consul/agent/proxycfg/manager_test.go

660 lines
20 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
[COMPLIANCE] License changes (#18443) * Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository. * Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository. * Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at <Blog URL>, FAQ at www.hashicorp.com/licensing-faq, and details of the license at www.hashicorp.com/bsl. * add missing license headers * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 --------- Co-authored-by: hashicorp-copywrite[bot] <110428419+hashicorp-copywrite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-08-11 13:12:13 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1
package proxycfg
import (
proxysnapshot "github.com/hashicorp/consul/internal/mesh/proxy-snapshot"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/acl"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/configentry"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/connect"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/consul/discoverychain"
agent: remove agent cache dependency from service mesh leaf certificate management (#17075) * agent: remove agent cache dependency from service mesh leaf certificate management This extracts the leaf cert management from within the agent cache. This code was produced by the following process: 1. All tests in agent/cache, agent/cache-types, agent/auto-config, agent/consul/servercert were run at each stage. - The tests in agent matching .*Leaf were run at each stage. - The tests in agent/leafcert were run at each stage after they existed. 2. The former leaf cert Fetch implementation was extracted into a new package behind a "fake RPC" endpoint to make it look almost like all other cache type internals. 3. The old cache type was shimmed to use the fake RPC endpoint and generally cleaned up. 4. I selectively duplicated all of Get/Notify/NotifyCallback/Prepopulate from the agent/cache.Cache implementation over into the new package. This was renamed as leafcert.Manager. - Code that was irrelevant to the leaf cert type was deleted (inlining blocking=true, refresh=false) 5. Everything that used the leaf cert cache type (including proxycfg stuff) was shifted to use the leafcert.Manager instead. 6. agent/cache-types tests were moved and gently replumbed to execute as-is against a leafcert.Manager. 7. Inspired by some of the locking changes from derek's branch I split the fat lock into N+1 locks. 8. The waiter chan struct{} was eventually replaced with a singleflight.Group around cache updates, which was likely the biggest net structural change. 9. The awkward two layers or logic produced as a byproduct of marrying the agent cache management code with the leaf cert type code was slowly coalesced and flattened to remove confusion. 10. The .*Leaf tests from the agent package were copied and made to work directly against a leafcert.Manager to increase direct coverage. I have done a best effort attempt to port the previous leaf-cert cache type's tests over in spirit, as well as to take the e2e-ish tests in the agent package with Leaf in the test name and copy those into the agent/leafcert package to get more direct coverage, rather than coverage tangled up in the agent logic. There is no net-new test coverage, just coverage that was pushed around from elsewhere.
2023-06-13 15:54:45 +00:00
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/leafcert"
2022-07-13 16:14:57 +00:00
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/proxycfg/internal/watch"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/structs"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/api"
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto/private/pbpeering"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk/testutil"
)
const testSource ProxySource = "test"
func mustCopyProxyConfig(t *testing.T, ns *structs.NodeService) structs.ConnectProxyConfig {
cfg, err := copyProxyConfig(ns)
require.NoError(t, err)
return cfg
}
// assertLastReqArgs verifies that each request type had the correct source
// parameters (e.g. Datacenter name) and token.
func assertLastReqArgs(t *testing.T, dataSources *TestDataSources, token string, source *structs.QuerySource) {
t.Helper()
// Roots needs correct DC and token
rootReq := dataSources.CARoots.LastReq()
require.Equal(t, token, rootReq.Token)
require.Equal(t, source.Datacenter, rootReq.Datacenter)
// Leaf needs correct DC and token
leafReq := dataSources.LeafCertificate.LastReq()
require.Equal(t, token, leafReq.Token)
require.Equal(t, source.Datacenter, leafReq.Datacenter)
// Intentions needs correct DC and token
intReq := dataSources.Intentions.LastReq()
require.Equal(t, token, intReq.Token)
require.Equal(t, source.Datacenter, intReq.Datacenter)
}
func TestManager_BasicLifecycle(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
// Create a bunch of common data for the various test cases.
roots, leaf := TestCerts(t)
dbDefaultChain := func() *structs.CompiledDiscoveryChain {
set := configentry.NewDiscoveryChainSet()
set.AddEntries(&structs.ServiceResolverConfigEntry{
Kind: structs.ServiceResolver,
Name: "db",
})
return discoverychain.TestCompileConfigEntries(t, "db", "default", "default", "dc1", connect.TestClusterID+".consul", func(req *discoverychain.CompileRequest) {
// This is because structs.TestUpstreams uses an opaque config
// to override connect timeouts.
req.OverrideConnectTimeout = 1 * time.Second
}, set)
}
dbSplitChain := func() *structs.CompiledDiscoveryChain {
set := configentry.NewDiscoveryChainSet()
set.AddEntries(&structs.ProxyConfigEntry{
Kind: structs.ProxyDefaults,
Name: structs.ProxyConfigGlobal,
Config: map[string]interface{}{
"protocol": "http",
connect: reconcile how upstream configuration works with discovery chains (#6225) * connect: reconcile how upstream configuration works with discovery chains The following upstream config fields for connect sidecars sanely integrate into discovery chain resolution: - Destination Namespace/Datacenter: Compilation occurs locally but using different default values for namespaces and datacenters. The xDS clusters that are created are named as they normally would be. - Mesh Gateway Mode (single upstream): If set this value overrides any value computed for any resolver for the entire discovery chain. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Mesh Gateway Mode (whole sidecar): If set this value overrides any value computed for any resolver for the entire discovery chain. If this is specifically overridden for a single upstream this value is ignored in that case. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Protocol (in opaque config): If set this value overrides the value computed when evaluating the entire discovery chain. If the normal chain would be TCP or if this override is set to TCP then the result is that we explicitly disable L7 Routing and Splitting. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Connect Timeout (in opaque config): If set this value overrides the value for any resolver in the entire discovery chain. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). If any of the above overrides affect the actual result of compiling the discovery chain (i.e. "tcp" becomes "grpc" instead of being a no-op override to "tcp") then the relevant parameters are hashed and provided to the xDS layer as a prefix for use in naming the Clusters. This is to ensure that if one Upstream discovery chain has no overrides and tangentially needs a cluster named "api.default.XXX", and another Upstream does have overrides for "api.default.XXX" that they won't cross-pollinate against the operator's wishes. Fixes #6159
2019-08-02 03:03:34 +00:00
},
}, &structs.ServiceResolverConfigEntry{
Kind: structs.ServiceResolver,
Name: "db",
Subsets: map[string]structs.ServiceResolverSubset{
"v1": {
Filter: "Service.Meta.version == v1",
},
"v2": {
Filter: "Service.Meta.version == v2",
},
},
}, &structs.ServiceSplitterConfigEntry{
Kind: structs.ServiceSplitter,
Name: "db",
Splits: []structs.ServiceSplit{
{Weight: 60, ServiceSubset: "v1"},
{Weight: 40, ServiceSubset: "v2"},
},
})
return discoverychain.TestCompileConfigEntries(t, "db", "default", "default", "dc1", "trustdomain.consul", func(req *discoverychain.CompileRequest) {
// This is because structs.TestUpstreams uses an opaque config
// to override connect timeouts.
