consul/proto/private/pbservice/node.pb.go

805 lines
37 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
[COMPLIANCE] License changes (#18443) * Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository. * Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository. * Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at <Blog URL>, FAQ at www.hashicorp.com/licensing-faq, and details of the license at www.hashicorp.com/bsl. * add missing license headers * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 --------- Co-authored-by: hashicorp-copywrite[bot] <110428419+hashicorp-copywrite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-08-11 13:12:13 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
// Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT.
// versions:
// protoc-gen-go v1.33.0
// protoc (unknown)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
// source: private/pbservice/node.proto
package pbservice
import (
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
pbcommon "github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto/private/pbcommon"
protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
protoimpl "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoimpl"
reflect "reflect"
sync "sync"
)
const (
// Verify that this generated code is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(20 - protoimpl.MinVersion)
// Verify that runtime/protoimpl is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(protoimpl.MaxVersion - 20)
)
// IndexedCheckServiceNodes is used to return multiple instances for a given service.
type IndexedCheckServiceNodes struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
Index uint64 `protobuf:"varint,1,opt,name=Index,proto3" json:"Index,omitempty"`
Nodes []*CheckServiceNode `protobuf:"bytes,2,rep,name=Nodes,proto3" json:"Nodes,omitempty"`
}
func (x *IndexedCheckServiceNodes) Reset() {
*x = IndexedCheckServiceNodes{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[0]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *IndexedCheckServiceNodes) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*IndexedCheckServiceNodes) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *IndexedCheckServiceNodes) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[0]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use IndexedCheckServiceNodes.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*IndexedCheckServiceNodes) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{0}
}
func (x *IndexedCheckServiceNodes) GetIndex() uint64 {
if x != nil {
return x.Index
}
return 0
}
func (x *IndexedCheckServiceNodes) GetNodes() []*CheckServiceNode {
if x != nil {
return x.Nodes
}
return nil
}
// CheckServiceNode is used to provide the node, its service
// definition, as well as a HealthCheck that is associated.
type CheckServiceNode struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
Node *Node `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=Node,proto3" json:"Node,omitempty"`
Service *NodeService `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=Service,proto3" json:"Service,omitempty"`
Checks []*HealthCheck `protobuf:"bytes,3,rep,name=Checks,proto3" json:"Checks,omitempty"`
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
func (x *CheckServiceNode) Reset() {
*x = CheckServiceNode{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[1]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *CheckServiceNode) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*CheckServiceNode) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *CheckServiceNode) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[1]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use CheckServiceNode.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*CheckServiceNode) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{1}
}
func (x *CheckServiceNode) GetNode() *Node {
if x != nil {
return x.Node
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return nil
}
func (x *CheckServiceNode) GetService() *NodeService {
if x != nil {
return x.Service
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return nil
}
func (x *CheckServiceNode) GetChecks() []*HealthCheck {
if x != nil {
return x.Checks
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return nil
}
// Node contains information about a node.
//
// mog annotation:
//
// target=github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/structs.Node
// output=node.gen.go
// name=Structs
type Node struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
// mog: func-to=NodeIDType func-from=string
ID string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=ID,proto3" json:"ID,omitempty"`
Node string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=Node,proto3" json:"Node,omitempty"`
Partition string `protobuf:"bytes,8,opt,name=Partition,proto3" json:"Partition,omitempty"`
PeerName string `protobuf:"bytes,9,opt,name=PeerName,proto3" json:"PeerName,omitempty"`
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
Address string `protobuf:"bytes,3,opt,name=Address,proto3" json:"Address,omitempty"`
Datacenter string `protobuf:"bytes,4,opt,name=Datacenter,proto3" json:"Datacenter,omitempty"`
TaggedAddresses map[string]string `protobuf:"bytes,5,rep,name=TaggedAddresses,proto3" json:"TaggedAddresses,omitempty" protobuf_key:"bytes,1,opt,name=key,proto3" protobuf_val:"bytes,2,opt,name=value,proto3"`
Meta map[string]string `protobuf:"bytes,6,rep,name=Meta,proto3" json:"Meta,omitempty" protobuf_key:"bytes,1,opt,name=key,proto3" protobuf_val:"bytes,2,opt,name=value,proto3"`
// mog: func-to=RaftIndexToStructs func-from=NewRaftIndexFromStructs
RaftIndex *pbcommon.RaftIndex `protobuf:"bytes,7,opt,name=RaftIndex,proto3" json:"RaftIndex,omitempty"`
// Locality identifies where the node is running.
