consul/ui/packages/consul-ui/app/abilities/service-instance.js

17 lines
679 B
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

ui: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11409) Port of: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11270) Previously, when showing some action buttons for 'per service intentions' we used a global 'can I do something with any intention' permission to decide whether to show a certain button or not. If a user has a token that does not have 'global' intention permissions, but does have intention permissions on one or more specific services (for example via service / service_prefix), this meant that we did not show them certain buttons required to create/edit the intentions for this specific service. This PR adds that extra permissions check so we now check the intentions permissions per service instead of using the 'global' "can I edit intentions" question/request. **Notes:** - If a HTML button is `disabled` this means tippy.js doesn't adopt the popover properly and subsequently hide it from the user, so aswell as just disabling the button so you can't active the popover, we also don't even put the popover on the page - If `ability.item` or `ability.item.Resources` are empty then assume no access **We don't try to disable service > right hand side intention actions here** Whether you can create intentions for a service depends on the _destination_ of the intention you would like to create. For the topology view going from the LHS to the center, this is straightforwards as we only need to know the permissions for the central service, as when you are going from the LHS to the center, the center is the _destination_. When going from the center to the RHS the _destination[s]_ are on the RHS. This means we need to know the permissions for potentially 1000s of services all in one go in order to know when to show a button or not. We can't realistically discover the permissions for service > RHS services as we'd have either make a HTTP request per right hand service, or potentially make an incredibly large POST request for all the potentially 1000s of services on the right hand side (more preferable to 1000s of HTTP requests). Therefore for the moment at least we keep the old functionality (thin client) for the middle to RHS here. If you do go to click on the button and you don't have permissions to update the intention you will still not be able to update it, only you won't know this until you click the button (at which point you'll get a UI visible 403 error) Note: We reversed the conditional here between 1.10 and 1.11 So this make 100% sense that the port is different here to 1.11
2021-11-04 12:10:28 +00:00
import BaseAbility, { ACCESS_READ, ACCESS_WRITE } from './base';
export default class ServiceInstanceAbility extends BaseAbility {
resource = 'service';
ui: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11409) Port of: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11270) Previously, when showing some action buttons for 'per service intentions' we used a global 'can I do something with any intention' permission to decide whether to show a certain button or not. If a user has a token that does not have 'global' intention permissions, but does have intention permissions on one or more specific services (for example via service / service_prefix), this meant that we did not show them certain buttons required to create/edit the intentions for this specific service. This PR adds that extra permissions check so we now check the intentions permissions per service instead of using the 'global' "can I edit intentions" question/request. **Notes:** - If a HTML button is `disabled` this means tippy.js doesn't adopt the popover properly and subsequently hide it from the user, so aswell as just disabling the button so you can't active the popover, we also don't even put the popover on the page - If `ability.item` or `ability.item.Resources` are empty then assume no access **We don't try to disable service > right hand side intention actions here** Whether you can create intentions for a service depends on the _destination_ of the intention you would like to create. For the topology view going from the LHS to the center, this is straightforwards as we only need to know the permissions for the central service, as when you are going from the LHS to the center, the center is the _destination_. When going from the center to the RHS the _destination[s]_ are on the RHS. This means we need to know the permissions for potentially 1000s of services all in one go in order to know when to show a button or not. We can't realistically discover the permissions for service > RHS services as we'd have either make a HTTP request per right hand service, or potentially make an incredibly large POST request for all the potentially 1000s of services on the right hand side (more preferable to 1000s of HTTP requests). Therefore for the moment at least we keep the old functionality (thin client) for the middle to RHS here. If you do go to click on the button and you don't have permissions to update the intention you will still not be able to update it, only you won't know this until you click the button (at which point you'll get a UI visible 403 error) Note: We reversed the conditional here between 1.10 and 1.11 So this make 100% sense that the port is different here to 1.11
2021-11-04 12:10:28 +00:00
generateForSegment(segment) {
// When we ask for service-instances its almost like a request for a single service
// When we do that we also want to know if we can read/write intentions for services
// so here we add intentions read/write for the specific segment/service prefix