req.OverrideConnectTimeout = 1 * time.Second
}, set)
}
2021-03-17 19:40:39 +00:00
2023-03-22 18:56:18 +00:00
upstreams := structs.TestUpstreams(t, false)
2021-03-17 19:40:39 +00:00
for i := range upstreams {
upstreams[i].DestinationNamespace = structs.IntentionDefaultNamespace
upstreams[i].DestinationPartition = api.PartitionDefaultName
2021-03-17 19:40:39 +00:00
}
webProxy := &structs.NodeService{
Kind: structs.ServiceKindConnectProxy,
ID: "web-sidecar-proxy",
Service: "web-sidecar-proxy",
Port: 9999,
wan federation via mesh gateways (#6884) This is like a Möbius strip of code due to the fact that low-level components (serf/memberlist) are connected to high-level components (the catalog and mesh-gateways) in a twisty maze of references which make it hard to dive into. With that in mind here's a high level summary of what you'll find in the patch: There are several distinct chunks of code that are affected: * new flags and config options for the server * retry join WAN is slightly different * retry join code is shared to discover primary mesh gateways from secondary datacenters * because retry join logic runs in the *agent* and the results of that operation for primary mesh gateways are needed in the *server* there are some methods like `RefreshPrimaryGatewayFallbackAddresses` that must occur at multiple layers of abstraction just to pass the data down to the right layer. * new cache type `FederationStateListMeshGatewaysName` for use in `proxycfg/xds` layers * the function signature for RPC dialing picked up a new required field (the node name of the destination) * several new RPCs for manipulating a FederationState object: `FederationState:{Apply,Get,List,ListMeshGateways}` * 3 read-only internal APIs for debugging use to invoke those RPCs from curl * raft and fsm changes to persist these FederationStates * replication for FederationStates as they are canonically stored in the Primary and replicated to the Secondaries. * a special derivative of anti-entropy that runs in secondaries to snapshot their local mesh gateway `CheckServiceNodes` and sync them into their upstream FederationState in the primary (this works in conjunction with the replication to distribute addresses for all mesh gateways in all DCs to all other DCs) * a "gateway locator" convenience object to make use of this data to choose the addresses of gateways to use for any given RPC or gossip operation to a remote DC. This gets data from the "retry join" logic in the agent and also directly calls into the FSM. * RPC (`:8300`) on the server sniffs the first byte of a new connection to determine if it's actually doing native TLS. If so it checks the ALPN header for protocol determination (just like how the existing system uses the type-byte marker). * 2 new kinds of protocols are exclusively decoded via this native TLS mechanism: one for ferrying "packet" operations (udp-like) from the gossip layer and one for "stream" operations (tcp-like). The packet operations re-use sockets (using length-prefixing) to cut down on TLS re-negotiation overhead. * the server instances specially wrap the `memberlist.NetTransport` when running with gateway federation enabled (in a `wanfed.Transport`). The general gist is that if it tries to dial a node in the SAME datacenter (deduced by looking at the suffix of the node name) there is no change. If dialing a DIFFERENT datacenter it is wrapped up in a TLS+ALPN blob and sent through some mesh gateways to eventually end up in a server's :8300 port. * a new flag when launching a mesh gateway via `consul connect envoy` to indicate that the servers are to be exposed. This sets a special service meta when registering the gateway into the catalog. * `proxycfg/xds` notice this metadata blob to activate additional watches for the FederationState objects as well as the location of all of the consul servers in that datacenter. * `xds:` if the extra metadata is in place additional clusters are defined in a DC to bulk sink all traffic to another DC's gateways. For the current datacenter we listen on a wildcard name (`server.<dc>.consul`) that load balances all servers as well as one mini-cluster per node (`<node>.server.<dc>.consul`) * the `consul tls cert create` command got a new flag (`-node`) to help create an additional SAN in certs that can be used with this flavor of federation.
