7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
lightclient
36fee37ece
Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 2733 (#3039)
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
2020-10-13 06:37:29 +13:00
lightclient
d56af987bc
Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 2733 (#3038)
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
2020-10-12 15:24:08 +13:00
lightclient
ec36396a28
Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 2733 (#3036)
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
2020-10-12 06:28:43 +13:00
lightclient
1baf7ca05a
Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 2733 (#3035)
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
2020-10-12 06:22:32 +13:00
Micah Zoltu
15f61ed0fd
Adds rule to EIP-1 that references to other EIPs must use relative path format and the first reference must be linked. (#2947)
I have gone through and updated all existing EIPs to match this rule, including EIP-1.

In some cases, people were using markdown citations, I suspect because the long-form was a bit verbose to inline.  Since the relative path is quite short, I moved these to inline but I wouldn't be opposed to putting them back to citation format if that is desired by the authors.

In doing the migration/cleanup, I found some EIP references to EIPs that don't actually exist.  In these cases I tried to excise the reference from the EIP as best I could.

It is worth noting that the Readme actually already had this rule, it just wasn't expressed properly in EIP-1 and the "Citation Format" section of the readme I think caused people a bit of confusion (when citing externally, you should use the citation format).
2020-09-30 12:22:43 +08:00
lightclient
48d4fe8e94
Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 2733 (#2954)
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
2020-09-08 17:38:25 +12:00
lightclient
9b2251d97a
Initial draft of transaction package EIP (#2733)
* initial draft of transaction package eip

* added url for discussion thread

* assigned to eip-2733

* fix typo and update to use return opcodes instead of call data

* fix incorrect hex for returndatasize
2020-06-22 13:38:04 -05:00