From cbca62cdc521c711e661fe6b202437164b4e258c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wei Tang Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:32:24 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 1283 Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because: - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s) - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP - The build is passing --- EIPS/eip-1283.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/EIPS/eip-1283.md b/EIPS/eip-1283.md index 6c56afdc..cc340e01 100644 --- a/EIPS/eip-1283.md +++ b/EIPS/eip-1283.md @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ implementations: We provided two possible specification versions here. * For both of the two versions, we don't suffer from the optimization - limitation of EIP-1087, and it never costs more gases compared with + limitation of EIP-1087, and it never costs more gas compared with current scheme. * For Version I, it covers most common usages, and we have two edge cases it do not cover, one of which may potentially be useful. @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ gas cost the same as current scheme. For Version I, when entering a sub-call frame, a previously-marked **Dirty** storage slot will again become **Fresh**, but only for this -sub-call frame. Note that we don't charge any more gases compared with +sub-call frame. Note that we don't charge any more gas compared with current scheme in this case. In current call frame, a **Dirty** storage slot can be reset back to