consul/api/acl.go

546 lines
13 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

package api
2017-04-24 21:39:50 +00:00
import (
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
"fmt"
"io/ioutil"
2017-04-24 21:39:50 +00:00
"time"
)
const (
// ACLClientType is the client type token
ACLClientType = "client"
// ACLManagementType is the management type token
ACLManagementType = "management"
)
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
type ACLTokenPolicyLink struct {
ID string
Name string
}
// ACLToken represents an ACL Token
type ACLToken struct {
CreateIndex uint64
ModifyIndex uint64
AccessorID string
SecretID string
Description string
Policies []*ACLTokenPolicyLink
Local bool
CreateTime time.Time `json:",omitempty"`
Hash []byte `json:",omitempty"`
// DEPRECATED (ACL-Legacy-Compat)
// Rules will only be present for legacy tokens returned via the new APIs
Rules string `json:",omitempty"`
}
type ACLTokenListEntry struct {
CreateIndex uint64
ModifyIndex uint64
AccessorID string
Description string
Policies []*ACLTokenPolicyLink
Local bool
CreateTime time.Time
Hash []byte
Legacy bool
}
// ACLEntry is used to represent a legacy ACL token
// The legacy tokens are deprecated.
type ACLEntry struct {
CreateIndex uint64
ModifyIndex uint64
ID string
Name string
Type string
Rules string
}
// ACLReplicationStatus is used to represent the status of ACL replication.
2017-04-25 23:32:09 +00:00
type ACLReplicationStatus struct {
2017-04-24 21:39:50 +00:00
Enabled bool
Running bool
SourceDatacenter string
ReplicatedIndex uint64
LastSuccess time.Time
LastError time.Time
}
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
// ACLPolicy represents an ACL Policy.
type ACLPolicy struct {
ID string
Name string
Description string
Rules string
Datacenters []string
Hash []byte
CreateIndex uint64
ModifyIndex uint64
}
type ACLPolicyListEntry struct {
ID string
Name string
Description string
Datacenters []string
Hash []byte
CreateIndex uint64
ModifyIndex uint64
}
// ACL can be used to query the ACL endpoints
type ACL struct {
c *Client
}
// ACL returns a handle to the ACL endpoints
func (c *Client) ACL() *ACL {
return &ACL{c}
}
// Bootstrap is used to perform a one-time ACL bootstrap operation on a cluster
// to get the first management token.
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
func (a *ACL) Bootstrap() (*ACLToken, *WriteMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/bootstrap")
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
var out ACLToken
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
return nil, nil, err
}
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
return &out, wm, nil
}
// Create is used to generate a new token with the given parameters
func (a *ACL) Create(acl *ACLEntry, q *WriteOptions) (string, *WriteMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/create")
r.setWriteOptions(q)
r.obj = acl
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return "", nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
var out struct{ ID string }
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return "", nil, err
}
return out.ID, wm, nil
}
// Update is used to update the rules of an existing token
func (a *ACL) Update(acl *ACLEntry, q *WriteOptions) (*WriteMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/update")
r.setWriteOptions(q)
r.obj = acl
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
return wm, nil
}
// Destroy is used to destroy a given ACL token ID
func (a *ACL) Destroy(id string, q *WriteOptions) (*WriteMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/destroy/"+id)
r.setWriteOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
return wm, nil
}
// Clone is used to return a new token cloned from an existing one
func (a *ACL) Clone(id string, q *WriteOptions) (string, *WriteMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/clone/"+id)
r.setWriteOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return "", nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
var out struct{ ID string }
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return "", nil, err
}
return out.ID, wm, nil
}
// Info is used to query for information about an ACL token
func (a *ACL) Info(id string, q *QueryOptions) (*ACLEntry, *QueryMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("GET", "/v1/acl/info/"+id)
r.setQueryOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
var entries []*ACLEntry
if err := decodeBody(resp, &entries); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
if len(entries) > 0 {
return entries[0], qm, nil
}
return nil, qm, nil
}
// List is used to get all the ACL tokens
func (a *ACL) List(q *QueryOptions) ([]*ACLEntry, *QueryMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("GET", "/v1/acl/list")
r.setQueryOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
var entries []*ACLEntry
if err := decodeBody(resp, &entries); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return entries, qm, nil
}
2017-04-24 21:39:50 +00:00
// Replication returns the status of the ACL replication process in the datacenter
func (a *ACL) Replication(q *QueryOptions) (*ACLReplicationStatus, *QueryMeta, error) {
2017-04-24 21:39:50 +00:00
r := a.c.newRequest("GET", "/v1/acl/replication")
r.setQueryOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
var entries *ACLReplicationStatus
2017-04-24 21:39:50 +00:00
if err := decodeBody(resp, &entries); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return entries, qm, nil
}
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
func (a *ACL) TokenCreate(token *ACLToken, q *WriteOptions) (*ACLToken, *WriteMeta, error) {
if token.AccessorID != "" {
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("Cannot specify an AccessorID in Token Creation")
}
if token.SecretID != "" {
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("Cannot specify a SecretID in Token Creation")
}
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/token")
