- Split examples into sections with headers
- Hide the clipboard on examples as the copied text isn't useful
- Format inline flags as code using backticks
- Split examples into sections with headers
- Hide the clipboard on examples as the copied text isn't useful
- Add an example of supplying data in a heredoc
- Move the flags section to the bottom to clearly separate it from CAS
which also mentions "flags" of a different kind
- Slight re-wording for clarity
* ui: Don't even ask whether we are authorized for a KV...
...just let the actual API tell us in the response, thin-client style.
* Add some similar commenting for previous PRs related to this problem
* Add some less fake API data
* Rename the models class so as to not be confused with JS Proxies
* Rearrange routlets slightly and add some initial outletFor tests
* Move away from a MeshChecks computed property and just use a helper
* Just use ServiceChecks for healthiness filtering for the moment
* Make TProxy cookie configurable
* Amend exposed paths and upstreams so they know about meta AND proxy
* Slight bit of TaggedAddresses refactor while I was checking for `meta` etc
* Document CONSUL_TPROXY_ENABLE
We recently changed the intentions form to take a full model of a dc rather than just the string identifier (so {Name: 'dc', Primary: true} vs just 'dc' in order to know whether the DC is the primary or not.
Unfortunately, we only did this on the global intentions page not the per service intentions page. This makes it impossible to save an intention from the per service intention page (whilst you can still save intentions from the global intention page as normal).
The fix here pretty much copy/pastes the approach taken in the global intention edit template over to the per service intention edit template.
Tests have been added for creation in the per service intention section, which again are pretty much just copied from the global one, unfortunately this didn't exist previously which would have helped prevent this.
- Move AuthDialog to use a Glimmer Component plus native named blocks/slots.
- Unravel the Auth* contextual components, there wasn't a lot of point having them as contextual components and now the AuthDialog (non-view-specific state machine component) can be used entirely separately from the view-specific components (AuthForm and AuthProfile).
- Move all the ACL related components that are in the main app chrome/navigation (our HashicorpConsul component) in our consul-acls sub package/module (which will eventually be loaded on demand only when ACLs are enabled)
`newIntermediate` is always equal to `needsNewIntermediate`, so we can
remove the extra variable and use the original directly.
Also remove the `activeRoot.ID != newActiveRoot.ID` case from an if,
because that case is already checked above, and `needsNewIntermediate` will
already be true in that case.
This condition now reads a lot better:
> Persist a new root if we did not have one before, or if generated a new intermediate.
In the previous commit the single use of this storedRoot was removed.
In this commit the original objective is completed. The
Provider.ActiveRoot is being removed because
1. the secondary should get the active root from the Consul primary DC,
not the provider, so that secondary DCs do not need to communicate
with a provider instance in a different DC.
2. so that the Provider.ActiveRoot interface can be changed without
impacting other code paths.
This method had only one caller, which always looked for the active
root. This commit moves the lookup into the method to reduce the logic
in the one caller.
This is being done in preparation for a larger change. Keeping this
separate so it is easier to see.
The `storedRootID != primaryRoots.ActiveRootID` is being removed because
these can never be different.
The `storedRootID` comes from `provider.ActiveRoot`, the
`primaryRoots.ActiveRootID` comes from the store `CARoot` from the
primary. In both cases the source of the data is the primary DC.
Technically they could be different if someone modified the provider
outside of Consul, but that would break many things, so is not a
supported flow.
If these were out of sync because of ordering of events then the
secondary will soon receive an update to `primaryRoots` and everything
will be sorted out again.
ActiveRoot should not be called from the secondary DC, because there
should not be a requirement to run the same Vault instance in a
secondary DC. SignIntermediate is called in a secondary DC, so it should
not call ActiveRoot
We would also like to change the interface of ActiveRoot so that we can
support using an intermediate cert as the primary CA in Consul. In
preparation for making that change I am reducing the number of calls to
ActiveRoot, so that there are fewer code paths to modify when the
interface changes.
This change required a change to the mockCAServerDelegate we use in
tests. It was returning the RootCert for SignIntermediate, but that is
not an accurate fake of production. In production this would also be a
separate cert.
Jake Herschman
Neena Pemmaraju
Xuan Luo
Preetha
Amier Chery
mrspanishviking
Sujata Roy
Matt Keeler
Amier Chery
Matt Siegel
Jasmine W
Chip Vaughn
Chris S. Kim
Jake Herschman
Krastin Krastev
trujillo-adam
Daniel Upton
Evan Culver
trujillo-adam
John Cowen
Daniel Nephin