Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jbirddog 36b7b2462e Remove backend references to Box (#579) 2023-10-25 16:09:25 -04:00
Dan 0f3ef00d72 BPMN.io -- Just show the message names not the ids - to assure we are only exposing the names.
SpiffWorkflow -
    - start_messages function should return message names, not ids.
    - don't catch external thrown messages within the same workflow process
    - add an expected value to the Correlation Property Model so we can use this well defined class as an external communication tool (rather than building an arbitrary dictionary)
    - Added a "get_awaiting_correlations" to an event, so we can get a list of the correlation properties related to the workflows currently defined correlation values.
    - workflows.waiting_events() function now returns the above awaiting correlations as the value on returned message events
 Backend
    - Dropping MessageModel and MessageCorrelationProperties - at least for now.  We don't need them to send / receive messages though we may eventually want to track the messages and correlations defined across the system - these things (which are ever changing) should not be directly connected to the Messages which may be in flux - and the cross relationships between the tables could cause unexpected and unceissary errors.  Commented out the caching logic so we can turn this back on later.
    - Slight improvement to API Errors
    - MessageInstances are no longer in a many-to-many relationship with Correlations - Each message instance has a unique set of message correlations specific to the instance.
    - Message Instances have users, and can be linked through a "counterpart_id" so you can see what send is connected to what recieve.
    - Message Correlations are connected to  recieving message instances.  It is not to a process instance, and not to a message model.  They now include the expected value and retrieval expression required to validate an incoming message.
    - A process instance is not connected to message correlations.
    - Message Instances are not always tied to a process instance (for example, a Send Message from an API)
    - API calls to create a message use the same logic as all other message catching code.
    - Make use of the new waiting_events() method to check for any new recieve messages in the workflow (much easier than
    churning through all of the tasks)
    - One giant mother of a migration.
2023-02-23 13:53:03 -05:00
Dan 2a800e844f * Re-work message tests so I could wrap my simple head around what was happening - just needed an example that made sense to me.
* Clear out complex get_message_instance_receive how that many-to-many works.
* Create decent error messages when correlations fail
* Move correlation checks into the MessageInstance class
* The APIError could bomb out ugly if it hit a workflow exception with not Task Spec.
2023-02-18 13:09:58 -05:00
jasquat 061c463edc fixed failing tests 2023-01-10 13:23:09 -05:00
jasquat a24fca0e30 some updates to validate xml when uploading and saving w/ burnettk 2023-01-10 12:16:24 -05:00
jasquat 5589e36632 fixed failing tests w/ burnettk 2022-11-14 17:38:44 -05:00
Jon Herron c30d6bbe1e Merge commit '883e65384f1e36a0310f4fdcff57ac486890cd5e' as 'spiffworkflow-backend' 2022-10-12 10:22:22 -04:00