Vulkan-Docs/appendices/VK_NV_external_memory_capabilities.txt
Jon Leech 59750fe4c7 Change log for August 25, 2019 Vulkan 1.1.121 spec update:
* Update release number to 121.

Github Issues:

  * Add missing `structextends` attribute in `vk.xml` for
    slink:VkPhysicalDevicePipelineExecutablePropertiesFeaturesKHR (public
    issue 1018).
  * Change attributes of flink:vkCmdCopyAccelerationStructureNV,
    flink:vkCmdWriteAccelerationStructuresPropertiesNV,
    flink:vkCmdBuildAccelerationStructureNV, and flink:vkCmdTraceRaysNV to
    require that these commands execute outside renderpasses (public issue
    1021).
  * Add an issue to the `<<VK_EXT_buffer_device_address>>` appendix
    discussing the introduction of new names and aliasing by equivalent old
    names (public pull request 1024).

Internal Issues:

  * Protect the `VK_KHR_sampler_mirror_clamp_to_edge` extension with
    asciidoctor conditionals, and remove it from the core-only specification
    builds, where it had previously been force-included in the Makefile. It
    is now treated like any other extension (internal issue 1776).
  * Edit some asciidoctor anchor names starting with `features-features-` to
    just start with `features-`, since the old chapters was split into 3
    pieces. There are still some mild naming inconsistencies with anchors
    which may be addressed in the future (internal issue 1792).
  * Add `KHR` alias for the non-suffixed extension token
    ename:VK_SAMPLER_ADDRESS_MODE_MIRROR_CLAMP_TO_EDGE, for compatibility
    with naming rules for extensions (internal issue 1796).
  * Clarify requirements for external memory in NOTEs for
    sname:VkExternalMemoryBufferCreateInfo, and valid usage statements for
    flink:vkBindBufferMemory, slink:VkBindBufferMemoryInfo,
    flink:vkBindImageMemory, and slink:VkBindImageMemoryInfo (internal merge
    request 3301).
  * Make extension version numbers in `vk.xml` and extension appendices
    consistent. In a few cases, we could not recover history at this
    granularity, and left the summary of a version's change undefined
    (internal merge request 3323).
  * Fix invocation of `CodeInlineMacro` in the Ruby extension backing the
    `code:` macro, which was delegating to the wrong base class (internal
    merge request 3331).
  * Modify `reg.py` to do a better job of recognizing equivalent <enum>
    definitions.
  * Add a `sortorder` attribute to XML feature and extension tags.

New Extensions

  * `<<VK_AMD_device_coherent_memory>>`
2019-08-25 03:57:09 -07:00

77 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext

include::meta/VK_NV_external_memory_capabilities.txt[]
*Last Modified Date*::
2016-08-19
*IP Status*::
No known IP claims.
*Interactions and External Dependencies*::
- Interacts with Vulkan 1.1.
- Interacts with `<<VK_KHR_dedicated_allocation>>`.
- Interacts with `<<VK_NV_dedicated_allocation>>`.
*Contributors*::
- James Jones, NVIDIA
Applications may wish to import memory from the Direct 3D API, or export
memory to other Vulkan instances.
This extension provides a set of capability queries that allow applications
determine what types of win32 memory handles an implementation supports for
a given set of use cases.
=== New Object Types
None.
=== New Enum Constants
None.
=== New Enums
* elink:VkExternalMemoryHandleTypeFlagBitsNV
* elink:VkExternalMemoryFeatureFlagBitsNV
=== New Structs
* slink:VkExternalImageFormatPropertiesNV
=== New Functions
* flink:vkGetPhysicalDeviceExternalImageFormatPropertiesNV
=== Issues
1) Why do so many external memory capabilities need to be queried on a
per-memory-handle-type basis?
*RESOLVED*: This is because some handle types are based on OS-native objects
that have far more limited capabilities than the very generic Vulkan memory
objects.
Not all memory handle types can name memory objects that support 3D images,
for example.
Some handle types cannot even support the deferred image and memory binding
behavior of Vulkan and require specifying the image when allocating or
importing the memory object.
2) Does the slink:VkExternalImageFormatPropertiesNV struct need to include a
list of memory type bits that support the given handle type?
*RESOLVED*: No.
The memory types that do not support the handle types will simply be
filtered out of the results returned by flink:vkGetImageMemoryRequirements
when a set of handle types was specified at image creation time.
3) Should the non-opaque handle types be moved to their own extension?
*RESOLVED*: Perhaps.
However, defining the handle type bits does very little and does not require
any platform-specific types on its own, and it is easier to maintain the
bitmask values in a single extension for now.
Presumably more handle types could be added by separate extensions though,
and it would be midly weird to have some platform-specific ones defined in
the core spec and some in extensions
=== Version History
* Revision 1, 2016-08-19 (James Jones)
- Initial version