status-im
/
consul
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/consul.git
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
consul/proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.pb.go

387 lines
18 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Copyright headers for missing files/folders (#16708) * copyright headers for agent folder
2023-03-28 22:48:58 +00:00
// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
Make proto-public license MPL (#18531) * Make proto-public license MPL * Add proto-public dir to exclusion list in .copywrite.hcl
2023-08-21 17:31:54 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
Copyright headers for missing files/folders (#16708) * copyright headers for agent folder
2023-03-28 22:48:58 +00:00
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
// Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT.
// versions:
[Cloud][CC-6925] Updates to pushing server state (#19682) * Upgrade hcp-sdk-go to latest version v0.73 Changes: - go get github.com/hashicorp/hcp-sdk-go - go mod tidy * From upgrade: regenerate protobufs for upgrade from 1.30 to 1.31 Ran: `make proto` Slack: https://hashicorp.slack.com/archives/C0253EQ5B40/p1701105418579429 * From upgrade: fix mock interface implementation After upgrading, there is the following compile error: cannot use &mockHCPCfg{} (value of type *mockHCPCfg) as "github.com/hashicorp/hcp-sdk-go/config".HCPConfig value in return statement: *mockHCPCfg does not implement "github.com/hashicorp/hcp-sdk-go/config".HCPConfig (missing method Logout) Solution: update the mock to have the missing Logout method * From upgrade: Lint: remove usage of deprecated req.ServerState.TLS Due to upgrade, linting is erroring due to usage of a newly deprecated field 22:47:56 [consul]: make lint --> Running golangci-lint (.) agent/hcp/testing.go:157:24: SA1019: req.ServerState.TLS is deprecated: use server_tls.internal_rpc instead. (staticcheck) time.Until(time.Time(req.ServerState.TLS.CertExpiry)).Hours()/24, ^ * From upgrade: adjust oidc error message From the upgrade, this test started failing: === FAIL: internal/go-sso/oidcauth TestOIDC_ClaimsFromAuthCode/failed_code_exchange (re-run 2) (0.01s) oidc_test.go:393: unexpected error: Provider login failed: Error exchanging oidc code: oauth2: "invalid_grant" "unexpected auth code" Prior to the upgrade, the error returned was: ``` Provider login failed: Error exchanging oidc code: oauth2: cannot fetch token: 401 Unauthorized\nResponse: {\"error\":\"invalid_grant\",\"error_description\":\"unexpected auth code\"}\n ``` Now the error returned is as below and does not contain "cannot fetch token" ``` Provider login failed: Error exchanging oidc code: oauth2: "invalid_grant" "unexpected auth code" ``` * Update AgentPushServerState structs with new fields HCP-side changes for the new fields are in: https://github.com/hashicorp/cloud-global-network-manager-service/pull/1195/files * Minor refactor for hcpServerStatus to abstract tlsInfo into struct This will make it easier to set the same tls-info information to both - status.TLS (deprecated field) - status.ServerTLSMetadata (new field to use instead) * Update hcpServerStatus to parse out information for new fields Changes: - Improve error message and handling (encountered some issues and was confused) - Set new field TLSInfo.CertIssuer - Collect certificate authority metadata and set on TLSInfo.CertificateAuthorities - Set TLSInfo on both server.TLS and server.ServerTLSMetadata.InternalRPC * Update serverStatusToHCP to convert new fields to GNM rpc * Add changelog * Feedback: connect.ParseCert, caCerts * Feedback: refactor and unit test server status * Feedback: test to use expected struct * Feedback: certificate with intermediate * Feedback: catch no leaf, remove expectedErr * Feedback: update todos with jira ticket * Feedback: mock tlsConfigurator
2023-12-04 15:25:18 +00:00
// protoc-gen-go v1.31.0
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
// protoc (unknown)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
// source: annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
package ratelimit
import (
protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
protoimpl "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoimpl"
descriptorpb "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/descriptorpb"
reflect "reflect"
sync "sync"
)
const (
// Verify that this generated code is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(20 - protoimpl.MinVersion)
// Verify that runtime/protoimpl is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(protoimpl.MaxVersion - 20)
)
// OperationType determines the kind of rate limit that will be applied to this
// RPC (i.e. read or write).
type OperationType int32
const (
OperationType_OPERATION_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED OperationType = 0
OperationType_OPERATION_TYPE_EXEMPT OperationType = 1
OperationType_OPERATION_TYPE_READ OperationType = 2
OperationType_OPERATION_TYPE_WRITE OperationType = 3
)
// Enum value maps for OperationType.
var (
OperationType_name = map[int32]string{
0: "OPERATION_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED",
1: "OPERATION_TYPE_EXEMPT",
2: "OPERATION_TYPE_READ",
3: "OPERATION_TYPE_WRITE",
}
OperationType_value = map[string]int32{
"OPERATION_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED": 0,
"OPERATION_TYPE_EXEMPT": 1,
"OPERATION_TYPE_READ": 2,
"OPERATION_TYPE_WRITE": 3,
}
)
func (x OperationType) Enum() *OperationType {
p := new(OperationType)
*p = x
return p
}
func (x OperationType) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.EnumStringOf(x.Descriptor(), protoreflect.EnumNumber(x))
}
func (OperationType) Descriptor() protoreflect.EnumDescriptor {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_enumTypes[0].Descriptor()
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
func (OperationType) Type() protoreflect.EnumType {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return &file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_enumTypes[0]
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
func (x OperationType) Number() protoreflect.EnumNumber {
return protoreflect.EnumNumber(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use OperationType.Descriptor instead.
func (OperationType) EnumDescriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{0}
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
type OperationCategory int32
const (
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_UNSPECIFIED OperationCategory = 0
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_ACL OperationCategory = 1
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_PEER_STREAM OperationCategory = 2
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_CONNECT_CA OperationCategory = 3
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_PARTITION OperationCategory = 4
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_PEERING OperationCategory = 5
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_SERVER_DISCOVERY OperationCategory = 6
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_DATAPLANE OperationCategory = 7
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_DNS OperationCategory = 8
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_SUBSCRIBE OperationCategory = 9
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_OPERATOR OperationCategory = 10
OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_RESOURCE OperationCategory = 11
)
// Enum value maps for OperationCategory.
var (
OperationCategory_name = map[int32]string{
0: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_UNSPECIFIED",
1: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_ACL",
2: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_PEER_STREAM",
3: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_CONNECT_CA",
4: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_PARTITION",
5: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_PEERING",
6: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_SERVER_DISCOVERY",
7: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_DATAPLANE",
8: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_DNS",
9: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_SUBSCRIBE",
10: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_OPERATOR",
11: "OPERATION_CATEGORY_RESOURCE",
}
OperationCategory_value = map[string]int32{
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_UNSPECIFIED": 0,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_ACL": 1,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_PEER_STREAM": 2,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_CONNECT_CA": 3,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_PARTITION": 4,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_PEERING": 5,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_SERVER_DISCOVERY": 6,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_DATAPLANE": 7,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_DNS": 8,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_SUBSCRIBE": 9,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_OPERATOR": 10,
"OPERATION_CATEGORY_RESOURCE": 11,
}
)
func (x OperationCategory) Enum() *OperationCategory {
p := new(OperationCategory)
*p = x
return p
}
func (x OperationCategory) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.EnumStringOf(x.Descriptor(), protoreflect.EnumNumber(x))
}
func (OperationCategory) Descriptor() protoreflect.EnumDescriptor {
return file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_enumTypes[1].Descriptor()
}
func (OperationCategory) Type() protoreflect.EnumType {
return &file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_enumTypes[1]
}
func (x OperationCategory) Number() protoreflect.EnumNumber {
return protoreflect.EnumNumber(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use OperationCategory.Descriptor instead.
func (OperationCategory) EnumDescriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
return file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{1}
}
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
// Spec describes the kind of rate limit that will be applied to this RPC.
type Spec struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
OperationType OperationType `protobuf:"varint,1,opt,name=operation_type,json=operationType,proto3,enum=hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.OperationType" json:"operation_type,omitempty"`
OperationCategory OperationCategory `protobuf:"varint,2,opt,name=operation_category,json=operationCategory,proto3,enum=hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.OperationCategory" json:"operation_category,omitempty"`
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
func (x *Spec) Reset() {
*x = Spec{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_msgTypes[0]
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *Spec) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*Spec) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *Spec) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_msgTypes[0]
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use Spec.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*Spec) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{0}
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
func (x *Spec) GetOperationType() OperationType {
if x != nil {
return x.OperationType
}
return OperationType_OPERATION_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED
}
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
func (x *Spec) GetOperationCategory() OperationCategory {
if x != nil {
return x.OperationCategory
}
return OperationCategory_OPERATION_CATEGORY_UNSPECIFIED
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_extTypes = []protoimpl.ExtensionInfo{
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
{
ExtendedType: (*descriptorpb.MethodOptions)(nil),
ExtensionType: (*Spec)(nil),
Field: 8300,
Name: "hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec",
Tag: "bytes,8300,opt,name=spec",
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
Filename: "annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto",
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
},
}
// Extension fields to descriptorpb.MethodOptions.
