This implements permissive mTLS , which allows toggling services into "permissive" mTLS mode.
Permissive mTLS mode allows incoming "non Consul-mTLS" traffic to be forward unmodified to the application.
* Update service-defaults and proxy-defaults config entries with a MutualTLSMode field
* Update the mesh config entry with an AllowEnablingPermissiveMutualTLS field and implement the necessary validation. AllowEnablingPermissiveMutualTLS must be true to allow changing to MutualTLSMode=permissive, but this does not require that all proxy-defaults and service-defaults are currently in strict mode.
* Update xDS listener config to add a "permissive filter chain" when MutualTLSMode=permissive for a particular service. The permissive filter chain matches incoming traffic by the destination port. If the destination port matches the service port from the catalog, then no mTLS is required and the traffic sent is forwarded unmodified to the application.
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness
This commit includes the following:
Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)
Why:
In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.
Is this safe?
AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
Paul Glass
Ronald
Matt Keeler