* fix: updating eip-2981 status from 'Review' to 'Last Call'.
* Triggering auto-merge with empty commit.
* fix: Review period needs to be added for last call status.
* fix: Review period needs to be added for last call status.
* update review-period-end
Co-authored-by: lightclient <14004106+lightclient@users.noreply.github.com>
The current example implementation is not compiling on Solidity because of some errors (1. interface does not support state variables nor functions that are not external, and 2. there were some mismatches between the names of the variables). This PR proposes a fix to these errors.
* fix: _value is now _salePrice, royaltyInfo() return values no longer have underscore prefix, checkRoyalties function uses IERC165 interface instead of IERC2981 interface,fixed-percentage wording revised, caveats added around percentage calculation, conversation with artist and marketplace cleaned up.
* fix: Grammar mistake.
* fix: typo, not Buyer, but Royalty recipient.
* fix: Formatting on paragraphs and fixed importing IERC165 interface.
* fix: Cleaner wording for salePrice and royaltyAmount unit of account.
* Move EIP-2981 to Last Call with some final fixes
* Final updates based on comments and change to Review
* Move EIP-2981 to Last Call with some final fixes
* Final updates based on comments and change to Review
* EIP-2681: move to last call (#3139)
Limit account nonce to 2^64-1
* Latest changes from discussion
Co-authored-by: lightclient <14004106+lightclient@users.noreply.github.com>
* - Updated links - ACD, FEM
- Added EIP editor - Matt Garnett
- recommended to open a discussion thread at FEM (only recommended place)
* Update eip-1.md
add link to FEM & add EIP editor
* Update eip-1.md
* Update eip-1.md
* Update EIPS/eip-1.md
Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>
* Update eip-1.md
Removed a line "No `discussions-to` header is necessary if the EIP is being discussed privately with the author."
Co-authored-by: Alita Moore <alita.moore805@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>
* Fix confusion BLS sigs vs BLS curve
* Fix BLS sigs / BLS curve confusion
And deleted the "standard" naming for the CFRG BLS sig draft (it is not a standard, and is far from the status of an IETF standard)
* Fix from review + IETF link
Linking to general page https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-bls-signature/ rather than version-specific (unless where relevant), as 04 will likely be superseded by a new version.
* Fix from review + IETF link
* Clarification
Co-authored-by: Alex Beregszaszi <alex@rtfs.hu>
Co-authored-by: Alita Moore <alita.moore805@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Beregszaszi <alex@rtfs.hu>
If you don't like full-width pages, you can resize your browser window. When looking at code, having artificial width limits can lead to unnecessary scroll bars.
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft, Review, or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Update eip-712.md
* just adding space to make sure bot works properly
* reverting afforementioned space
Co-authored-by: Alita Moore <alita.moore805@gmail.com>
* [ERC] MetaProxy Factory Standard
* Allocate number and add eth-magicians link
* codespell
* update section name
Co-authored-by: lightclient <14004106+lightclient@users.noreply.github.com>
There has been some desire to get some consistency across these EIPs in terms of naming. Also, `access_list` is snake case while the rest are `camelCase` so I fixed it to align with the rest (and also match casing style of 1559).
* change `o` to `0`
* use github username for author
Signed-off-by: Ratan Rai Sur <ratan.r.sur@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft, Review, or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft, Review, or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft, Review, or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
