just the ingress-gateway, service-resolver,
and mesh config entry types, as these are the only entries required by proxycfg
— the events will be emitted on topics named IngressGateway, ServiceResolver,
and MeshConfig topics respectively.

Though these events will only be consumed "locally" for now, they can also be
consumed via the gRPC endpoint (confirmed using grpcurl) so using them from
client agents should be a case of swapping the LocalMaterializer for an
RPCMaterializer.
2022-07-04 10:48:36 +01:00