// mog: func-to=LocalityToStructs func-from=LocalityFromStructs
Locality *pbcommon.Locality `protobuf:"bytes,10,opt,name=Locality,proto3" json:"Locality,omitempty"`
}
func (x *Node) Reset() {
*x = Node{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[2]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
func (x *Node) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*Node) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *Node) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[2]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use Node.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*Node) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{2}
}
func (x *Node) GetID() string {
if x != nil {
return x.ID
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return ""
}
func (x *Node) GetNode() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Node
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return ""
}
func (x *Node) GetPartition() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Partition
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return ""
}
func (x *Node) GetPeerName() string {
if x != nil {
return x.PeerName
}
return ""
}
func (x *Node) GetAddress() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Address
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return ""
}
func (x *Node) GetDatacenter() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Datacenter
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return ""
}
func (x *Node) GetTaggedAddresses() map[string]string {
if x != nil {
return x.TaggedAddresses
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return nil
}
func (x *Node) GetMeta() map[string]string {
if x != nil {
return x.Meta
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return nil
}
func (x *Node) GetRaftIndex() *pbcommon.RaftIndex {
if x != nil {
return x.RaftIndex
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return nil
}
func (x *Node) GetLocality() *pbcommon.Locality {
if x != nil {
return x.Locality
}
return nil
}
// NodeService is a service provided by a node
//
// mog annotation:
//
// target=github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/structs.NodeService
// output=node.gen.go
// name=Structs
type NodeService struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// Kind is the kind of service this is. Different kinds of services may
// have differing validation, DNS behavior, etc. An empty kind will default
// to the Default kind. See ServiceKind for the full list of kinds.
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
// mog: func-to=structs.ServiceKind func-from=string
Kind string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=Kind,proto3" json:"Kind,omitempty"`
ID string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=ID,proto3" json:"ID,omitempty"`
Service string `protobuf:"bytes,3,opt,name=Service,proto3" json:"Service,omitempty"`
Tags []string `protobuf:"bytes,4,rep,name=Tags,proto3" json:"Tags,omitempty"`
Address string `protobuf:"bytes,5,opt,name=Address,proto3" json:"Address,omitempty"`
// mog: func-to=MapStringServiceAddressToStructs func-from=NewMapStringServiceAddressFromStructs
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
TaggedAddresses map[string]*ServiceAddress `protobuf:"bytes,15,rep,name=TaggedAddresses,proto3" json:"TaggedAddresses,omitempty" protobuf_key:"bytes,1,opt,name=key,proto3" protobuf_val:"bytes,2,opt,name=value,proto3"`
Meta map[string]string `protobuf:"bytes,6,rep,name=Meta,proto3" json:"Meta,omitempty" protobuf_key:"bytes,1,opt,name=key,proto3" protobuf_val:"bytes,2,opt,name=value,proto3"`
// mog: func-to=int func-from=int32
Port int32 `protobuf:"varint,7,opt,name=Port,proto3" json:"Port,omitempty"`
SocketPath string `protobuf:"bytes,17,opt,name=SocketPath,proto3" json:"SocketPath,omitempty"`
// mog: func-to=WeightsPtrToStructs func-from=NewWeightsPtrFromStructs
Weights *Weights `protobuf:"bytes,8,opt,name=Weights,proto3" json:"Weights,omitempty"`
EnableTagOverride bool `protobuf:"varint,9,opt,name=EnableTagOverride,proto3" json:"EnableTagOverride,omitempty"`
// Proxy is the configuration set for Kind = connect-proxy. It is mandatory in
// that case and an error to be set for any other kind. This config is part of
// a proxy service definition and is distinct from but shares some fields with
// the Connect.Proxy which configures a managed proxy as part of the actual
// service's definition. This duplication is ugly but seemed better than the
// alternative which was to re-use the same struct fields for both cases even
// though the semantics are different and the non-shred fields make no sense
// in the other case. ProxyConfig may be a more natural name here, but it's
// confusing for the UX because one of the fields in ConnectProxyConfig is
// also called just "Config"
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
Proxy *ConnectProxyConfig `protobuf:"bytes,11,opt,name=Proxy,proto3" json:"Proxy,omitempty"`
// Connect are the Connect settings for a service. This is purposely NOT
// a pointer so that we never have to nil-check this.
