I'm updating EIP statuses according to #2996. The mappings are as follows:
```
Draft => Draft
Last Call => Last Call
Accepted => Final
Final => Final
Superseded => Final
Abandoned => Withdrawn
Rejected => Withdrawn
Active => Living
```
I have gone through and updated all existing EIPs to match this rule, including EIP-1.
In some cases, people were using markdown citations, I suspect because the long-form was a bit verbose to inline. Since the relative path is quite short, I moved these to inline but I wouldn't be opposed to putting them back to citation format if that is desired by the authors.
In doing the migration/cleanup, I found some EIP references to EIPs that don't actually exist. In these cases I tried to excise the reference from the EIP as best I could.
It is worth noting that the Readme actually already had this rule, it just wasn't expressed properly in EIP-1 and the "Citation Format" section of the readme I think caused people a bit of confusion (when citing externally, you should use the citation format).
* Fix Markdown rendering within summary/detail
* Add vendor to .gitignore
* Remove duplicate github-pages entry from Gemfile
* Require github-pages 198
This brings in fixes to kramdown.
* Remove explicit jekyll version as github-pages brings it in as a dependency
* Update bundler dependency tree
* Fake bundler version
* use Ruby 2.3.0
* Set sane defaults for kramdown
* Fix links after kramdown update
* Remove <details> formatting from EIP-1474 as it is not working with embedded markdown
* Revert "Fix Markdown rendering within summary/detail"
* Fix email in EIP-1812
* Remove <details> formatting from EIP-1620 as it is not working with embedded markdown
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
