status-im
/
EIPs
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/EIPs.git
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Clarify real estate transferrence fees, thank you @TCOA

This commit is contained in:
William Entriken 2018-01-24 11:26:29 -05:00
parent f3765be953
commit 001b67bda3
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
EIPS/eip-721.md
View File

@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ Creating of new deeds and destruction of deeds is not included in the specificat
**Function mutability** **Function mutability**
The transfer functions `approve` and `takeOwnership` are payable. Yes, really. The standard contemplates a real estate ownership application where transfer of property will require paying tax from the old and/or new owner. Such an application would be compliant under this specification. Note that your contract may be nonpayable (syntactic sugar for `require(msg.value == 0)`) and be compliant, see caveats. The transfer functions `approve` and `takeOwnership` are payable. Yes, really. The standard contemplates a real estate ownership application where transfer of property will require paying tax and/or various fees (including, but not limited to mining fees and pre-set transference fees), which may be paid by the old and/or new owner in any pre-arranged amount. Such an application would be compliant under this specification. Note that your contract may be nonpayable (syntactic sugar for `require(msg.value == 0)`) and be compliant, see caveats.
**Supports interface** **Supports interface**