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
Connect *ServiceConnect `protobuf:"bytes,12,opt,name=Connect,proto3" json:"Connect,omitempty"`
// LocallyRegisteredAsSidecar is private as it is only used by a local agent
// state to track if the service was registered from a nested sidecar_service
// block. We need to track that so we can know whether we need to deregister
// it automatically too if it's removed from the service definition or if the
// parent service is deregistered. Relying only on ID would cause us to
// deregister regular services if they happen to be registered using the same
// ID scheme as our sidecars do by default. We could use meta but that gets
// unpleasant because we can't use the consul- prefix from an agent (reserved
// for use internally but in practice that means within the state store or in
// responses only), and it leaks the detail publicly which people might rely
// on which is a bit unpleasant for something that is meant to be config-file
// syntax sugar. Note this is not translated to ServiceNode and friends and
// may not be set on a NodeService that isn't the one the agent registered and
// keeps in it's local state. We never want this rendered in JSON as it's
// internal only. Right now our agent endpoints return api structs which don't
// include it but this is a safety net incase we change that or there is
// somewhere this is used in API output.
LocallyRegisteredAsSidecar bool `protobuf:"varint,13,opt,name=LocallyRegisteredAsSidecar,proto3" json:"LocallyRegisteredAsSidecar,omitempty"`
// mog: func-to=EnterpriseMetaToStructs func-from=NewEnterpriseMetaFromStructs
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta *pbcommon.EnterpriseMeta `protobuf:"bytes,16,opt,name=EnterpriseMeta,proto3" json:"EnterpriseMeta,omitempty"`
PeerName string `protobuf:"bytes,18,opt,name=PeerName,proto3" json:"PeerName,omitempty"`
// mog: func-to=RaftIndexToStructs func-from=NewRaftIndexFromStructs
RaftIndex *pbcommon.RaftIndex `protobuf:"bytes,14,opt,name=RaftIndex,proto3" json:"RaftIndex,omitempty"`
// Locality identifies where the service is running.
