I have gone through and updated all existing EIPs to match this rule, including EIP-1.
In some cases, people were using markdown citations, I suspect because the long-form was a bit verbose to inline. Since the relative path is quite short, I moved these to inline but I wouldn't be opposed to putting them back to citation format if that is desired by the authors.
In doing the migration/cleanup, I found some EIP references to EIPs that don't actually exist. In these cases I tried to excise the reference from the EIP as best I could.
It is worth noting that the Readme actually already had this rule, it just wasn't expressed properly in EIP-1 and the "Citation Format" section of the readme I think caused people a bit of confusion (when citing externally, you should use the citation format).
Review period has ended. Moving this EIP to Final! This EIP was originally proposed in October of 2019. It has been refined and tested in production environments. It recently helped facilitate the creation of 20,000 NFT vouchers where 500 of these vouchers were sold in a pre-sale. By including the event mentioned in this EIP we are able to effectively track the creation and distribution of these vouchers. Vouchers could be purchased in bulk and tracked effectively - saving consumers massive gas costs for bulk purchases.
* Try to clarify the meaning of EIP fields
* Remove unhelpful extra comments in the template
* Change EIP-1491 from CRLF to LF
* Remove template comments from EIPs
* Fix heading: Abstarct -> Abstract
* Update EIP-2014
* Change author list of EIP-1
After https://github.com/github/pages-gem/pull/683 / https://github.com/github/pages-gem/pull/690 was merged this is possible now.
This allows EIPs to use solidity syntax highlighting. Currently there are 330 instances of it:
```
$ grep "\`solidity" * | wc -l
330
```
And some EIPs used `typescript` or `javascript` as an alternative, because that was highlighted already:
```
$ grep "\`typescript" * | wc -l
16
$ grep "\`javascript" * | wc -l
25
```
Thanks @veox again in adding highlighting to rouge.
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:
- It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
- The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
- The build is passing