2020-03-09 20:59:02 +00:00
Meta: map[string]string{},
Proxy: structs.ConnectProxyConfig{
DestinationServiceID: "web",
DestinationServiceName: "web",
LocalServiceAddress: "127.0.0.1",
LocalServicePort: 8080,
Config: map[string]interface{}{
"foo": "bar",
},
2021-03-17 19:40:39 +00:00
Upstreams: upstreams,
},
}
rootsReq := &structs.DCSpecificRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: "my-token"},
}
agent: remove agent cache dependency from service mesh leaf certificate management (#17075) * agent: remove agent cache dependency from service mesh leaf certificate management This extracts the leaf cert management from within the agent cache. This code was produced by the following process: 1. All tests in agent/cache, agent/cache-types, agent/auto-config, agent/consul/servercert were run at each stage. - The tests in agent matching .*Leaf were run at each stage. - The tests in agent/leafcert were run at each stage after they existed. 2. The former leaf cert Fetch implementation was extracted into a new package behind a "fake RPC" endpoint to make it look almost like all other cache type internals. 3. The old cache type was shimmed to use the fake RPC endpoint and generally cleaned up. 4. I selectively duplicated all of Get/Notify/NotifyCallback/Prepopulate from the agent/cache.Cache implementation over into the new package. This was renamed as leafcert.Manager. - Code that was irrelevant to the leaf cert type was deleted (inlining blocking=true, refresh=false) 5. Everything that used the leaf cert cache type (including proxycfg stuff) was shifted to use the leafcert.Manager instead. 6. agent/cache-types tests were moved and gently replumbed to execute as-is against a leafcert.Manager. 7. Inspired by some of the locking changes from derek's branch I split the fat lock into N+1 locks. 8. The waiter chan struct{} was eventually replaced with a singleflight.Group around cache updates, which was likely the biggest net structural change. 9. The awkward two layers or logic produced as a byproduct of marrying the agent cache management code with the leaf cert type code was slowly coalesced and flattened to remove confusion. 10. The .*Leaf tests from the agent package were copied and made to work directly against a leafcert.Manager to increase direct coverage. I have done a best effort attempt to port the previous leaf-cert cache type's tests over in spirit, as well as to take the e2e-ish tests in the agent package with Leaf in the test name and copy those into the agent/leafcert package to get more direct coverage, rather than coverage tangled up in the agent logic. There is no net-new test coverage, just coverage that was pushed around from elsewhere.
2023-06-13 15:54:45 +00:00
leafReq := &leafcert.ConnectCALeafRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Token: "my-token",
Service: "web",
}
intentionReq := &structs.ServiceSpecificRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: "my-token"},
EnterpriseMeta: *acl.DefaultEnterpriseMeta(),
ServiceName: "web",
}
meshConfigReq := &structs.ConfigEntryQuery{
Datacenter: "dc1",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: "my-token"},
Kind: structs.MeshConfig,
Name: structs.MeshConfigMesh,
EnterpriseMeta: *structs.DefaultEnterpriseMetaInDefaultPartition(),
}
dbChainReq := &structs.DiscoveryChainRequest{
connect: reconcile how upstream configuration works with discovery chains (#6225) * connect: reconcile how upstream configuration works with discovery chains The following upstream config fields for connect sidecars sanely integrate into discovery chain resolution: - Destination Namespace/Datacenter: Compilation occurs locally but using different default values for namespaces and datacenters. The xDS clusters that are created are named as they normally would be. - Mesh Gateway Mode (single upstream): If set this value overrides any value computed for any resolver for the entire discovery chain. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Mesh Gateway Mode (whole sidecar): If set this value overrides any value computed for any resolver for the entire discovery chain. If this is specifically overridden for a single upstream this value is ignored in that case. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Protocol (in opaque config): If set this value overrides the value computed when evaluating the entire discovery chain. If the normal chain would be TCP or if this override is set to TCP then the result is that we explicitly disable L7 Routing and Splitting. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Connect Timeout (in opaque config): If set this value overrides the value for any resolver in the entire discovery chain. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). If any of the above overrides affect the actual result of compiling the discovery chain (i.e. "tcp" becomes "grpc" instead of being a no-op override to "tcp") then the relevant parameters are hashed and provided to the xDS layer as a prefix for use in naming the Clusters. This is to ensure that if one Upstream discovery chain has no overrides and tangentially needs a cluster named "api.default.XXX", and another Upstream does have overrides for "api.default.XXX" that they won't cross-pollinate against the operator's wishes. Fixes #6159
2019-08-02 03:03:34 +00:00
Name: "db",
EvaluateInDatacenter: "dc1",
EvaluateInNamespace: "default",
EvaluateInPartition: "default",
connect: reconcile how upstream configuration works with discovery chains (#6225) * connect: reconcile how upstream configuration works with discovery chains The following upstream config fields for connect sidecars sanely integrate into discovery chain resolution: - Destination Namespace/Datacenter: Compilation occurs locally but using different default values for namespaces and datacenters. The xDS clusters that are created are named as they normally would be. - Mesh Gateway Mode (single upstream): If set this value overrides any value computed for any resolver for the entire discovery chain. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Mesh Gateway Mode (whole sidecar): If set this value overrides any value computed for any resolver for the entire discovery chain. If this is specifically overridden for a single upstream this value is ignored in that case. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Protocol (in opaque config): If set this value overrides the value computed when evaluating the entire discovery chain. If the normal chain would be TCP or if this override is set to TCP then the result is that we explicitly disable L7 Routing and Splitting. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). - Connect Timeout (in opaque config): If set this value overrides the value for any resolver in the entire discovery chain. The xDS clusters that are created may be named differently (see below). If any of the above overrides affect the actual result of compiling the discovery chain (i.e. "tcp" becomes "grpc" instead of being a no-op override to "tcp") then the relevant parameters are hashed and provided to the xDS layer as a prefix for use in naming the Clusters. This is to ensure that if one Upstream discovery chain has no overrides and tangentially needs a cluster named "api.default.XXX", and another Upstream does have overrides for "api.default.XXX" that they won't cross-pollinate against the operator's wishes. Fixes #6159
2019-08-02 03:03:34 +00:00
// This is because structs.TestUpstreams uses an opaque config
// to override connect timeouts.