var (
// optional hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.Spec spec = 8300;
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
E_Spec = &file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_extTypes[0]
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var File_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto protoreflect.FileDescriptor
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDesc = []byte{
0x0a, 0x25, 0x61, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x2f, 0x72, 0x61,
0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2f, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69,
0x74, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x12, 0x23, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e,
0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x1a, 0x20, 0x67, 0x6f,
0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x75, 0x66, 0x2f, 0x64, 0x65,
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
0x73, 0x63, 0x72, 0x69, 0x70, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x22, 0xc8,
0x01, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x53, 0x70, 0x65, 0x63, 0x12, 0x59, 0x0a, 0x0e, 0x6f, 0x70, 0x65, 0x72, 0x61,
0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x5f, 0x74, 0x79, 0x70, 0x65, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0e, 0x32,
0x32, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73,
0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65,
0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2e, 0x4f, 0x70, 0x65, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x54,
0x79, 0x70, 0x65, 0x52, 0x0d, 0x6f, 0x70, 0x65, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x54, 0x79,
0x70, 0x65, 0x12, 0x65, 0x0a, 0x12, 0x6f, 0x70, 0x65, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x5f,
0x63, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x79, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0e, 0x32, 0x36,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75,
0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c,
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2e, 0x4f, 0x70, 0x65, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x43, 0x61,
0x74, 0x65, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x79, 0x52, 0x11, 0x6f, 0x70, 0x65, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f,
0x6e, 0x43, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x79, 0x2a, 0x7d, 0x0a, 0x0d, 0x4f, 0x70, 0x65,
0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x54, 0x79, 0x70, 0x65, 0x12, 0x1e, 0x0a, 0x1a, 0x4f, 0x50,
0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x54, 0x59, 0x50, 0x45, 0x5f, 0x55, 0x4e, 0x53,
0x50, 0x45, 0x43, 0x49, 0x46, 0x49, 0x45, 0x44, 0x10, 0x00, 0x12, 0x19, 0x0a, 0x15, 0x4f, 0x50,
0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x54, 0x59, 0x50, 0x45, 0x5f, 0x45, 0x58, 0x45,
0x4d, 0x50, 0x54, 0x10, 0x01, 0x12, 0x17, 0x0a, 0x13, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49,
0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x54, 0x59, 0x50, 0x45, 0x5f, 0x52, 0x45, 0x41, 0x44, 0x10, 0x02, 0x12, 0x18,
0x0a, 0x14, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x54, 0x59, 0x50, 0x45,
0x5f, 0x57, 0x52, 0x49, 0x54, 0x45, 0x10, 0x03, 0x2a, 0xa7, 0x03, 0x0a, 0x11, 0x4f, 0x70, 0x65,
0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x43, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x79, 0x12, 0x22,
0x0a, 0x1e, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45,
0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x55, 0x4e, 0x53, 0x50, 0x45, 0x43, 0x49, 0x46, 0x49, 0x45, 0x44,
0x10, 0x00, 0x12, 0x1a, 0x0a, 0x16, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f,
0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x41, 0x43, 0x4c, 0x10, 0x01, 0x12, 0x22,
0x0a, 0x1e, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45,
0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x45, 0x52, 0x5f, 0x53, 0x54, 0x52, 0x45, 0x41, 0x4d,
0x10, 0x02, 0x12, 0x21, 0x0a, 0x1d, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f,
0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x4e, 0x45, 0x43, 0x54,
0x5f, 0x43, 0x41, 0x10, 0x03, 0x12, 0x20, 0x0a, 0x1c, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49,
0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x50, 0x41, 0x52, 0x54,
0x49, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x10, 0x04, 0x12, 0x1e, 0x0a, 0x1a, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41,
0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x50, 0x45,
0x45, 0x52, 0x49, 0x4e, 0x47, 0x10, 0x05, 0x12, 0x27, 0x0a, 0x23, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41,
0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x53, 0x45,
0x52, 0x56, 0x45, 0x52, 0x5f, 0x44, 0x49, 0x53, 0x43, 0x4f, 0x56, 0x45, 0x52, 0x59, 0x10, 0x06,
0x12, 0x20, 0x0a, 0x1c, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x41,
0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x44, 0x41, 0x54, 0x41, 0x50, 0x4c, 0x41, 0x4e, 0x45,
0x10, 0x07, 0x12, 0x1a, 0x0a, 0x16, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f,
0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x44, 0x4e, 0x53, 0x10, 0x08, 0x12, 0x20,
0x0a, 0x1c, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x41, 0x54, 0x45,
0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x53, 0x55, 0x42, 0x53, 0x43, 0x52, 0x49, 0x42, 0x45, 0x10, 0x09,
0x12, 0x1f, 0x0a, 0x1b, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43, 0x41,
0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x10,
0x0a, 0x12, 0x1f, 0x0a, 0x1b, 0x4f, 0x50, 0x45, 0x52, 0x41, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4f, 0x4e, 0x5f, 0x43,
0x41, 0x54, 0x45, 0x47, 0x4f, 0x52, 0x59, 0x5f, 0x52, 0x45, 0x53, 0x4f, 0x55, 0x52, 0x43, 0x45,
0x10, 0x0b, 0x3a, 0x5e, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x73, 0x70, 0x65, 0x63, 0x12, 0x1e, 0x2e, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6f,
0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x75, 0x66, 0x2e, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74,
0x68, 0x6f, 0x64, 0x4f, 0x70, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x18, 0xec, 0x40, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28,
0x0b, 0x32, 0x29, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x72, 0x61,
0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2e, 0x53, 0x70, 0x65, 0x63, 0x52, 0x04, 0x73, 0x70,
