Improve clarity of ?keys behaviour.

I read the previous version initially as meaning that it would return a list of keys which have no value set, which I couldn't understand. I think this removes some ambiguity.
This commit is contained in:
Rob Holland 2014-06-13 12:20:24 +01:00
parent 3b12ff3377
commit cca6f83b3a
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ The `Key` is simply the full path of the entry. `Flags` are an opaque
unsigned integer that can be attached to each entry. The use of this is unsigned integer that can be attached to each entry. The use of this is
left totally to the user. Lastly, the `Value` is a base64 key value. left totally to the user. Lastly, the `Value` is a base64 key value.
It is possible to also only list keys without any values by using the It is possible to also only list keys without their values by using the
"?keys" query parameter along with a `GET` request. This will return "?keys" query parameter along with a `GET` request. This will return
a list of the keys under the given prefix. The optional "?separator=" a list of the keys under the given prefix. The optional "?separator="
can be used to list only up to a given separator. can be used to list only up to a given separator.