OverrideConnectTimeout: 1 * time.Second,
Datacenter: "dc1",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: "my-token"},
}
dbHealthReq := &structs.ServiceSpecificRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: "my-token", Filter: ""},
ServiceName: "db",
Connect: true,
EnterpriseMeta: *structs.DefaultEnterpriseMetaInDefaultPartition(),
}
db_v1_HealthReq := &structs.ServiceSpecificRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: "my-token",
Filter: "Service.Meta.version == v1",
},
ServiceName: "db",
Connect: true,
EnterpriseMeta: *structs.DefaultEnterpriseMetaInDefaultPartition(),
}
db_v2_HealthReq := &structs.ServiceSpecificRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: "my-token",
Filter: "Service.Meta.version == v2",
},
ServiceName: "db",
Connect: true,
EnterpriseMeta: *structs.DefaultEnterpriseMetaInDefaultPartition(),
}
db := structs.NewServiceName("db", nil)
dbUID := NewUpstreamIDFromServiceName(db)
// Create test cases using some of the common data above.
tests := []*testcase_BasicLifecycle{
{
name: "simple-default-resolver",
setup: func(t *testing.T, dataSources *TestDataSources) {
// Note that we deliberately leave the 'geo-cache' prepared query to time out
dataSources.Health.Set(dbHealthReq, &structs.IndexedCheckServiceNodes{
Nodes: TestUpstreamNodes(t, db.Name),
})
dataSources.CompiledDiscoveryChain.Set(dbChainReq, &structs.DiscoveryChainResponse{
Chain: dbDefaultChain(),
})
},
expectSnap: &ConfigSnapshot{
Kind: structs.ServiceKindConnectProxy,
Service: webProxy.Service,
ProxyID: ProxyID{ServiceID: webProxy.CompoundServiceID()},
Address: webProxy.Address,
Port: webProxy.Port,
Proxy: mustCopyProxyConfig(t, webProxy),
wan federation via mesh gateways (#6884) This is like a Möbius strip of code due to the fact that low-level components (serf/memberlist) are connected to high-level components (the catalog and mesh-gateways) in a twisty maze of references which make it hard to dive into. With that in mind here's a high level summary of what you'll find in the patch: There are several distinct chunks of code that are affected: * new flags and config options for the server * retry join WAN is slightly different * retry join code is shared to discover primary mesh gateways from secondary datacenters * because retry join logic runs in the *agent* and the results of that operation for primary mesh gateways are needed in the *server* there are some methods like `RefreshPrimaryGatewayFallbackAddresses` that must occur at multiple layers of abstraction just to pass the data down to the right layer. * new cache type `FederationStateListMeshGatewaysName` for use in `proxycfg/xds` layers * the function signature for RPC dialing picked up a new required field (the node name of the destination) * several new RPCs for manipulating a FederationState object: `FederationState:{Apply,Get,List,ListMeshGateways}` * 3 read-only internal APIs for debugging use to invoke those RPCs from curl * raft and fsm changes to persist these FederationStates * replication for FederationStates as they are canonically stored in the Primary and replicated to the Secondaries. * a special derivative of anti-entropy that runs in secondaries to snapshot their local mesh gateway `CheckServiceNodes` and sync them into their upstream FederationState in the primary (this works in conjunction with the replication to distribute addresses for all mesh gateways in all DCs to all other DCs) * a "gateway locator" convenience object to make use of this data to choose the addresses of gateways to use for any given RPC or gossip operation to a remote DC. This gets data from the "retry join" logic in the agent and also directly calls into the FSM. * RPC (`:8300`) on the server sniffs the first byte of a new connection to determine if it's actually doing native TLS. If so it checks the ALPN header for protocol determination (just like how the existing system uses the type-byte marker). * 2 new kinds of protocols are exclusively decoded via this native TLS mechanism: one for ferrying "packet" operations (udp-like) from the gossip layer and one for "stream" operations (tcp-like). The packet operations re-use sockets (using length-prefixing) to cut down on TLS re-negotiation overhead. * the server instances specially wrap the `memberlist.NetTransport` when running with gateway federation enabled (in a `wanfed.Transport`). The general gist is that if it tries to dial a node in the SAME datacenter (deduced by looking at the suffix of the node name) there is no change. If dialing a DIFFERENT datacenter it is wrapped up in a TLS+ALPN blob and sent through some mesh gateways to eventually end up in a server's :8300 port. * a new flag when launching a mesh gateway via `consul connect envoy` to indicate that the servers are to be exposed. This sets a special service meta when registering the gateway into the catalog. * `proxycfg/xds` notice this metadata blob to activate additional watches for the FederationState objects as well as the location of all of the consul servers in that datacenter. * `xds:` if the extra metadata is in place additional clusters are defined in a DC to bulk sink all traffic to another DC's gateways. For the current datacenter we listen on a wildcard name (`server.<dc>.consul`) that load balances all servers as well as one mini-cluster per node (`<node>.server.<dc>.consul`) * the `consul tls cert create` command got a new flag (`-node`) to help create an additional SAN in certs that can be used with this flavor of federation.