ui: chore - upgrade ember and friends (#14518) * v3.20.2...v3.24.0 * Fix handle undefined outlet in route component * Don't use template helper for optional modal.open Using the optional-helper here will trigger a computation in the same runloop error. This is because we are setting the `modal`-property when the `<Ref>` component gets rendered which will update the `this.modal`-property which will then recompute the `optional`-helper leading to this error. Instead we will create an action that will call the `open`-method on the modal when it is defined. This gets rid of the double computation error as we will not access the modal property twice in the same runloop when `modal` is getting set. * Fix - fn needs to be passed function tab-nav We create functions in the component file instead so that fn-helper stops complaining about the need to pass a function. * Update ember-exam to 6.1 version "Makes it compatible" with ember-qunit v5 * scheduleOnce setMaxHeight paged-collection We need to schedule to get around double-computation error. * Fix - model.data is removed from ember-data This has been private API all along - we need to work around the removal. Reference: https://github.com/emberjs/data/pull/7338/files#diff-9a8746fc5c86fd57e6122f00fef3155f76f0f3003a24b53fb7c4621d95dcd9bfL1310 * Fix `propContains` instead of `deepEqual` policy Recent model.data works differently than iterating attributes. We use `propContains` instead of `deepEqual`. We are only interested in the properties we assert against and match the previous behavior with this change. * Fix `propContains` instead of `deepEqual` token * Better handling single-records repo test-helper `model.data` has been removed we need to handle proxies and model instances differently. * Fix remaining repository tests with propContains We don't want to match entire objects - we don't care about properties we haven't defined in the assertion. * Don't use template helper for optional modal.open Using a template helper will give us a recomputation error - we work around it by creating an explicit action on the component instead. * Await `I $verb the $pageObject object` step * Fix no more customization ember-can No need to customize, the helper handles destruction fine on its own. * Fix - don't pass `optional` functions to fn We will declare the functions on the component instead. This gives us the same behavior but no error from `fn`, which expects a function to be passed. * Fix - handle `undefined` state on validate modifier StateChart can yield out an undefined `state` we need to handle that in the validate modifier * Fix linting errors tests directory * Warn / turn off new ember linting issues We will tackle them one by one and don't want to autofix issues that could be dangerous to auto-fix. * Auto-fix linting issues * More linting configuration * Fix remaining linting issues * Fix linting issues new files after rebase * ui: Remove ember-cli-uglify config now we are using terser (#14574) Co-authored-by: John Cowen <johncowen@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-09-15 08:43:17 +00:00
return super
.generateForSegment(...arguments)
.concat([
this.permissions.generate('intention', ACCESS_READ, segment),
this.permissions.generate('intention', ACCESS_WRITE, segment),
]);
ui: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11409) Port of: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11270) Previously, when showing some action buttons for 'per service intentions' we used a global 'can I do something with any intention' permission to decide whether to show a certain button or not. If a user has a token that does not have 'global' intention permissions, but does have intention permissions on one or more specific services (for example via service / service_prefix), this meant that we did not show them certain buttons required to create/edit the intentions for this specific service. This PR adds that extra permissions check so we now check the intentions permissions per service instead of using the 'global' "can I edit intentions" question/request. **Notes:** - If a HTML button is `disabled` this means tippy.js doesn't adopt the popover properly and subsequently hide it from the user, so aswell as just disabling the button so you can't active the popover, we also don't even put the popover on the page - If `ability.item` or `ability.item.Resources` are empty then assume no access **We don't try to disable service > right hand side intention actions here** Whether you can create intentions for a service depends on the _destination_ of the intention you would like to create. For the topology view going from the LHS to the center, this is straightforwards as we only need to know the permissions for the central service, as when you are going from the LHS to the center, the center is the _destination_. When going from the center to the RHS the _destination[s]_ are on the RHS. This means we need to know the permissions for potentially 1000s of services all in one go in order to know when to show a button or not. We can't realistically discover the permissions for service > RHS services as we'd have either make a HTTP request per right hand service, or potentially make an incredibly large POST request for all the potentially 1000s of services on the right hand side (more preferable to 1000s of HTTP requests). Therefore for the moment at least we keep the old functionality (thin client) for the middle to RHS here. If you do go to click on the button and you don't have permissions to update the intention you will still not be able to update it, only you won't know this until you click the button (at which point you'll get a UI visible 403 error) Note: We reversed the conditional here between 1.10 and 1.11 So this make 100% sense that the port is different here to 1.11
2021-11-04 12:10:28 +00:00
}
}