// mog: func-to=LocalityToStructs func-from=LocalityFromStructs
Locality *pbcommon.Locality `protobuf:"bytes,19,opt,name=Locality,proto3" json:"Locality,omitempty"`
}
func (x *NodeService) Reset() {
*x = NodeService{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[3]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
func (x *NodeService) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*NodeService) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *NodeService) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[3]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use NodeService.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*NodeService) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{3}
}
func (x *NodeService) GetKind() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Kind
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return ""
}
func (x *NodeService) GetID() string {
if x != nil {
return x.ID
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return ""
}
func (x *NodeService) GetService() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Service
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return ""
}
func (x *NodeService) GetTags() []string {
if x != nil {
return x.Tags
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return nil
}
func (x *NodeService) GetAddress() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Address
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return ""
}
func (x *NodeService) GetTaggedAddresses() map[string]*ServiceAddress {
if x != nil {
return x.TaggedAddresses
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return nil
}
func (x *NodeService) GetMeta() map[string]string {
if x != nil {
return x.Meta
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return nil
}
func (x *NodeService) GetPort() int32 {
if x != nil {
return x.Port
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}
return 0
}
func (x *NodeService) GetSocketPath() string {
if x != nil {
return x.SocketPath
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return ""
}
func (x *NodeService) GetWeights() *Weights {
if x != nil {
return x.Weights
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return nil
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
func (x *NodeService) GetEnableTagOverride() bool {
if x != nil {
return x.EnableTagOverride
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return false
}
func (x *NodeService) GetProxy() *ConnectProxyConfig {
if x != nil {
return x.Proxy
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return nil
}
func (x *NodeService) GetConnect() *ServiceConnect {
if x != nil {
return x.Connect
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return nil
}
func (x *NodeService) GetLocallyRegisteredAsSidecar() bool {
if x != nil {
return x.LocallyRegisteredAsSidecar
}
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
return false
}
func (x *NodeService) GetEnterpriseMeta() *pbcommon.EnterpriseMeta {
if x != nil {
return x.EnterpriseMeta
}
return nil
}
func (x *NodeService) GetPeerName() string {
if x != nil {
return x.PeerName
}
return ""
}
func (x *NodeService) GetRaftIndex() *pbcommon.RaftIndex {
if x != nil {
return x.RaftIndex
}
return nil
}
func (x *NodeService) GetLocality() *pbcommon.Locality {
if x != nil {
return x.Locality
}
return nil
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var File_private_pbservice_node_proto protoreflect.FileDescriptor
var file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDesc = []byte{
0x0a, 0x1c, 0x70, 0x72, 0x69, 0x76, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x62, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76,
0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x6e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x12, 0x21,
0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c,
0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63,
0x65, 0x1a, 0x1d, 0x70, 0x72, 0x69, 0x76, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x62, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d,
0x6d, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x2f, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x6d, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f,
0x1a, 0x23, 0x70, 0x72, 0x69, 0x76, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x62, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76,
0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x68, 0x65, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x74, 0x68, 0x63, 0x68, 0x65, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x2e,
0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x1a, 0x1f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x69, 0x76, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x70,
0x62, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65,
0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x22, 0x7b, 0x0a, 0x18, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x64, 0x65, 0x78, 0x65,
0x64, 0x43, 0x68, 0x65, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64,
0x65, 0x73, 0x12, 0x14, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x64, 0x65, 0x78, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28,
0x04, 0x52, 0x05, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x64, 0x65, 0x78, 0x12, 0x49, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65,
0x73, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x33, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72,
0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x43, 0x68, 0x65, 0x63,
0x6b, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x52, 0x05, 0x4e, 0x6f,
0x64, 0x65, 0x73, 0x22, 0xe1, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x10, 0x43, 0x68, 0x65, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72,
0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x12, 0x3b, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65,
0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x27, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e,
0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x52,
0x04, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x12, 0x48, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65,
0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x2e, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e,
0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x53,
0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x52, 0x07, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x12,
0x46, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x43, 0x68, 0x65, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x73, 0x18, 0x03, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32,
0x2e, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73,
0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x48, 0x65, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x74, 0x68, 0x43, 0x68, 0x65, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x52,
0x06, 0x43, 0x68, 0x65, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x73, 0x22, 0xdd, 0x04, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
