commit
4f982ae1f9
|
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ verifyBlobKzgProof(
|
|||
|
||||
```ts
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Given an array of blobs and their proofs, verify that they corresponds to
|
||||
* Given an array of blobs and their proofs, verify that they correspond to
|
||||
* their provided commitment.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: blobs[0] relates to commitmentBytes[0] and proofBytes[0]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ means it should be pretty easy.
|
|||
## Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
This is expected to run on Linux/macOS, it is not expected to work on Windows.
|
||||
In additional to `build-essentials` and `clang`, this requires `llvm` be
|
||||
In addition to `build-essentials` and `clang`, this requires `llvm` to be
|
||||
installed:
|
||||
|
||||
### Linux
|
||||
|
@ -113,4 +113,4 @@ its corpus with findings from other threads.
|
|||
|
||||
If there is a crash or timeout, the fuzzer will write a file to the target
|
||||
directory containing the input data associated with that crash/timeout. If this
|
||||
happens, please report the finding via an issue on GitHub.
|
||||
happens, please report the finding via an issue on GitHub.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Performance Tools) for profiling. Note, we also considered using
|
|||
comparison. This will not tell you how long (wall clock time) each function
|
||||
took, but it will help you determine which functions are the most expensive.
|
||||
|
||||
## Prequisities
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
On Linux (Debian), you need to install:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ human-friendly graph that generated from that profiling data.
|
|||
|
||||
#### Errors on macOS
|
||||
|
||||
Note, on macOS there may a lot of "errors" like:
|
||||
Note, on macOS there may be a lot of "errors" like:
|
||||
```
|
||||
otool-classic: can't open file: /usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
@ -78,4 +78,4 @@ my_func 189 (0.6%) of 28758 (96.8%)
|
|||
* 189 is the number of profiling samples in this function.
|
||||
* 0.6% is the percentage of profiling samples in the functions.
|
||||
* 28758 is the number of profiling samples in this function and its callees.
|
||||
* 96.8% is the percentage of profiling samples in this function and its callees.
|
||||
* 96.8% is the percentage of profiling samples in this function and its callees.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue