Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Creates Remove Difficulty Bomb EIP
The difficulty bomb operates under the assumption that miners decide what code economic participants are running, rather than economic participants deciding for themselves. In reality, miners will mine whatever chain is most profitable and the most profitable chain is the one that economic participants use. If 99% of miners mine a chain that no economic participants use then that chain will have no value and the miners will cease mining of it in favor of some other chain that does have economic participants. Another way to put this is that miners will follow economic participants, not the other way around.
With the difficulty bomb removed, when Casper is released it will be up to economic participants to decide whether they want the features that Casper enables or not. If they do not want Casper, they are free to continue running unpatched clients and participating in the Ethereum network as it exists today. This freedom of choice is the cornerstone of DLTs and making it hard for people to make that choice (by creating an artificial pressure) does not work towards that goal of freedom of choice. If the development team is not confident that economic participants will want Casper, then they should re-evaluate their priorities rather than trying to force Casper onto users.
Personal Note: I think we will see almost all economic participants in Ethereum switch to PoS/Sharding without any extra pressure beyond client defaults.
* Added more clarity on how to fix the difficulty.
* Adds Yellow Paper implementation.
* Sets EIP number.
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Started writing proposal
* Added more commentary and removed comments
* Update and rename eip-oracle_interface.md to eip-1154.md
* Add discussions-to URL
* Corrected discussions-to link
* Expand on use cases and types of oracles supported
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* First version of EIP-SDA.
* Added public discussion link.
* Update and rename eip-SDA.md to eip-1129.md
* Renamed eip-SDA.md to eip-1129.md
* Removed eip-SDA.md.
* Update eip-1129.md
* Fixed some typos in EIP 1129.
* Add eip-signTypedData
* Change namespace from personal to eth
* Change a way schema hash is combined together with data as proposed by @MicahZoltu
* Add a note about it being implemented in MetaMask as an experimental feature
* Add signerAddress as a parameter
* Add test vectors
* Fix an example
* Missing commas, periods
* Address the feedback
* Add a missing signerAddress parameter in the example
* Change the order of parameters to have an address as a second arg
* Wrote motivation
* WIP
* First draft of specification
* Fixes
* Update to new EIP format
* Assign EIP number
* Clarify encoding of short static byte arrays
* Removed Solidity changes
* Fixup
* Fix typos
* WIP EIP191
* WIP TODO
* WIP Replay attacks
* Fixes the sorted by name example encoding
* Remove Solidity hash
* Added note on replay protection
* Redesign domain separator
* Include images and simple motivation
* Fix up EIP metadata formatting
* Add domain separator
* Remove replay attacks from todo list
* Add Jacob Evans to authors
* Clarify encodeData
* Rename Message example to Mail
* Update mock signing screen
* Rework EIP712Domain
* Update Solidity example
* Update Javascript example
* Relocate files
* Rename DomainSeparator to EIP712Domain (fix)
* Move examples to separate files
* Remove httpOrigin domain parameter
* Update JSON-Schema
* Add registery of version bytes
* Add eip712 to eip191 registery
* Add requires header
* Set correct language on all snipets
* GitHub highlighting for Solidity files
* Update Web3 API specification
* Use abi.encode where possible
* Update JSON-RPC specification
* Asset path repo is ethereums
* Correctly spelling of registry
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Add draft of elliptic-curve gas cost reduction EIP
* Add status and EIP dependencies
* Lowercase preamble per observed practice
* Tweak EIP title to reflect core cause for cost reduction
The EIP listed out the precompiles, but really this is about reducing all
alt_bn128-related gas costs.
* Reduce constant factor in line with original EIP issue
For some reason this got missed when turning into PR form.
* Fix footnote formatting
* Drop extraneous code fence
* GitHub username only for EIP author line
* Label alt_bn128 gas cost EIP as EIP 1108
* Add new two-week review process to EIPs
* Add ACCEPTED status, thanks @arachnid
* Use last call, thanks @arachnid
* Add other authors
* Re-add "request to merge"
* Add accepted as draft
* Match statuses to words used in text
* Match whitespace
* Add last call RSS
* add RSS link to EIP1
* Update deferred wording
* Provide
* "EIP authors can request"
* Correct HTML error
* review-period last date only
* Briefer review end date name
* alse
* Fully document statuses and transitions
* One implementation for draft
* Focus on the goal
* Use prior definition of final
* Use Accepted
* Use Accepted
* PR is the preferred mechanism to request status changes
* hide markdown formatting
* Initial draft
* Strengthen constraint language and add noop logic path
* Add identifier property to web3 request payload
* Update example to remove error case
* Add identifier to web3 response payload for filtering
* Concretely detail DOM-specific APIs
* Update and rename eip-web3-access.md to eip-1102.md
* Remove unnecessary constraint link
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Remove call costs for precompiled contracts
* EIP number added and file name changed
* Fixed discussion-to field
* Fixed type and category fields
* discussion-to field changed to ethereum-magicians
* Change a bad change
* Changed the discussion link
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* Updates the error response for not found block.
Invalid parameters isn't quite right, since the parameter in this case was valid, but the resource doesn't exist or isn't available. Also changes `data` to just contain the block hash so that clients have an easier time parsing out the not-found block (no need to use a regex to pull out the block hash).