2020-03-09 20:59:02 +00:00
ServiceMeta: webProxy.Meta,
TaggedAddresses: make(map[string]structs.ServiceAddress),
Roots: roots,
ConnectProxy: configSnapshotConnectProxy{
ConfigSnapshotUpstreams: ConfigSnapshotUpstreams{
Leaf: leaf,
MeshConfigSet: true,
DiscoveryChain: map[UpstreamID]*structs.CompiledDiscoveryChain{
dbUID: dbDefaultChain(),
},
WatchedUpstreamEndpoints: map[UpstreamID]map[string]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
dbUID: {
"db.default.default.dc1": TestUpstreamNodes(t, db.Name),
},
},
WatchedGateways: nil, // Clone() clears this out
WatchedGatewayEndpoints: map[UpstreamID]map[string]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
dbUID: {},
},
WatchedLocalGWEndpoints: watch.NewMap[string, structs.CheckServiceNodes](),
UpstreamConfig: map[UpstreamID]*structs.Upstream{
NewUpstreamID(&upstreams[0]): &upstreams[0],
NewUpstreamID(&upstreams[1]): &upstreams[1],
NewUpstreamID(&upstreams[2]): &upstreams[2],
2021-03-17 19:40:39 +00:00
},
PassthroughUpstreams: map[UpstreamID]map[string]map[string]struct{}{},
PassthroughIndices: map[string]indexedTarget{},
2022-07-13 16:14:57 +00:00
UpstreamPeerTrustBundles: watch.NewMap[PeerName, *pbpeering.PeeringTrustBundle](),
PeerUpstreamEndpoints: watch.NewMap[UpstreamID, structs.CheckServiceNodes](),
PeerUpstreamEndpointsUseHostnames: map[UpstreamID]struct{}{},
connect: fix failover through a mesh gateway to a remote datacenter (#6259) Failover is pushed entirely down to the data plane by creating envoy clusters and putting each successive destination in a different load assignment priority band. For example this shows that normally requests go to 1.2.3.4:8080 but when that fails they go to 6.7.8.9:8080: - name: foo load_assignment: cluster_name: foo policy: overprovisioning_factor: 100000 endpoints: - priority: 0 lb_endpoints: - endpoint: address: socket_address: address: 1.2.3.4 port_value: 8080 - priority: 1 lb_endpoints: - endpoint: address: socket_address: address: 6.7.8.9 port_value: 8080 Mesh gateways route requests based solely on the SNI header tacked onto the TLS layer. Envoy currently only lets you configure the outbound SNI header at the cluster layer. If you try to failover through a mesh gateway you ideally would configure the SNI value per endpoint, but that's not possible in envoy today. This PR introduces a simpler way around the problem for now: 1. We identify any target of failover that will use mesh gateway mode local or remote and then further isolate any resolver node in the compiled discovery chain that has a failover destination set to one of those targets. 2. For each of these resolvers we will perform a small measurement of comparative healths of the endpoints that come back from the health API for the set of primary target and serial failover targets. We walk the list of targets in order and if any endpoint is healthy we return that target, otherwise we move on to the next target. 3. The CDS and EDS endpoints both perform the measurements in (2) for the affected resolver nodes. 4. For CDS this measurement selects which TLS SNI field to use for the cluster (note the cluster is always going to be named for the primary target) 5. For EDS this measurement selects which set of endpoints will populate the cluster. Priority tiered failover is ignored. One of the big downsides to this approach to failover is that the failover detection and correction is going to be controlled by consul rather than deferring that entirely to the data plane as with the prior version. This also means that we are bound to only failover using official health signals and cannot make use of data plane signals like outlier detection to affect failover. In this specific scenario the lack of data plane signals is ok because the effectiveness is already muted by the fact that the ultimate destination endpoints will have their data plane signals scrambled when they pass through the mesh gateway wrapper anyway so we're not losing much. Another related fix is that we now use the endpoint health from the underlying service, not the health of the gateway (regardless of failover mode).
2019-08-05 18:30:35 +00:00
},
PreparedQueryEndpoints: map[UpstreamID]structs.CheckServiceNodes{},
DestinationsUpstream: watch.NewMap[UpstreamID, *structs.ServiceConfigEntry](),
DestinationGateways: watch.NewMap[UpstreamID, structs.CheckServiceNodes](),
WatchedServiceChecks: map[structs.ServiceID][]structs.CheckType{},
Intentions: TestIntentions(),
IntentionsSet: true,
},
Datacenter: "dc1",
Locality: GatewayKey{Datacenter: "dc1", Partition: acl.PartitionOrDefault("")},
},
},
{
name: "chain-resolver-with-version-split",
setup: func(t *testing.T, dataSources *TestDataSources) {
// Note that we deliberately leave the 'geo-cache' prepared query to time out
dataSources.Health.Set(db_v1_HealthReq, &structs.IndexedCheckServiceNodes{
Nodes: TestUpstreamNodes(t, db.Name),
})
dataSources.Health.Set(db_v2_HealthReq, &structs.IndexedCheckServiceNodes{
Nodes: TestUpstreamNodesAlternate(t),
})
dataSources.CompiledDiscoveryChain.Set(dbChainReq, &structs.DiscoveryChainResponse{
Chain: dbSplitChain(),
})
},
expectSnap: &ConfigSnapshot{
Kind: structs.ServiceKindConnectProxy,
Service: webProxy.Service,
ProxyID: ProxyID{ServiceID: webProxy.CompoundServiceID()},
Address: webProxy.Address,
Port: webProxy.Port,
Proxy: mustCopyProxyConfig(t, webProxy),
wan federation via mesh gateways (#6884) This is like a Möbius strip of code due to the fact that low-level components (serf/memberlist) are connected to high-level components (the catalog and mesh-gateways) in a twisty maze of references which make it hard to dive into. With that in mind here's a high level summary of what you'll find in the patch: There are several distinct chunks of code that are affected: * new flags and config options for the server * retry join WAN is slightly different * retry join code is shared to discover primary mesh gateways from secondary datacenters * because retry join logic runs in the *agent* and the results of that operation for primary mesh gateways are needed in the *server* there are some methods like `RefreshPrimaryGatewayFallbackAddresses` that must occur at multiple layers of abstraction just to pass the data down to the right layer. * new cache type `FederationStateListMeshGatewaysName` for use in `proxycfg/xds` layers * the function signature for RPC dialing picked up a new required field (the node name of the destination) * several new RPCs for manipulating a FederationState object: `FederationState:{Apply,Get,List,ListMeshGateways}` * 3 read-only internal APIs for debugging use to invoke those RPCs from curl * raft and fsm changes to persist these FederationStates * replication for FederationStates as they are canonically stored in the Primary and replicated to the Secondaries. * a special derivative of anti-entropy that runs in secondaries to snapshot their local mesh gateway `CheckServiceNodes` and sync them into their upstream FederationState in the primary (this works in conjunction with the replication to distribute addresses for all mesh gateways in all DCs to all other DCs) * a "gateway locator" convenience object to make use of this data to choose the addresses of gateways to use for any given RPC or gossip operation to a remote DC. This gets data from the "retry join" logic in the agent and also directly calls into the FSM. * RPC (`:8300`) on the server sniffs the first byte of a new connection to determine if it's actually doing native TLS. If so it checks the ALPN header for protocol determination (just like how the existing system uses the type-byte marker). * 2 new kinds of protocols are exclusively decoded via this native TLS mechanism: one for ferrying "packet" operations (udp-like) from the gossip layer and one for "stream" operations (tcp-like). The packet operations re-use sockets (using length-prefixing) to cut down on TLS re-negotiation overhead. * the server instances specially wrap the `memberlist.NetTransport` when running with gateway federation enabled (in a `wanfed.Transport`). The general gist is that if it tries to dial a node in the SAME datacenter (deduced by looking at the suffix of the node name) there is no change. If dialing a DIFFERENT datacenter it is wrapped up in a TLS+ALPN blob and sent through some mesh gateways to eventually end up in a server's :8300 port. * a new flag when launching a mesh gateway via `consul connect envoy` to indicate that the servers are to be exposed. This sets a special service meta when registering the gateway into the catalog. * `proxycfg/xds` notice this metadata blob to activate additional watches for the FederationState objects as well as the location of all of the consul servers in that datacenter. * `xds:` if the extra metadata is in place additional clusters are defined in a DC to bulk sink all traffic to another DC's gateways. For the current datacenter we listen on a wildcard name (`server.<dc>.consul`) that load balances all servers as well as one mini-cluster per node (`<node>.server.<dc>.consul`) * the `consul tls cert create` command got a new flag (`-node`) to help create an additional SAN in certs that can be used with this flavor of federation.
