consul/agent/connect/ca/mock_Provider.go

270 lines
5.6 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Code generated by mockery v2.15.0. DO NOT EDIT.
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
package ca
import (
x509 "crypto/x509"
mock "github.com/stretchr/testify/mock"
)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
// MockProvider is an autogenerated mock type for the Provider type
type MockProvider struct {
mock.Mock
}
// ActiveIntermediate provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) ActiveIntermediate() (string, error) {
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 string
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// Cleanup provides a mock function with given fields: providerTypeChange, otherConfig
func (_m *MockProvider) Cleanup(providerTypeChange bool, otherConfig map[string]interface{}) error {
ret := _m.Called(providerTypeChange, otherConfig)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
var r0 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(bool, map[string]interface{}) error); ok {
r0 = rf(providerTypeChange, otherConfig)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
} else {
r0 = ret.Error(0)
}
return r0
}
// Configure provides a mock function with given fields: cfg
func (_m *MockProvider) Configure(cfg ProviderConfig) error {
ret := _m.Called(cfg)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
var r0 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(ProviderConfig) error); ok {
r0 = rf(cfg)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
} else {
r0 = ret.Error(0)
}
return r0
}
// CrossSignCA provides a mock function with given fields: _a0
func (_m *MockProvider) CrossSignCA(_a0 *x509.Certificate) (string, error) {
ret := _m.Called(_a0)
var r0 string
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.Certificate) string); ok {
r0 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func(*x509.Certificate) error); ok {
r1 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// GenerateIntermediate provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) GenerateIntermediate() (string, error) {
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 string
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// GenerateIntermediateCSR provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) GenerateIntermediateCSR() (string, string, error) {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 string
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
var r1 string
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() string); ok {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Get(1).(string)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
}
var r2 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(2).(func() error); ok {
r2 = rf()
} else {
r2 = ret.Error(2)
}
return r0, r1, r2
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
}
// GenerateRoot provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) GenerateRoot() (RootResult, error) {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 RootResult
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() RootResult); ok {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
r0 = rf()
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(RootResult)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
}
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
}
// SetIntermediate provides a mock function with given fields: intermediatePEM, rootPEM, opaque
func (_m *MockProvider) SetIntermediate(intermediatePEM string, rootPEM string, opaque string) error {
ret := _m.Called(intermediatePEM, rootPEM, opaque)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
var r0 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(string, string, string) error); ok {
r0 = rf(intermediatePEM, rootPEM, opaque)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
} else {
r0 = ret.Error(0)
}
return r0
}
// Sign provides a mock function with given fields: _a0
func (_m *MockProvider) Sign(_a0 *x509.CertificateRequest) (string, error) {
ret := _m.Called(_a0)
var r0 string
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) string); ok {
r0 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) error); ok {
r1 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// SignIntermediate provides a mock function with given fields: _a0
func (_m *MockProvider) SignIntermediate(_a0 *x509.CertificateRequest) (string, error) {
ret := _m.Called(_a0)
var r0 string
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) string); ok {
r0 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) error); ok {
r1 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// State provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) State() (map[string]string, error) {
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 map[string]string
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() map[string]string); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
if ret.Get(0) != nil {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(map[string]string)
}
}
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// SupportsCrossSigning provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) SupportsCrossSigning() (bool, error) {
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 bool
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() bool); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(bool)
}
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
type mockConstructorTestingTNewMockProvider interface {
mock.TestingT
Cleanup(func())
}
// NewMockProvider creates a new instance of MockProvider. It also registers a testing interface on the mock and a cleanup function to assert the mocks expectations.
func NewMockProvider(t mockConstructorTestingTNewMockProvider) *MockProvider {
mock := &MockProvider{}
mock.Mock.Test(t)
t.Cleanup(func() { mock.AssertExpectations(t) })
return mock
}