0x12, 0x0e, 0x0a, 0x02, 0x49, 0x44, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x02, 0x49, 0x44,
0x12, 0x12, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x04,
0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x12, 0x1c, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x50, 0x61, 0x72, 0x74, 0x69, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f,
0x6e, 0x18, 0x08, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x09, 0x50, 0x61, 0x72, 0x74, 0x69, 0x74, 0x69,
0x6f, 0x6e, 0x12, 0x1a, 0x0a, 0x08, 0x50, 0x65, 0x65, 0x72, 0x4e, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x18, 0x09,
0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x08, 0x50, 0x65, 0x65, 0x72, 0x4e, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x12, 0x18,
0x0a, 0x07, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x18, 0x03, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52,
0x07, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x12, 0x1e, 0x0a, 0x0a, 0x44, 0x61, 0x74, 0x61,
0x63, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x18, 0x04, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0a, 0x44, 0x61,
0x74, 0x61, 0x63, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x12, 0x66, 0x0a, 0x0f, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67, 0x67,
0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x65, 0x73, 0x18, 0x05, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28,
0x0b, 0x32, 0x3c, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65,
0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67, 0x67, 0x65,
0x64, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x65, 0x73, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x72, 0x79, 0x52,
0x0f, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67, 0x67, 0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x65, 0x73,
0x12, 0x45, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x18, 0x06, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x31,
0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75,
0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x72,
0x79, 0x52, 0x04, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x12, 0x49, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x52, 0x61, 0x66, 0x74, 0x49,
0x6e, 0x64, 0x65, 0x78, 0x18, 0x07, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x2b, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73,
0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e,
0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x6d, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x2e, 0x52, 0x61,
0x66, 0x74, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x64, 0x65, 0x78, 0x52, 0x09, 0x52, 0x61, 0x66, 0x74, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x64,
0x65, 0x78, 0x12, 0x46, 0x0a, 0x08, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x74, 0x79, 0x18, 0x0a,
0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x2a, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c,
0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x6d, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x2e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x74, 0x79,
0x52, 0x08, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x74, 0x79, 0x1a, 0x42, 0x0a, 0x14, 0x54, 0x61,
0x67, 0x67, 0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x65, 0x73, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74,
0x72, 0x79, 0x12, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x79, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52,
0x03, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x79, 0x12, 0x14, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20,
0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x02, 0x38, 0x01, 0x1a, 0x37,
0x0a, 0x09, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x72, 0x79, 0x12, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x6b,
0x65, 0x79, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x03, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x79, 0x12, 0x14, 0x0a,
0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61,
0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x02, 0x38, 0x01, 0x22, 0xf1, 0x08, 0x0a, 0x0b, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65,
0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x12, 0x12, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x4b, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x64, 0x18,
0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x04, 0x4b, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x64, 0x12, 0x0e, 0x0a, 0x02, 0x49,
0x44, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x02, 0x49, 0x44, 0x12, 0x18, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x53,
0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x18, 0x03, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x07, 0x53, 0x65,
0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x12, 0x12, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67, 0x73, 0x18, 0x04, 0x20,
0x03, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x04, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67, 0x73, 0x12, 0x18, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64,
0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x18, 0x05, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x07, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72,
0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x12, 0x6d, 0x0a, 0x0f, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67, 0x67, 0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64,
0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x65, 0x73, 0x18, 0x0f, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x43, 0x2e, 0x68,
0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e,
0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65,
0x2e, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67,
0x67, 0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x65, 0x73, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x72,
0x79, 0x52, 0x0f, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67, 0x67, 0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73,
0x65, 0x73, 0x12, 0x4c, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x18, 0x06, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x0b,
0x32, 0x38, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e,
0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72,
0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65,
0x2e, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x72, 0x79, 0x52, 0x04, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61,
0x12, 0x12, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x50, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x74, 0x18, 0x07, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x05, 0x52, 0x04,
0x50, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x74, 0x12, 0x1e, 0x0a, 0x0a, 0x53, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x74, 0x50, 0x61,