2020-03-09 20:59:02 +00:00
ServiceMeta: webProxy.Meta,
TaggedAddresses: make(map[string]structs.ServiceAddress),
Roots: roots,
ConnectProxy: configSnapshotConnectProxy{
ConfigSnapshotUpstreams: ConfigSnapshotUpstreams{
Leaf: leaf,
MeshConfigSet: true,
DiscoveryChain: map[UpstreamID]*structs.CompiledDiscoveryChain{
dbUID: dbSplitChain(),
},
WatchedUpstreamEndpoints: map[UpstreamID]map[string]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
dbUID: {
"v1.db.default.default.dc1": TestUpstreamNodes(t, db.Name),
"v2.db.default.default.dc1": TestUpstreamNodesAlternate(t),
},
},
WatchedGateways: nil, // Clone() clears this out
WatchedGatewayEndpoints: map[UpstreamID]map[string]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
dbUID: {},
},
WatchedLocalGWEndpoints: watch.NewMap[string, structs.CheckServiceNodes](),
UpstreamConfig: map[UpstreamID]*structs.Upstream{
NewUpstreamID(&upstreams[0]): &upstreams[0],
NewUpstreamID(&upstreams[1]): &upstreams[1],
NewUpstreamID(&upstreams[2]): &upstreams[2],
2021-03-17 19:40:39 +00:00
},
PassthroughUpstreams: map[UpstreamID]map[string]map[string]struct{}{},
PassthroughIndices: map[string]indexedTarget{},
2022-07-13 16:14:57 +00:00
UpstreamPeerTrustBundles: watch.NewMap[PeerName, *pbpeering.PeeringTrustBundle](),
PeerUpstreamEndpoints: watch.NewMap[UpstreamID, structs.CheckServiceNodes](),
PeerUpstreamEndpointsUseHostnames: map[UpstreamID]struct{}{},
connect: fix failover through a mesh gateway to a remote datacenter (#6259) Failover is pushed entirely down to the data plane by creating envoy clusters and putting each successive destination in a different load assignment priority band. For example this shows that normally requests go to 1.2.3.4:8080 but when that fails they go to 6.7.8.9:8080: - name: foo load_assignment: cluster_name: foo policy: overprovisioning_factor: 100000 endpoints: - priority: 0 lb_endpoints: - endpoint: address: socket_address: address: 1.2.3.4 port_value: 8080 - priority: 1 lb_endpoints: - endpoint: address: socket_address: address: 6.7.8.9 port_value: 8080 Mesh gateways route requests based solely on the SNI header tacked onto the TLS layer. Envoy currently only lets you configure the outbound SNI header at the cluster layer. If you try to failover through a mesh gateway you ideally would configure the SNI value per endpoint, but that's not possible in envoy today. This PR introduces a simpler way around the problem for now: 1. We identify any target of failover that will use mesh gateway mode local or remote and then further isolate any resolver node in the compiled discovery chain that has a failover destination set to one of those targets. 2. For each of these resolvers we will perform a small measurement of comparative healths of the endpoints that come back from the health API for the set of primary target and serial failover targets. We walk the list of targets in order and if any endpoint is healthy we return that target, otherwise we move on to the next target. 3. The CDS and EDS endpoints both perform the measurements in (2) for the affected resolver nodes. 4. For CDS this measurement selects which TLS SNI field to use for the cluster (note the cluster is always going to be named for the primary target) 5. For EDS this measurement selects which set of endpoints will populate the cluster. Priority tiered failover is ignored. One of the big downsides to this approach to failover is that the failover detection and correction is going to be controlled by consul rather than deferring that entirely to the data plane as with the prior version. This also means that we are bound to only failover using official health signals and cannot make use of data plane signals like outlier detection to affect failover. In this specific scenario the lack of data plane signals is ok because the effectiveness is already muted by the fact that the ultimate destination endpoints will have their data plane signals scrambled when they pass through the mesh gateway wrapper anyway so we're not losing much. Another related fix is that we now use the endpoint health from the underlying service, not the health of the gateway (regardless of failover mode).
