Merge pull request #10079 from hashicorp/1.9.x-ca-force-skip-xc

[1.9.x] connect/ca: Allow ForceWithoutCrossSigning for all providers

.changelog/9672.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+```release-note:improvement
+cli: added a `-force-without-cross-signing` flag to the `ca set-config` command.
+connect/ca: The ForceWithoutCrossSigning field will now work as expected for CA providers that support cross signing.
+```

agent/consul/leader_connect_ca.go

@@ -887,12 +887,13 @@ func (c *CAManager) UpdateConfiguration(args *structs.CARequest) (reterr error)
 				"You can try again with ForceWithoutCrossSigningSet but this may cause " +
 				"disruption - see documentation for more.")
 		}
-		if !canXSign && args.Config.ForceWithoutCrossSigning {
+		if args.Config.ForceWithoutCrossSigning {
-			c.logger.Warn("current CA doesn't support cross signing but " +
+			c.logger.Warn("ForceWithoutCrossSigning set, CA reconfiguration skipping cross-signing")
-				"CA reconfiguration forced anyway with ForceWithoutCrossSigning")
 		}
 
-		if canXSign {
+		// If ForceWithoutCrossSigning wasn't set, attempt to have the old CA generate a
+		// cross-signed intermediate.
+		if canXSign && !args.Config.ForceWithoutCrossSigning {
 			// Have the old provider cross-sign the new root
 			xcCert, err := oldProvider.CrossSignCA(newRoot)
 			if err != nil {

agent/consul/leader_connect_test.go

@@ -1374,3 +1374,130 @@ func TestLeader_Consul_BadCAConfigShouldntPreventLeaderEstablishment(t *testing.
 	require.NotEmpty(t, rootsList.Roots)
 	require.NotNil(t, activeRoot)
 }
+
+func TestLeader_Consul_ForceWithoutCrossSigning(t *testing.T) {
+	require := require.New(t)
+	dir1, s1 := testServer(t)
+	defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
+	defer s1.Shutdown()
+	codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
+	defer codec.Close()
+
+	waitForLeaderEstablishment(t, s1)
+
+	// Get the current root
+	rootReq := &structs.DCSpecificRequest{
+		Datacenter: "dc1",
+	}
+	var rootList structs.IndexedCARoots
+	require.Nil(msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "ConnectCA.Roots", rootReq, &rootList))
+	require.Len(rootList.Roots, 1)
+	oldRoot := rootList.Roots[0]
+
+	// Update the provider config to use a new private key, which should
+	// cause a rotation.
+	_, newKey, err := connect.GeneratePrivateKey()
+	require.NoError(err)
+	newConfig := &structs.CAConfiguration{
+		Provider: "consul",
+		Config: map[string]interface{}{
+			"LeafCertTTL":    "500ms",
+			"PrivateKey":     newKey,
+			"RootCert":       "",
+			"RotationPeriod": "2160h",
+			"SkipValidate":   true,
+		},
+		ForceWithoutCrossSigning: true,
+	}
+	{
+		args := &structs.CARequest{
+			Datacenter: "dc1",
+			Config:     newConfig,
+		}
+		var reply interface{}
+
+		require.NoError(msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "ConnectCA.ConfigurationSet", args, &reply))
+	}
+
+	// Old root should no longer be active.
+	_, roots, err := s1.fsm.State().CARoots(nil)
+	require.NoError(err)
+	require.Len(roots, 2)
+	for _, r := range roots {
+		if r.ID == oldRoot.ID {
+			require.False(r.Active)
+		} else {
+			require.True(r.Active)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func TestLeader_Vault_ForceWithoutCrossSigning(t *testing.T) {
+	ca.SkipIfVaultNotPresent(t)
+
+	require := require.New(t)
+	testVault := ca.NewTestVaultServer(t)
+	defer testVault.Stop()
+
+	_, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
+		c.Build = "1.9.1"
+		c.PrimaryDatacenter = "dc1"
+		c.CAConfig = &structs.CAConfiguration{
+			Provider: "vault",
+			Config: map[string]interface{}{
+				"Address":             testVault.Addr,
+				"Token":               testVault.RootToken,
+				"RootPKIPath":         "pki-root/",
+				"IntermediatePKIPath": "pki-intermediate/",
+			},
+		}
+	})
+	defer s1.Shutdown()
+	codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
+	defer codec.Close()
+
+	waitForLeaderEstablishment(t, s1)
+
+	// Get the current root
+	rootReq := &structs.DCSpecificRequest{
+		Datacenter: "dc1",
+	}
+	var rootList structs.IndexedCARoots
+	require.Nil(msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "ConnectCA.Roots", rootReq, &rootList))
+	require.Len(rootList.Roots, 1)
+	oldRoot := rootList.Roots[0]
+
+	// Update the provider config to use a new PKI path, which should
+	// cause a rotation.
+	newConfig := &structs.CAConfiguration{
+		Provider: "vault",
+		Config: map[string]interface{}{
+			"Address":             testVault.Addr,
+			"Token":               testVault.RootToken,
+			"RootPKIPath":         "pki-root-2/",
+			"IntermediatePKIPath": "pki-intermediate/",
+		},
+		ForceWithoutCrossSigning: true,
+	}
+	{
+		args := &structs.CARequest{
+			Datacenter: "dc1",
+			Config:     newConfig,
+		}
+		var reply interface{}
+
+		require.NoError(msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "ConnectCA.ConfigurationSet", args, &reply))
+	}
+
+	// Old root should no longer be active.
+	_, roots, err := s1.fsm.State().CARoots(nil)
+	require.NoError(err)
+	require.Len(roots, 2)
+	for _, r := range roots {
+		if r.ID == oldRoot.ID {
+			require.False(r.Active)
+		} else {
+			require.True(r.Active)
+		}
+	}
+}

