ui: Keep track of previous node checks and avoid adding them twice (#9661)

* Keep track of previous node checks and avoid adding them twice
This commit is contained in:
John Cowen 2021-01-29 15:57:47 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent 19fd9a87d1
commit 3477b1de77
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 219 additions and 23 deletions

View File

@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
import Model, { attr, belongsTo } from '@ember-data/model'; import Model, { attr, belongsTo } from '@ember-data/model';
import { fragmentArray } from 'ember-data-model-fragments/attributes'; import { fragmentArray } from 'ember-data-model-fragments/attributes';
import { computed, get, set } from '@ember/object'; import { computed, get } from '@ember/object';
import { or, filter, alias } from '@ember/object/computed'; import { or, filter, alias } from '@ember/object/computed';
import { tracked } from '@glimmer/tracking'; import { tracked } from '@glimmer/tracking';
import mergeChecks from 'consul-ui/utils/merge-checks';
export const PRIMARY_KEY = 'uid'; export const PRIMARY_KEY = 'uid';
export const SLUG_KEY = 'Node.Node,Service.ID'; export const SLUG_KEY = 'Node.Node,Service.ID';
@ -52,29 +53,15 @@ export default class ServiceInstance extends Model {
@filter('Checks.@each.Kind', (item, i, arr) => item.Kind === 'node') NodeChecks; @filter('Checks.@each.Kind', (item, i, arr) => item.Kind === 'node') NodeChecks;
// MeshChecks are a concatenation of Checks for the Instance and Checks for // MeshChecks are a concatenation of Checks for the Instance and Checks for
// the ProxyInstance. Checks is an ember-data-model-fragment, so we can't just // the ProxyInstance.
// concat it, we have to loop through all the items in order to merge @computed('Checks.[]', 'ProxyInstance.{Checks.[],ServiceProxy.Expose.Checks}')
@computed('Checks', 'ProxyInstance{Checks,ServiceProxy.Expose.Checks}')
get MeshChecks() { get MeshChecks() {
return (get(this, 'Checks') || []) // merge the instance and proxy checks together, avoiding duplicate node
.map(item => { // checks and additionally setting any checks to exposed if required
set( return mergeChecks(
item, [get(this, 'Checks'), get(this, 'ProxyInstance.Checks')],
'Exposed', get(this, 'ProxyInstance.ServiceProxy.Expose.Checks')
get(this, 'ProxyInstance.ServiceProxy.Expose.Checks') && get(item, 'Exposable') );
);
return item;
})
.concat(
(get(this, 'ProxyInstance.Checks') || []).map(item => {
set(
item,
'Exposed',
get(this, 'ProxyInstance.ServiceProxy.Expose.Checks') && get(item, 'Exposable')
);
return item;
})
);
} }
@computed('Service.Meta') @computed('Service.Meta')

View File

@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
import { get, set } from '@ember/object';
import MultiMap from 'mnemonist/multi-map';
/**
* Checks are ember-data-model-fragments, so we can't just
* concat it, we have to loop through all the items in order to merge
* We also need to avoid repeating Node checks here as the service and the
* proxy is likely to be on the same node, without adding something extra here
* the node check will likely end up in the list twice.
*
* @param {array} checks - Multiple lists of healthchecks to merge each one of the items in this array should be a further array of healthchecks
* @param {boolean} exposed - Whether the checks should be marked as exposed via the proxy or not
* @param {class} MMap - A MultiMap class. This is only exposed to allow for an easier interface but still allow an innjectable MultiMap if we choose to do that during testing
* @returns {array} - The final array of all of the healthchecks with any duplicate node checks removed, and also marked as exposed if required
*/
export default (checks = [], exposed = false, MMap = MultiMap) => {
const ids = new MMap();
const a = checks.shift();
const result = a
.map(item => {
// its a Node check (ServiceName === ""), record this one so we
// don't end up with duplicates of it
if (item.ServiceName === '') {
ids.set(item.Node, item.CheckID);
}
return item;
})
// go through all remaining lists of checks adding each check to the
// list if its not a node check that has been already added
.concat(
checks.reduce((prev, items) => {
if (typeof items === 'undefined') {
return prev;
}
return prev.concat(
items.reduce((prev, item) => {
if (item.ServiceName === '') {
if ((ids.get(item.Node) || []).includes(item.CheckID)) {
return prev;
}
// if the node check hasn't been added yet, record this one
// so we don't end up with duplicates of it
ids.set(item.Node, item.CheckID);
}
prev.push(item);
return prev;
}, [])
);
}, [])
);
// if checks are exposed via the proxy, find the ones that are exposable
// (ones of a certain type) and set them as exposed
// TODO: consider moving this out of here so we aren't doing too much in one util
if (exposed) {
result
.filter(item => get(item, 'Exposable'))
.forEach(item => {
set(item, 'Exposed', exposed);
});
}
return result;
};

View File

@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
import mergeChecks from 'consul-ui/utils/merge-checks';
import { module, test } from 'qunit';
module('Unit | Utility | merge-checks', function() {
test('it works', function(assert) {
[
{
desc: 'One list of checks, not exposed',
exposed: false,
checks: [
[
{
ServiceName: 'service-0',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: false,
},
],
],
expected: [
{
ServiceName: 'service-0',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: false,
},
],
},
{
desc: 'One list of checks, exposed',
exposed: true,
checks: [
[
{
ServiceName: 'service-0',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
],
],
expected: [
{
ServiceName: 'service-0',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
Exposed: true,
},
],
},
{
desc: 'Two lists of checks, not exposed',
exposed: false,
checks: [
[
{
ServiceName: 'service-0',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
],
[
{
ServiceName: 'service-0-proxy',
CheckID: 'service-0-proxy-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
],
],
expected: [
{
ServiceName: 'service-0',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
{
ServiceName: 'service-0-proxy',
CheckID: 'service-0-proxy-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
],
},
{
desc: 'Two lists of checks, with one duplicate node checks, not exposed',
exposed: false,
checks: [
[
{
ServiceName: 'service-0',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
{
ServiceName: '',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-1',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
],
[
{
ServiceName: 'service-0-proxy',
CheckID: 'service-0-proxy-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
{
ServiceName: '',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-1',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
],
],
expected: [
{
ServiceName: 'service-0',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
{
ServiceName: '',
CheckID: 'service-0-check-1',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
{
ServiceName: 'service-0-proxy',
CheckID: 'service-0-proxy-check-0',
Node: 'node-0',
Exposable: true,
},
],
},
].forEach(spec => {
const actual = mergeChecks(spec.checks, spec.exposed);
assert.deepEqual(actual, spec.expected);
});
});
});