2019-08-05 18:30:35 +00:00
},
PreparedQueryEndpoints: map[UpstreamID]structs.CheckServiceNodes{},
DestinationsUpstream: watch.NewMap[UpstreamID, *structs.ServiceConfigEntry](),
DestinationGateways: watch.NewMap[UpstreamID, structs.CheckServiceNodes](),
WatchedServiceChecks: map[structs.ServiceID][]structs.CheckType{},
Intentions: TestIntentions(),
IntentionsSet: true,
},
Datacenter: "dc1",
Locality: GatewayKey{Datacenter: "dc1", Partition: acl.PartitionOrDefault("")},
},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
require.NotNil(t, tt.setup)
require.NotNil(t, tt.expectSnap)
// Setup initial values
dataSources := NewTestDataSources()
dataSources.LeafCertificate.Set(leafReq, leaf)
dataSources.CARoots.Set(rootsReq, roots)
dataSources.Intentions.Set(intentionReq, TestIntentions())
dataSources.ConfigEntry.Set(meshConfigReq, &structs.ConfigEntryResponse{Entry: nil})
tt.setup(t, dataSources)
expectSnapCopy := tt.expectSnap.Clone()
webProxyCopy := webProxy.DeepCopy()
testManager_BasicLifecycle(t,
dataSources,
rootsReq, leafReq,
2020-06-23 17:18:22 +00:00
roots,
webProxyCopy,
expectSnapCopy,
)
})
}
}
type testcase_BasicLifecycle struct {
name string
setup func(t *testing.T, dataSources *TestDataSources)
webProxy *structs.NodeService
expectSnap *ConfigSnapshot
}
func testManager_BasicLifecycle(
t *testing.T,
dataSources *TestDataSources,
rootsReq *structs.DCSpecificRequest,
agent: remove agent cache dependency from service mesh leaf certificate management (#17075) * agent: remove agent cache dependency from service mesh leaf certificate management This extracts the leaf cert management from within the agent cache. This code was produced by the following process: 1. All tests in agent/cache, agent/cache-types, agent/auto-config, agent/consul/servercert were run at each stage. - The tests in agent matching .*Leaf were run at each stage. - The tests in agent/leafcert were run at each stage after they existed. 2. The former leaf cert Fetch implementation was extracted into a new package behind a "fake RPC" endpoint to make it look almost like all other cache type internals. 3. The old cache type was shimmed to use the fake RPC endpoint and generally cleaned up. 4. I selectively duplicated all of Get/Notify/NotifyCallback/Prepopulate from the agent/cache.Cache implementation over into the new package. This was renamed as leafcert.Manager. - Code that was irrelevant to the leaf cert type was deleted (inlining blocking=true, refresh=false) 5. Everything that used the leaf cert cache type (including proxycfg stuff) was shifted to use the leafcert.Manager instead. 6. agent/cache-types tests were moved and gently replumbed to execute as-is against a leafcert.Manager. 7. Inspired by some of the locking changes from derek's branch I split the fat lock into N+1 locks. 8. The waiter chan struct{} was eventually replaced with a singleflight.Group around cache updates, which was likely the biggest net structural change. 9. The awkward two layers or logic produced as a byproduct of marrying the agent cache management code with the leaf cert type code was slowly coalesced and flattened to remove confusion. 10. The .*Leaf tests from the agent package were copied and made to work directly against a leafcert.Manager to increase direct coverage. I have done a best effort attempt to port the previous leaf-cert cache type's tests over in spirit, as well as to take the e2e-ish tests in the agent package with Leaf in the test name and copy those into the agent/leafcert package to get more direct coverage, rather than coverage tangled up in the agent logic. There is no net-new test coverage, just coverage that was pushed around from elsewhere.
2023-06-13 15:54:45 +00:00
leafReq *leafcert.ConnectCALeafRequest,
roots *structs.IndexedCARoots,
webProxy *structs.NodeService,
expectSnap *ConfigSnapshot,
) {
logger := testutil.Logger(t)
source := &structs.QuerySource{Datacenter: "dc1"}
// Create manager
m, err := NewManager(ManagerConfig{
Source: source,
Logger: logger,
DataSources: dataSources.ToDataSources(),
})
require.NoError(t, err)
webProxyID := ProxyID{
ServiceID: webProxy.CompoundServiceID(),
}
// BEFORE we register, we should be able to get a watch channel
wCh, cancel := m.Watch(webProxyID)
defer cancel()
// And it should block with nothing sent on it yet
assertWatchChanBlocks(t, wCh)
require.NoError(t, m.Register(webProxyID, webProxy, testSource, "my-token", false))
// We should see the initial config delivered but not until after the
// coalesce timeout
start := time.Now()
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh, expectSnap)
require.True(t, time.Since(start) >= coalesceTimeout)
assertLastReqArgs(t, dataSources, "my-token", source)
// Update NodeConfig
webProxy.Port = 7777
require.NoError(t, m.Register(webProxyID, webProxy, testSource, "my-token", false))
expectSnap.Port = 7777
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh, expectSnap)
// Register a second watcher
wCh2, cancel2 := m.Watch(webProxyID)
defer cancel2()
// New watcher should immediately receive the current state
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh2, expectSnap)
// Change token
require.NoError(t, m.Register(webProxyID, webProxy, testSource, "other-token", false))
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh, expectSnap)
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh2, expectSnap)
// This is actually sort of timing dependent - the cache background fetcher
// will still be fetching with the old token, but we rely on the fact that our
// mock type will have been blocked on those for a while.
assertLastReqArgs(t, dataSources, "other-token", source)
// Update roots
newRoots, newLeaf := TestCerts(t)
newRoots.Roots = append(newRoots.Roots, roots.Roots...)
