diff --git a/test-integ/README.md b/test-integ/README.md index ebc611efa2..1f8f97649d 100644 --- a/test-integ/README.md +++ b/test-integ/README.md @@ -1,3 +1,201 @@ # test-integ -Go integration tests for consul. `/test/integration` also holds integration tests; they need migrating. \ No newline at end of file +Go integration tests for consul. `/test/integration` also holds integration tests; they need migrating. + +These should use the [testing/deployer framework](../testing/deployer) to bring +up some local testing infrastructure and fixtures to run test assertions against. + +Where reasonably possible, try to bring up infrastructure interesting enough to +be able to run many related sorts of test against it, rather than waiting for +many similar clusters to be provisioned and torn down. This will help ensure +that the integration tests do not consume CPU cycles needlessly. + +## Prerequisites + +Before you can run these tests, a fresh dev build should be created and tagged +for automatic use by tests using `utils.TargetImages()`. This can be done by +the toplevel consul make target: + + make test-deployer-setup + +You can run the entire set of deployer integration tests using: + + make test-deployer # everything except peering_commontopo + make test-deployer-peering # just peering_commontopo + +You can also run them one by one if you like: + + go test ./catalogv2 -run TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations -v + +You can have the logs stream unbuffered directly to your terminal which can +help diagnose stuck tests that would otherwise need to fully timeout before the +logs would print by also setting the `NOLOGBUFFER=1` environment variable. + +## Getting started + +Deployer tests have three main parts: + +1. Declarative topology description. +2. Launching the infrastructure defined by that description. +3. Making test assertions about the infrastructure. + +Some tests may also have an optional _mutation_ phase followed by additional +assertions. These are only needed if the test needs to observe a reaction in +the system to a change in the environment or configuration. + +### Topology description + +Test authors craft a declarative description of the infrastructure necessary to exist for the test. +These are also referred to as a "topology". + +These are comprised of 4 main parts: + +- **Images**: The set of docker images and specific versions that will be used + by default if not overridden on each Cluster or Node. + + - Consul CE + - Consul Enterprise + - Consul Dataplane + - Envoy Proxy + +- **Networks**: The non-overlapping networks that should exist for use by the Clusters. + +- **Clusters**: The unique Consul clusters that should exist. + + - **Nodes**: A "box with ip address(es)". This should feel a bit like a VM or + a Kubernetes Pod as an enclosing entity. + + - **Services/Workloads**: The list of service instances (v1) or workloads + (v2) that will execute on the given node. v2 + Services will be implied by similarly named + workloads here unless opted out. This helps + define a v1-compatible topology and repurpose it + for v2 without reworking it. + + - **Services** (v2): v2 Service definitions to define explicitly, in addition + to the inferred ones. + + - **InitialConfigEntries** (v1): Config entries that should be created as + part of the fixture and that make sense to + include as part of the test definition, + rather than something created during the + test assertion phase. + + - **InitialResources** (v2): v2 Resources that should be created as part of + the fixture and that make sense to include as + part of the test definition, rather than + something created during the test assertion + phase. + +- **Peerings**: The peering relationships between Clusters to establish. + +In the [topoutil](./topoutil) package there are some helpers for defining +common sets of nodes or services like Consul Servers, Mesh Gateways, or [fortio +servers](https://github.com/fortio/fortio) + +#### Useful topology concepts + +Consul has a lot of independent configurables that can greatly increase the +testing configuration space required to flush out any bugs. The topology +definition was designed to be easily "exploded" to create testing microcosms on +a variety of axes: + +- agentful (clients) vs agentless (dataplane) +- tenancies (partitions, namespaces) +- locally or across a peering +- catalog v1 or v2 object model + +Since the topology is just a declarative struct, a test author could rewrite +any one of these attributes with a single field (such as `Node.Kind` or +`Node.Version`) and cause the identical test to run against the other +configuration. With the addition of a few `if enterprise {}` blocks and `for` +loops, a test author could easily write one test of a behavior and execute it +to cover agentless, agentful, non-default tenancy, and v1/v2 in a few extra +lines of code. + +#### Non-optional security settings + +The test framework always enables ACLs in default deny mode and provisions +minimal-permission tokens automatically to the various containers that need +them. + +TLS certificates are similarly minted and distributed to all components that +need them. + +### Launching a topology + +There is a [sprawltest](../testing/deployer/sprawl/sprawltest) package that has +utilities to bring up a topology in the context of a Go test. This is basically a one-liner: + + sp := sprawltest.Launch(t, config) + +After this line returns you will have a handle (`sp`) to the running cluster +and can use it to get ready-made api clients, http clients, gRPC resource +client, or test sockets open to a variety of the topology components for use in +authoring test code. + +This helper will rig up a `t.Cleanup` handler that will destroy all resources +created during the test. This can be opted-out of by setting the +`SPRAWL_KEEP_RUNNING=1` environment variable before running the tests. + +### Test assertions + +Typical service mesh tests want to ensure that use of a service from another +service behaves in a certain way. Because the entire set of components is known +declaratively, we can process it into a flat list of known source/destination +relationships: + + ships := topology.ComputeRelationships() + +This works hand-in-hand with the topology concepts mentioned above to +programmatically verify independent subunits of a topology that may exist (this +is helpful for things like testing multiple tenancy configurations without +duplicating all of the assertion code). + +This can also be pretty printed to the log for diagnostic purposes with: + + t.Log(topology.RenderRelationships(ships)) + +Which looks like this: + + $ NOLOGBUFFER=1 go test ./catalogv2/ -run TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations -v + ...(skipping a bunch of output)... + 2023-11-08T11:48:04.395-0600 [INFO] TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations: topology is ready for use: elapsed=33.510298357s + explicit_destinations_test.go:55: DOWN |node |service |port |UP |service | + dc1 |default/dc1-box2 |default/default/single-client |5000 |dc1 |default/default/single-server | + dc1 |default/dc1-box4 |default/default/multi-client |5000 |dc1 |default/default/multi-server | + dc1 |default/dc1-box4 |default/default/multi-client |5001 |dc1 |default/default/multi-server | + | | | | | | + + === RUN TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations/relationship:_default/default/single-client_on_default/dc1-box2_in_dc1_via_:5000_=>_default/default/single-server_in_dc1_port_http + service.go:224: making call to http://10.238.170.5:5000 + service.go:245: ...got response code 200 + === RUN TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations/relationship:_default/default/multi-client_on_default/dc1-box4_in_dc1_via_:5000_=>_default/default/multi-server_in_dc1_port_http + service.go:224: making call to http://10.238.170.7:5000 + service.go:245: ...got response code 200 + === RUN TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations/relationship:_default/default/multi-client_on_default/dc1-box4_in_dc1_via_:5001_=>_default/default/multi-server_in_dc1_port_http-alt + service.go:224: making call to http://10.238.170.7:5001 + service.go:245: ...got response code 200 + 2023-11-08T11:48:04.420-0600 [INFO] TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations.tfgen: Running 'terraform destroy'... + --- PASS: TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations (40.60s) + --- PASS: TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations/relationship:_default/default/single-client_on_default/dc1-box2_in_dc1_via_:5000_=>_default/default/single-server_in_dc1_port_http (0.01s) + --- PASS: TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations/relationship:_default/default/multi-client_on_default/dc1-box4_in_dc1_via_:5000_=>_default/default/multi-server_in_dc1_port_http (0.01s) + --- PASS: TestBasicL4ExplicitDestinations/relationship:_default/default/multi-client_on_default/dc1-box4_in_dc1_via_:5001_=>_default/default/multi-server_in_dc1_port_http-alt (0.01s) + PASS + ok github.com/hashicorp/consul/test-integ/catalogv2 40.612s + +There is a ready-made helper to assist with making common inquiries to Consul +and Envoy that you can create in your test: + + asserter := topoutil.NewAsserter(sp) + + asserter.UpstreamEndpointStatus(t, svc, clusterPrefix+".", "HEALTHY", 1) + +## Examples + +- `catalogv2` + - [Explicit L4 destinations](./catalogv2/explicit_destinations_test.go) + - [Implicit L4 destinations](./catalogv2/implicit_destinations_test.go) + - [Explicit L7 destinations with traffic splits](./catalogv2/explicit_destinations_l7_test.go) +- [`peering_commontopo`](./peering_commontopo) + - A variety of extensive v1 Peering tests.