0x74, 0x68, 0x18, 0x11, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0a, 0x53, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x74,
0x50, 0x61, 0x74, 0x68, 0x12, 0x44, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x57, 0x65, 0x69, 0x67, 0x68, 0x74, 0x73, 0x18,
0x08, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x2a, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72,
0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61,
0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x57, 0x65, 0x69, 0x67, 0x68, 0x74,
0x73, 0x52, 0x07, 0x57, 0x65, 0x69, 0x67, 0x68, 0x74, 0x73, 0x12, 0x2c, 0x0a, 0x11, 0x45, 0x6e,
0x61, 0x62, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67, 0x4f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x72, 0x69, 0x64, 0x65, 0x18,
0x09, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x08, 0x52, 0x11, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x62, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x54, 0x61, 0x67,
0x4f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x72, 0x69, 0x64, 0x65, 0x12, 0x4b, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x78,
0x79, 0x18, 0x0b, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x35, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72,
0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e,
0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x78, 0x79, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x66, 0x69, 0x67, 0x52, 0x05,
0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x78, 0x79, 0x12, 0x4b, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74,
0x18, 0x0c, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x31, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e,
0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69,
0x63, 0x65, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x52, 0x07, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65,
0x63, 0x74, 0x12, 0x3e, 0x0a, 0x1a, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x79, 0x52, 0x65, 0x67,
0x69, 0x73, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x73, 0x53, 0x69, 0x64, 0x65, 0x63, 0x61, 0x72,
0x18, 0x0d, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x08, 0x52, 0x1a, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x79, 0x52,
0x65, 0x67, 0x69, 0x73, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x73, 0x53, 0x69, 0x64, 0x65, 0x63,
0x61, 0x72, 0x12, 0x58, 0x0a, 0x0e, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x70, 0x72, 0x69, 0x73, 0x65,
0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x18, 0x10, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x30, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73,
0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e,
0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x6d, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x2e, 0x45, 0x6e,
0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x70, 0x72, 0x69, 0x73, 0x65, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x52, 0x0e, 0x45, 0x6e,
0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x70, 0x72, 0x69, 0x73, 0x65, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x12, 0x1a, 0x0a, 0x08,
0x50, 0x65, 0x65, 0x72, 0x4e, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x18, 0x12, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x08,
0x50, 0x65, 0x65, 0x72, 0x4e, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x12, 0x49, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x52, 0x61, 0x66, 0x74,
0x49, 0x6e, 0x64, 0x65, 0x78, 0x18, 0x0e, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x2b, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61,
0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69,
0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x6d, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x2e, 0x52,
0x61, 0x66, 0x74, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x64, 0x65, 0x78, 0x52, 0x09, 0x52, 0x61, 0x66, 0x74, 0x49, 0x6e,
0x64, 0x65, 0x78, 0x12, 0x46, 0x0a, 0x08, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x74, 0x79, 0x18,
0x13, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x2a, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72,
0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61,
0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x6d, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x2e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x74,
0x79, 0x52, 0x08, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x74, 0x79, 0x1a, 0x75, 0x0a, 0x14, 0x54,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
0x61, 0x67, 0x67, 0x65, 0x64, 0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x65, 0x73, 0x45, 0x6e,
0x74, 0x72, 0x79, 0x12, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x79, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09,
0x52, 0x03, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x79, 0x12, 0x47, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x18, 0x02,
0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x31, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70,
0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c,
0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65,
0x41, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x52, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x02,
0x38, 0x01, 0x1a, 0x37, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x72, 0x79, 0x12,
0x10, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x79, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x03, 0x6b, 0x65,
0x79, 0x12, 0x14, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09,
0x52, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x02, 0x38, 0x01, 0x42, 0x8f, 0x02, 0x0a, 0x25,
0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65,
0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x42, 0x09, 0x4e, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x65, 0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f,
0x50, 0x01, 0x5a, 0x33, 0x67, 0x69, 0x74, 0x68, 0x75, 0x62, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2f, 0x68,
0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2f, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2f,
0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x69, 0x76, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x62,
0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0xa2, 0x02, 0x04, 0x48, 0x43, 0x49, 0x53, 0xaa, 0x02,
0x21, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75,
0x6c, 0x2e, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69,
0x63, 0x65, 0xca, 0x02, 0x21, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x5c, 0x43,
0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x53,
0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0xe2, 0x02, 0x2d, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x72, 0x70, 0x5c, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e,
0x61, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x5c, 0x47, 0x50, 0x42, 0x4d, 0x65,
0x74, 0x61, 0x64, 0x61, 0x74, 0x61, 0xea, 0x02, 0x24, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x72, 0x70, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65,
