Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft, Review, or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
This ERC provides standard interfaces and processes for flash lenders and borrowers, allowing for flash loan integration without a need to consider each particular implementation.
I have gone through and updated all existing EIPs to match this rule, including EIP-1.
In some cases, people were using markdown citations, I suspect because the long-form was a bit verbose to inline. Since the relative path is quite short, I moved these to inline but I wouldn't be opposed to putting them back to citation format if that is desired by the authors.
In doing the migration/cleanup, I found some EIP references to EIPs that don't actually exist. In these cases I tried to excise the reference from the EIP as best I could.
It is worth noting that the Readme actually already had this rule, it just wasn't expressed properly in EIP-1 and the "Citation Format" section of the readme I think caused people a bit of confusion (when citing externally, you should use the citation format).
* Add permissions system draft
* Fix typo, add missing link, one language change
**Previously:**
>Today web3 browsers like MetaMask always prompt on a per-action basis, but this maximizes security at the cost of user friction. An alternative model of security is to allow applications to request a series of permissions from a user at a time.
**Now:**
>Today web3 browsers like MetaMask always prompt on a per-action basis. This provides security at the cost of substantial user friction. We believe that a single permissions request can achieve the same level of security with vastly improved UX.
**Reasoning:** The former can be interpreted to imply that the permissions model is "less secure." The goal of the updated wording is to preclude that interpretation.
* Add link to active related issue
* Add discussions-to link
* Add header image for proposal
* Add note on domain string
* Update ocap-ld to new name zcap-ld
* Adopt EIP 2255 name
* Fixed spelling
* Fix validations