0x65, 0x63, 0x42, 0xa9, 0x02, 0x0a, 0x27, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69,
0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65,
0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x42, 0x0e,
0x52, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x50, 0x01,
0x5a, 0x3e, 0x67, 0x69, 0x74, 0x68, 0x75, 0x62, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2f, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73,
0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2f, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72,
0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x2d, 0x70, 0x75, 0x62, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x63, 0x2f, 0x61, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x6f, 0x74,
0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x2f, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74,
0xa2, 0x02, 0x04, 0x48, 0x43, 0x49, 0x52, 0xaa, 0x02, 0x23, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72,
0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x52, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0xca, 0x02, 0x23,
0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x5c, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c,
0x5c, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x52, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69,
0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0xe2, 0x02, 0x2f, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x5c,
0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x5c,
0x52, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x5c, 0x47, 0x50, 0x42, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74,
0x61, 0x64, 0x61, 0x74, 0x61, 0xea, 0x02, 0x26, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72,
0x70, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72,
0x6e, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x52, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x62, 0x06,
0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x33,
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
var (
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescOnce sync.Once
file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescData = file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDesc
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
func file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescGZIP() []byte {
file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescOnce.Do(func() {
file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescData = protoimpl.X.CompressGZIP(file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescData)
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
})
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDescData
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
var file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_enumTypes = make([]protoimpl.EnumInfo, 2)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_msgTypes = make([]protoimpl.MessageInfo, 1)
var file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_goTypes = []interface{}{
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
(OperationType)(0), // 0: hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.OperationType
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
(OperationCategory)(0), // 1: hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.OperationCategory
(*Spec)(nil), // 2: hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.Spec
(*descriptorpb.MethodOptions)(nil), // 3: google.protobuf.MethodOptions
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_depIdxs = []int32{
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
0, // 0: hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.Spec.operation_type:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.OperationType
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
1, // 1: hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.Spec.operation_category:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.OperationCategory
3, // 2: hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec:extendee -> google.protobuf.MethodOptions
2, // 3: hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.Spec
4, // [4:4] is the sub-list for method output_type
4, // [4:4] is the sub-list for method input_type
3, // [3:4] is the sub-list for extension type_name
2, // [2:3] is the sub-list for extension extendee
0, // [0:2] is the sub-list for field type_name
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
func init() { file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_init() }
func file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_init() {
if File_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto != nil {
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
return
}
if !protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_msgTypes[0].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
switch v := v.(*Spec); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
}
type x struct{}
out := protoimpl.TypeBuilder{
File: protoimpl.DescBuilder{
GoPackagePath: reflect.TypeOf(x{}).PkgPath(),
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
RawDescriptor: file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDesc,
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
NumEnums: 2,
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
NumMessages: 1,
NumExtensions: 1,
NumServices: 0,
},
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
GoTypes: file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_goTypes,
DependencyIndexes: file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_depIdxs,
EnumInfos: file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_enumTypes,
MessageInfos: file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_msgTypes,
ExtensionInfos: file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_extTypes,
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}.Build()
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
File_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto = out.File
file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_rawDesc = nil
file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_goTypes = nil
file_annotations_ratelimit_ratelimit_proto_depIdxs = nil
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
}