0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x62, 0x06, 0x70,
0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x33,
}
var (
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescOnce sync.Once
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescData = file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDesc
)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
func file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescGZIP() []byte {
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescOnce.Do(func() {
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescData = protoimpl.X.CompressGZIP(file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescData)
})
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDescData
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes = make([]protoimpl.MessageInfo, 8)
var file_private_pbservice_node_proto_goTypes = []interface{}{
(*IndexedCheckServiceNodes)(nil), // 0: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.IndexedCheckServiceNodes
(*CheckServiceNode)(nil), // 1: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.CheckServiceNode
(*Node)(nil), // 2: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node
(*NodeService)(nil), // 3: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService
nil, // 4: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node.TaggedAddressesEntry
nil, // 5: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node.MetaEntry
nil, // 6: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.TaggedAddressesEntry
nil, // 7: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.MetaEntry
(*HealthCheck)(nil), // 8: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.HealthCheck
(*pbcommon.RaftIndex)(nil), // 9: hashicorp.consul.internal.common.RaftIndex
(*pbcommon.Locality)(nil), // 10: hashicorp.consul.internal.common.Locality
(*Weights)(nil), // 11: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Weights
(*ConnectProxyConfig)(nil), // 12: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.ConnectProxyConfig
(*ServiceConnect)(nil), // 13: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.ServiceConnect
(*pbcommon.EnterpriseMeta)(nil), // 14: hashicorp.consul.internal.common.EnterpriseMeta
(*ServiceAddress)(nil), // 15: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.ServiceAddress
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var file_private_pbservice_node_proto_depIdxs = []int32{
1, // 0: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.IndexedCheckServiceNodes.Nodes:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.CheckServiceNode
2, // 1: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.CheckServiceNode.Node:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node
3, // 2: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.CheckServiceNode.Service:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService
8, // 3: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.CheckServiceNode.Checks:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.HealthCheck
4, // 4: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node.TaggedAddresses:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node.TaggedAddressesEntry
5, // 5: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node.Meta:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node.MetaEntry
9, // 6: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node.RaftIndex:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.common.RaftIndex
10, // 7: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Node.Locality:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.common.Locality
6, // 8: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.TaggedAddresses:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.TaggedAddressesEntry
7, // 9: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.Meta:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.MetaEntry
11, // 10: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.Weights:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.Weights
12, // 11: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.Proxy:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.ConnectProxyConfig
13, // 12: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.Connect:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.ServiceConnect
14, // 13: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.EnterpriseMeta:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.common.EnterpriseMeta
9, // 14: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.RaftIndex:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.common.RaftIndex
10, // 15: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.Locality:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.common.Locality
15, // 16: hashicorp.consul.internal.service.NodeService.TaggedAddressesEntry.value:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.service.ServiceAddress
17, // [17:17] is the sub-list for method output_type
17, // [17:17] is the sub-list for method input_type
17, // [17:17] is the sub-list for extension type_name
17, // [17:17] is the sub-list for extension extendee
0, // [0:17] is the sub-list for field type_name
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
func init() { file_private_pbservice_node_proto_init() }
func file_private_pbservice_node_proto_init() {
if File_private_pbservice_node_proto != nil {
return
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_private_pbservice_healthcheck_proto_init()
file_private_pbservice_service_proto_init()
if !protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[0].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*IndexedCheckServiceNodes); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[1].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*CheckServiceNode); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[2].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*Node); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes[3].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*NodeService); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
}
type x struct{}
out := protoimpl.TypeBuilder{
File: protoimpl.DescBuilder{
GoPackagePath: reflect.TypeOf(x{}).PkgPath(),
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
RawDescriptor: file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDesc,
NumEnums: 0,
NumMessages: 8,
NumExtensions: 0,
NumServices: 0,
},
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
GoTypes: file_private_pbservice_node_proto_goTypes,
DependencyIndexes: file_private_pbservice_node_proto_depIdxs,
MessageInfos: file_private_pbservice_node_proto_msgTypes,
}.Build()
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
File_private_pbservice_node_proto = out.File
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_rawDesc = nil
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_goTypes = nil
file_private_pbservice_node_proto_depIdxs = nil
2022-03-23 16:10:03 +00:00
}