Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* clear more TBDs and merge Andrea's 0.9.4 spec
* fix broken links
* fix another broken link
* fix yet another broken link
* hope for the last broken link
* force bot
* please be the last broken links
* broken test vector label
* another broken link and test vector label
* all links now work in browser
* ?
* ??
* ready for review
* stop bot
* ready for review
* Michah's review
* more of Michah's review
* a little more of Michah's review
* move Kik fix from Specification to Security Considerations
* move Kik fix from Specification to Security Considerations
* incorporate Andreas Kik changes
* fix up tables
* security section
* security section 2
* reflect decisions in ACD 96
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Add a `IS_STATIC (0x4A)` opcode that pushes `1` if the current context is static (ie. the execution is in a `STATICCALL` or a descendant thereof, so state-changing operations are not possible), and `0` if it is not.
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
The current "first price auction" fee model in Ethereum is inefficient and needlessly costly to users. This EIP proposes a way to replace this with a mechanism that allows dynamically priced transaction fees and efficient transaction price discovery.
Review period has ended. Moving this EIP to Final! This EIP was originally proposed in October of 2019. It has been refined and tested in production environments. It recently helped facilitate the creation of 20,000 NFT vouchers where 500 of these vouchers were sold in a pre-sale. By including the event mentioned in this EIP we are able to effectively track the creation and distribution of these vouchers. Vouchers could be purchased in bulk and tracked effectively - saving consumers massive gas costs for bulk purchases.
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Try to clarify the meaning of EIP fields
* Remove unhelpful extra comments in the template
* Change EIP-1491 from CRLF to LF
* Remove template comments from EIPs
* Fix heading: Abstarct -> Abstract
* Update EIP-2014
* Change author list of EIP-1
* Add configuration for marking stale PRs
* Move to the right place
* Add 'greeting' for new contributors
* Better wording for close-pr-message
Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>
* Better wording for stale-pr-message
Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
My stance on this has changed over the years since I created this EIP and while I still am not outright against this change, I better appreciate why the bomb exists and am no longer interested in fighting for its removal. If someone else wants to take over this EIP let me know and we can change the author and move it back into DRAFT.
This EIP hasn't been touched for over 2 years. As an author on the EIP, I don't even remember what it is at this point and after reviewing it I no longer hold any opinions I may have held on the topic two years ago. Unless @jamesray1 plans on pushing for this, I am recommending we mark it as abandoned.
If someone later decides to pick it up again, we can always bring it back to DRAFT.
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Updated to Last Call as it has already been implemented in the Client
* Update EIP-868 to Last Call
* Update last call deadline to be 14 days from today
Co-authored-by: Alex Beregszaszi <alex@rtfs.hu>