api/connect_ca.go

@@ -23,6 +23,14 @@ type CAConfig struct {
 	// configuration is an error.
 	State map[string]string
 
+	// ForceWithoutCrossSigning indicates that the CA reconfiguration should go
+	// ahead even if the current CA is unable to cross sign certificates. This
+	// risks temporary connection failures during the rollout as new leafs will be
+	// rejected by proxies that have not yet observed the new root cert but is the
+	// only option if a CA that doesn't support cross signing needs to be
+	// reconfigured or mirated away from.
+	ForceWithoutCrossSigning bool
+
 	CreateIndex uint64
 	ModifyIndex uint64
 }

command/connect/ca/set/connect_ca_set.go

@@ -24,13 +24,20 @@ type cmd struct {
 	help  string
 
 	// flags
-	configFile flags.StringValue
+	configFile               flags.StringValue
+	forceWithoutCrossSigning bool
 }
 
 func (c *cmd) init() {
 	c.flags = flag.NewFlagSet("", flag.ContinueOnError)
 	c.flags.Var(&c.configFile, "config-file",
 		"The path to the config file to use.")
+	c.flags.BoolVar(&c.forceWithoutCrossSigning, "force-without-cross-signing", false,
+		"Indicates that the CA reconfiguration should go ahead even if the current "+
+			"CA is unable to cross sign certificates. This risks temporary connection "+
+			"failures during the rollout as new leafs will be rejected by proxies that "+
+			"have not yet observed the new root cert but is the only option if a CA that "+
+			"doesn't support cross signing needs to be reconfigured or mirated away from.")
 
 	c.http = &flags.HTTPFlags{}
 	flags.Merge(c.flags, c.http.ClientFlags())
@@ -70,6 +77,7 @@ func (c *cmd) Run(args []string) int {
 		c.UI.Error(fmt.Sprintf("Error parsing config file: %s", err))
 		return 1
 	}
+	config.ForceWithoutCrossSigning = c.forceWithoutCrossSigning
 
 	// Set the new configuration.
 	if _, err := client.Connect().CASetConfig(&config, nil); err != nil {

website/content/api-docs/connect/ca.mdx

@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ The table below shows this endpoint's support for
   providers, see [Provider Config](/docs/connect/ca).
 
 - `ForceWithoutCrossSigning` `(bool: <optional>)` - Indicates that the CA change
-  should be force to complete even if the current CA doesn't support cross
+  should be forced to complete even if the current CA doesn't support cross
   signing. Changing root without cross-signing may cause temporary connection
   failures until the rollout completes. See [Forced Rotation Without
   Cross-Signing](/docs/connect/ca#forced-rotation-without-cross-signing)

website/content/commands/connect/ca.mdx

@@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ Usage: `consul connect ca set-config [options]`
   The format of this config file matches the request payload documented in the
   [Update CA Configuration API](/api/connect/ca#update-ca-configuration).
 
+- `-force-without-cross-signing` `(bool: <optional>)` - Indicates that the CA change
+  should be forced to complete even if the current CA doesn't support cross
+  signing. Changing root without cross-signing may cause temporary connection
+  failures until the rollout completes. See [Forced Rotation Without
+  Cross-Signing](/docs/connect/ca#forced-rotation-without-cross-signing)
+  for more detail.
+
 The output looks like this:
 
 ```