dataSources.CARoots.Set(rootsReq, newRoots)
// Expect new roots in snapshot
expectSnap.Roots = newRoots
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh, expectSnap)
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh2, expectSnap)
// Update leaf
dataSources.LeafCertificate.Set(leafReq, newLeaf)
// Expect new roots in snapshot
expectSnap.ConnectProxy.Leaf = newLeaf
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh, expectSnap)
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh2, expectSnap)
// Remove the proxy
m.Deregister(webProxyID, testSource)
// Chan should NOT close
assertWatchChanBlocks(t, wCh)
assertWatchChanBlocks(t, wCh2)
// Re-add the proxy with another new port
webProxy.Port = 3333
require.NoError(t, m.Register(webProxyID, webProxy, testSource, "other-token", false))
// Same watch chan should be notified again
expectSnap.Port = 3333
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh, expectSnap)
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh2, expectSnap)
// Cancel watch
cancel()
// Watch chan should be closed
assertWatchChanRecvs(t, wCh, nil)
// We specifically don't remove the proxy or cancel the second watcher to
// ensure both are cleaned up by close.
require.NoError(t, m.Close())
// Sanity check the state is clean
m.mu.Lock()
defer m.mu.Unlock()
require.Len(t, m.proxies, 0)
require.Len(t, m.watchers, 0)
}
func assertWatchChanBlocks(t *testing.T, ch <-chan proxysnapshot.ProxySnapshot) {
t.Helper()
select {
case <-ch:
t.Fatal("Should be nothing sent on watch chan yet")
default:
}
}
func assertWatchChanRecvs(t *testing.T, ch <-chan proxysnapshot.ProxySnapshot, expect proxysnapshot.ProxySnapshot) {
t.Helper()
select {
case got, ok := <-ch:
require.Equal(t, expect, got)
if expect == nil {
require.False(t, ok, "watch chan should be closed")
}
case <-time.After(100*time.Millisecond + coalesceTimeout):
t.Fatal("recv timeout")
}
}
func TestManager_deliverLatest(t *testing.T) {
// None of these need to do anything to test this method just be valid
logger := testutil.Logger(t)
cfg := ManagerConfig{
Source: &structs.QuerySource{
Node: "node1",
Datacenter: "dc1",
},
Logger: logger,
}
m, err := NewManager(cfg)
require.NoError(t, err)
snap1 := &ConfigSnapshot{
ProxyID: ProxyID{ServiceID: structs.NewServiceID("test-proxy", nil)},
Port: 1111,
}
snap2 := &ConfigSnapshot{
ProxyID: ProxyID{ServiceID: structs.NewServiceID("test-proxy", nil)},
Port: 2222,
}
// test 1 buffered chan
ch1 := make(chan proxysnapshot.ProxySnapshot, 1)
// Sending to an unblocked chan should work
m.deliverLatest(snap1, ch1)
// Check it was delivered
require.Equal(t, snap1, <-ch1)
// Now send both without reading simulating a slow client
m.deliverLatest(snap1, ch1)
m.deliverLatest(snap2, ch1)
// Check we got the _second_ one
require.Equal(t, snap2, <-ch1)
// Same again for 5-buffered chan
ch5 := make(chan proxysnapshot.ProxySnapshot, 5)
// Sending to an unblocked chan should work
m.deliverLatest(snap1, ch5)
// Check it was delivered
require.Equal(t, snap1, <-ch5)
// Now send enough to fill the chan simulating a slow client
for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
m.deliverLatest(snap1, ch5)
}
m.deliverLatest(snap2, ch5)
// Check we got the _second_ one
require.Equal(t, snap2, <-ch5)
}
func TestManager_SyncState_No_Notify(t *testing.T) {
dataSources := NewTestDataSources()
logger := testutil.Logger(t)
m, err := NewManager(ManagerConfig{
Source: &structs.QuerySource{Datacenter: "dc1"},
Logger: logger,
DataSources: dataSources.ToDataSources(),
})
require.NoError(t, err)
defer m.Close()
srv := &structs.NodeService{
Kind: structs.ServiceKindConnectProxy,
ID: "web-sidecar-proxy",
Service: "web-sidecar-proxy",
Port: 9999,
Meta: map[string]string{},
Proxy: structs.ConnectProxyConfig{
DestinationServiceID: "web",
DestinationServiceName: "web",
LocalServiceAddress: "127.0.0.1",
LocalServicePort: 8080,
Config: map[string]interface{}{
"foo": "bar",
},
},
}
proxyID := ProxyID{
ServiceID: srv.CompoundServiceID(),
}
require.NoError(t, m.Register(proxyID, srv, testSource, "", false))
watchCh, cancelWatch := m.Watch(proxyID)
t.Cleanup(cancelWatch)
// Get the relevant notification Channel, should only have 1
notifyCH := m.proxies[proxyID].ch
// update the leaf certs
roots, issuedCert := TestCerts(t)
notifyCH <- UpdateEvent{
CorrelationID: leafWatchID,
Result: issuedCert,
Err: nil,
}
// at this point the snapshot should not be valid and not be sent
after := time.After(200 * time.Millisecond)
select {
case <-watchCh:
t.Fatal("snap should not be valid")
case <-after:
}
// update the root certs
notifyCH <- UpdateEvent{
CorrelationID: rootsWatchID,
Result: roots,
Err: nil,
}
// at this point the snapshot should not be valid and not be sent
after = time.After(200 * time.Millisecond)
select {
case <-watchCh:
t.Fatal("snap should not be valid")
case <-after:
}
// update the mesh config entry
notifyCH <- UpdateEvent{
CorrelationID: meshConfigEntryID,
Result: &structs.ConfigEntryResponse{},
Err: nil,
}
// at this point the snapshot should not be valid and not be sent
after = time.After(200 * time.Millisecond)
select {
case <-watchCh:
t.Fatal("snap should not be valid")
case <-after:
}
// update the intentions
notifyCH <- UpdateEvent{
CorrelationID: intentionsWatchID,
Result: structs.SimplifiedIntentions{},
Err: nil,
}
// at this point we have a valid snapshot
after = time.After(500 * time.Millisecond)
select {
case <-watchCh:
case <-after:
t.Fatal("snap should be valid")
}
}