mirror of https://github.com/status-im/EIPs.git
Clarify real estate transferrence fees, thank you @TCOA
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3765be953
commit
001b67bda3
|
@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ Creating of new deeds and destruction of deeds is not included in the specificat
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Function mutability**
|
**Function mutability**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The transfer functions `approve` and `takeOwnership` are payable. Yes, really. The standard contemplates a real estate ownership application where transfer of property will require paying tax from the old and/or new owner. Such an application would be compliant under this specification. Note that your contract may be nonpayable (syntactic sugar for `require(msg.value == 0)`) and be compliant, see caveats.
|
The transfer functions `approve` and `takeOwnership` are payable. Yes, really. The standard contemplates a real estate ownership application where transfer of property will require paying tax and/or various fees (including, but not limited to mining fees and pre-set transference fees), which may be paid by the old and/or new owner in any pre-arranged amount. Such an application would be compliant under this specification. Note that your contract may be nonpayable (syntactic sugar for `require(msg.value == 0)`) and be compliant, see caveats.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Supports interface**
|
**Supports interface**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue