It appears that the format `EIP-X` is preferred to `EIPX`:
```console
$ grep "EIP-[0-9]+" * | wc -l
373
$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" * | wc -l
118
```
Also note that several of the `EIPX` references are coming from `index.html` and `EIPS/eip-1.md`.
```console
$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" index.html | wc -l
4
$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" EIPS/eip-1.md | wc -l
13
```
I have updated `index.html` and `eip-1` accordingly.
* Updated README to be consistent with EIP-1
Update README to be consistent with EIP and this PR: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/1858/
* Updated index.html
Updated index.html to use the same definitions as the readme.
* Add new two-week review process to EIPs
* Add ACCEPTED status, thanks @arachnid
* Use last call, thanks @arachnid
* Add other authors
* Re-add "request to merge"
* Add accepted as draft
* Match statuses to words used in text
* Match whitespace
* Add last call RSS
* add RSS link to EIP1
* Update deferred wording
* Provide
* "EIP authors can request"
* Correct HTML error
* review-period last date only
* Briefer review end date name
* alse
* Fully document statuses and transitions
* One implementation for draft
* Focus on the goal
* Use prior definition of final
* Use Accepted
* Use Accepted
* PR is the preferred mechanism to request status changes
* hide markdown formatting