* Adds author GitHub name to PR
* ERC: log in / signup using ENS subdomains
This presents a method to replace the usual signup/login design pattern with a minimal ethereum native scheme, that doesn’t require passwords, backing up private keys nor typing seed phrases. From the user point of view it will be very similar to patterns they’re already used to with second factor authentication (without relying in a central server), but for dapp developers it requires a new way to think about ethereum transactions.
* Update eip-1078.md
* Update eip-1078.md
* changed dependencies
* change title to force travis rebuild
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
* ERC: Executable Signed Messages refunded by the contract
Allowing users to sign messages to show intent of execution, but allowing a third party relayer to execute them is an emerging pattern being used in many projects. Standardizing a common format for them, as well as a way in which the user allows the transaction to be paid in tokens, gives app developers a lot of flexibility and can become the main way in which app users interact with the Blockchain.
* Update eip-1077.md
* Update eip-1077.md
* Added uPort and Gnosis examples
* Swarm city
* change dependencies
* moves reference to 877
* work on setting up the eip-governable-token
* some notes
* Update and rename eip-governable-token.md to eip-recoverable-token.md
added the three levels of token recovery. considering adding separate process for loss because of theft
* Update and rename eip-recoverable-token.md to eip-1080.md
* added colon and discussion to link
* epi drafted
* minor changes made
* minor changes made
* changes to sender interface and added diagrams
* added diagrams in the markdown
* updated the diagrams
* update the headers
* made changes suggested by @arachnid
* added png to assets folder
* Formalize IPFS hash into ENS(Ethereum Name Service) resolver
* Update and rename eip-X.md to eip-1062.md
* Remove superfluous space after 'category'
* Update the URL for discussion
* Fix typos
* Fix typo
* Update Specification, Rationale and Test Cases
* Store multihash value in bytes
* Add initial EIP skeleton
* Initial take through "Rationale"
* First very rough draft of ERC20 Metadata Extension
Nearly ready for comments by Matt, Matt, and John
* Initial "Token Metadata Standard" Proposal + small change to ERC721
- Added initial “Token Metadata JSON Schema”
- Re-named “ERC721 Metadata JSON Schema” to “Token Metadata JSON
Schema” in the ERC721 EIP
* ERC20 Metadata Extension ready to read
* Update Title of ERC Metadata Extension
* Fixing Matt's Github handle
Apparently Github handles for authors are meant to be “accurate” - who
knew?
* update grammatical errors; properly format JSON to remove excess commas
* update JSON descriptions & make grammatical changes to EIP
* Changed language in Token Metadata JSON Schema to reflect use by tokens which are not NFT's. Added clarification for backwards compatibility
* update authors and contact email
* Author Fix
* Removing ERC20 Metadata Extension
This branch is going to be just the Token Metadata Standard
* Removing change to 721 and renaming to 1047
* Full ERC721 revert
No changes to ERC721 in this PR
* Add initial EIP skeleton
* Initial take through "Rationale"
* First very rough draft of ERC20 Metadata Extension
Nearly ready for comments by Matt, Matt, and John
* Initial "Token Metadata Standard" Proposal + small change to ERC721
- Added initial “Token Metadata JSON Schema”
- Re-named “ERC721 Metadata JSON Schema” to “Token Metadata JSON
Schema” in the ERC721 EIP
* ERC20 Metadata Extension ready to read
* Update Title of ERC Metadata Extension
* Fixing Matt's Github handle
Apparently Github handles for authors are meant to be “accurate” - who
knew?
* update grammatical errors; properly format JSON to remove excess commas
* update JSON descriptions & make grammatical changes to EIP
* Changed language in Token Metadata JSON Schema to reflect use by tokens which are not NFT's. Added clarification for backwards compatibility
* update authors and contact email
* Author Fix
* Removing Token Metadata Standard
This Branch will be just the ERC20 Token Metadata Extension
* Updates from reviewer comments
- Some grammar fixes
- Removed mentions of ERC721 standard code
- Added EIP # and discussion forum
* Fixing discussion-to
discussion-to instead of discussion-forum
* Should remove the change to 721
* 100% revert on ERC721
No changes to ERC721 in this PR now
* Discussions-to
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing draft EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
Nick Mudge
Afri Schoedon
Ryan Ghods
Micah Zoltu
Paul Bouchon
Zainan Zhou
Jacques Dafflon
SmeargleUsedFly
Nick Johnson
gary rong
Jordi Baylina
Paweł Bylica
jeffishjeff
Xiaoyu Wang
achon22
Brooklyn Zelenka
Pavel Motyrev
Juliano Rizzo
Alan Lu
Domino Valdano
Nate Welch
Nitro888
Witek
Lev Dubinets
yarrumretep
William Entriken
Maciej Górski
vbuterin
ThunderDeliverer
ledgerwatch
Leonid Logvinov
Nick Mudge
Leo Arias
g. nicholas d'andrea
Antonio Salazar Cardozo
knarfeh
Alex Van de Sande
Lanre Ige
James Ray
Jay Logelin
Andrew Parker
Danny Ryan
bradleat
Kashish Khullar
PhyrexTsai
Tommy Nicholas