r.setWriteOptions(q)
r.obj = token
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
var out ACLToken
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, wm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) TokenUpdate(token *ACLToken, q *WriteOptions) (*ACLToken, *WriteMeta, error) {
if token.AccessorID == "" {
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("Must specify an AccessorID for Token Updating")
}
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/token/"+token.AccessorID)
r.setWriteOptions(q)
r.obj = token
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
var out ACLToken
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, wm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) TokenClone(tokenID string, description string, q *WriteOptions) (*ACLToken, *WriteMeta, error) {
if tokenID == "" {
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("Must specify a tokenID for Token Cloning")
}
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/token/"+tokenID+"/clone")
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
r.setWriteOptions(q)
r.obj = struct{ Description string }{description}
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
var out ACLToken
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, wm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) TokenDelete(tokenID string, q *WriteOptions) (*WriteMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("DELETE", "/v1/acl/token/"+tokenID)
r.setWriteOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
return wm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) TokenRead(tokenID string, q *QueryOptions) (*ACLToken, *QueryMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("GET", "/v1/acl/token/"+tokenID)
r.setQueryOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
var out ACLToken
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, qm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) TokenReadSelf(q *QueryOptions) (*ACLToken, *QueryMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("GET", "/v1/acl/token/self")
r.setQueryOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
var out ACLToken
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, qm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) TokenList(q *QueryOptions) ([]*ACLTokenListEntry, *QueryMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("GET", "/v1/acl/tokens")
r.setQueryOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
var entries []*ACLTokenListEntry
if err := decodeBody(resp, &entries); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return entries, qm, nil
}
// TokenUpgrade performs an almost identical operation as TokenUpdate. The only difference is
// that not all parts of the token must be specified here and the server will patch the token
// with the existing secret id, description etc.
func (a *ACL) TokenUpgrade(token *ACLToken, q *WriteOptions) (*ACLToken, *WriteMeta, error) {
if token.AccessorID == "" {
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("Must specify an AccessorID for Token Updating")
}
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/token/upgrade"+token.AccessorID)
r.setWriteOptions(q)
r.obj = token
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
var out ACLToken
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, wm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) PolicyCreate(policy *ACLPolicy, q *WriteOptions) (*ACLPolicy, *WriteMeta, error) {
if policy.ID != "" {
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("Cannot specify an ID in Policy Creation")
}
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/policy")
r.setWriteOptions(q)
r.obj = policy
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
var out ACLPolicy
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, wm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) PolicyUpdate(policy *ACLPolicy, q *WriteOptions) (*ACLPolicy, *WriteMeta, error) {
if policy.ID == "" {
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("Must specify an ID in Policy Creation")
}
r := a.c.newRequest("PUT", "/v1/acl/policy/"+policy.ID)
r.setWriteOptions(q)
r.obj = policy
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
var out ACLPolicy
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, wm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) PolicyDelete(policyID string, q *WriteOptions) (*WriteMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("DELETE", "/v1/acl/policy/"+policyID)
r.setWriteOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
resp.Body.Close()
wm := &WriteMeta{RequestTime: rtt}
return wm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) PolicyRead(policyID string, q *QueryOptions) (*ACLPolicy, *QueryMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("GET", "/v1/acl/policy/"+policyID)
r.setQueryOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
var out ACLPolicy
if err := decodeBody(resp, &out); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return &out, qm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) PolicyList(q *QueryOptions) ([]*ACLPolicyListEntry, *QueryMeta, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("GET", "/v1/acl/policies")
r.setQueryOptions(q)
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
var entries []*ACLPolicyListEntry
if err := decodeBody(resp, &entries); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
return entries, qm, nil
}
func (a *ACL) PolicyTranslate(rules string) (string, error) {
r := a.c.newRequest("POST", "/v1/acl/policy/translate")
r.obj = rules
rtt, resp, err := requireOK(a.c.doRequest(r))
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
defer resp.Body.Close()
qm := &QueryMeta{}
parseQueryMeta(resp, qm)
qm.RequestTime = rtt
ruleBytes, err := ioutil.ReadAll(resp.Body)
if err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("Failed to read translated rule body: %v", err)
}
return string(ruleBytes), nil
}