spiff-arena/spiffworkflow-backend/conftest.py

128 lines
3.9 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

"""Conftest."""
import os
import shutil
import pytest
from flask.app import Flask
from flask.testing import FlaskClient
2022-11-18 21:45:44 +00:00
from tests.spiffworkflow_backend.helpers.base_test import BaseTest
from spiffworkflow_backend.models.bpmn_process import BpmnProcessModel
from spiffworkflow_backend.models.db import db
from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_instance import ProcessInstanceModel
Squashed 'spiffworkflow-backend/' changes from f9c2fa21e..5225a8b4c 5225a8b4c pyl 259f74a1e Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token d452208ef Merge pull request #135 from sartography/feature/permissions3 8e1075406 Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token 2b01d2fe7 fixed authentication_callback and getting the user w/ burnettk 476e36c7d mypy changes 6403e62c0 Fix migration after merging main 594a32b67 merged in main and resolved conflicts w/ burnettk b285ba1a1 added updated columns to secrets and updated flask-bpmn 7c53fc9fa Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feature/permissions3 201a6918a pyl changes a6112f7fb Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token 87f65a6c6 auth_token should be dictionary, not string f163de61c pyl 1f443bb94 PublicAuthenticationService -> AuthenticationService 6c491a3df Don't refresh token here. They just logged in. We are validating the returned token. If it is bad, raise an error. 91b8649f8 id_token -> auth_token fc94774bb Move `store_refresh_token` to authentication_service 00d66e9c5 mypy c4e415dbe mypy 1e75716eb Pre commit a72b03e09 Rename method. We pass it auth_tokens, not id_tokens 9a6700a6d Too many things expect g.token. Reverting my change 74883fb23 Noe store refresh_token, and try to use it if auth_token is expired Renamed some methods to use correct token type be0557013 Cleanup - remove unused code cf01f0d51 Add refresh_token model 1c0c937af added method to delete all permissions so we can recreate them w/ burnettk aaeaac879 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feature/permissions3 44856fce2 added api endpoint to check if user has permissions based on given target uris w/ burnettk ae830054d precommit w/ burnettk 94d50efb1 created common method to check whether an api method should have auth w/ burnettk c955335d0 precommit w/ burnettk 37caf1a69 added a finance user to keycloak and fixed up the staging permission yml w/ burnettk 93c456294 merged in main and resolved conflicts w/ burnettk 06a7c6485 remaining tests are now passing w/ burnettk 50529d04c added test to make sure api gives a 403 if a permission is not found w/ burnettk 6a9d0a68a api calls are somewhat respecting permissions now and the process api tests are passing d07fbbeff attempting to respect permissions w/ burnettk git-subtree-dir: spiffworkflow-backend git-subtree-split: 5225a8b4c101133567d4f7efa33632d36c29c81d
2022-10-20 20:00:12 +00:00
from spiffworkflow_backend.models.user import UserModel
from spiffworkflow_backend.services.process_instance_processor import (
ProcessInstanceProcessor,
)
from spiffworkflow_backend.services.process_instance_service import (
ProcessInstanceService,
)
from spiffworkflow_backend.services.process_model_service import ProcessModelService
2022-11-09 18:45:16 +00:00
# from tests.spiffworkflow_backend.helpers.test_data import load_test_spec
# We need to call this before importing spiffworkflow_backend
# otherwise typeguard cannot work. hence the noqa: E402
if os.environ.get("RUN_TYPEGUARD") == "true":
from typeguard.importhook import install_import_hook
install_import_hook(packages="spiffworkflow_backend")
from spiffworkflow_backend import create_app # noqa: E402
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def app() -> Flask:
"""App."""
os.environ["SPIFFWORKFLOW_BACKEND_ENV"] = "unit_testing"
2023-03-12 22:20:29 +00:00
os.environ["FLASK_SESSION_SECRET_KEY"] = "e7711a3ba96c46c68e084a86952de16f"
app = create_app()
return app
@pytest.fixture()
def with_db_and_bpmn_file_cleanup() -> None:
2023-02-20 17:34:42 +00:00
"""Do it cleanly!"""
meta = db.metadata
db.session.execute(db.update(BpmnProcessModel, values={"parent_process_id": None}))
for table in reversed(meta.sorted_tables):
db.session.execute(table.delete())
Squashed 'spiffworkflow-backend/' changes from f9c2fa21e..5225a8b4c 5225a8b4c pyl 259f74a1e Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token d452208ef Merge pull request #135 from sartography/feature/permissions3 8e1075406 Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token 2b01d2fe7 fixed authentication_callback and getting the user w/ burnettk 476e36c7d mypy changes 6403e62c0 Fix migration after merging main 594a32b67 merged in main and resolved conflicts w/ burnettk b285ba1a1 added updated columns to secrets and updated flask-bpmn 7c53fc9fa Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feature/permissions3 201a6918a pyl changes a6112f7fb Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token 87f65a6c6 auth_token should be dictionary, not string f163de61c pyl 1f443bb94 PublicAuthenticationService -> AuthenticationService 6c491a3df Don't refresh token here. They just logged in. We are validating the returned token. If it is bad, raise an error. 91b8649f8 id_token -> auth_token fc94774bb Move `store_refresh_token` to authentication_service 00d66e9c5 mypy c4e415dbe mypy 1e75716eb Pre commit a72b03e09 Rename method. We pass it auth_tokens, not id_tokens 9a6700a6d Too many things expect g.token. Reverting my change 74883fb23 Noe store refresh_token, and try to use it if auth_token is expired Renamed some methods to use correct token type be0557013 Cleanup - remove unused code cf01f0d51 Add refresh_token model 1c0c937af added method to delete all permissions so we can recreate them w/ burnettk aaeaac879 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feature/permissions3 44856fce2 added api endpoint to check if user has permissions based on given target uris w/ burnettk ae830054d precommit w/ burnettk 94d50efb1 created common method to check whether an api method should have auth w/ burnettk c955335d0 precommit w/ burnettk 37caf1a69 added a finance user to keycloak and fixed up the staging permission yml w/ burnettk 93c456294 merged in main and resolved conflicts w/ burnettk 06a7c6485 remaining tests are now passing w/ burnettk 50529d04c added test to make sure api gives a 403 if a permission is not found w/ burnettk 6a9d0a68a api calls are somewhat respecting permissions now and the process api tests are passing d07fbbeff attempting to respect permissions w/ burnettk git-subtree-dir: spiffworkflow-backend git-subtree-split: 5225a8b4c101133567d4f7efa33632d36c29c81d
2022-10-20 20:00:12 +00:00
db.session.commit()
try:
yield
finally:
process_model_service = ProcessModelService()
if os.path.exists(process_model_service.root_path()):
shutil.rmtree(process_model_service.root_path())
Squashed 'spiffworkflow-backend/' changes from f9c2fa21e..5225a8b4c 5225a8b4c pyl 259f74a1e Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token d452208ef Merge pull request #135 from sartography/feature/permissions3 8e1075406 Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token 2b01d2fe7 fixed authentication_callback and getting the user w/ burnettk 476e36c7d mypy changes 6403e62c0 Fix migration after merging main 594a32b67 merged in main and resolved conflicts w/ burnettk b285ba1a1 added updated columns to secrets and updated flask-bpmn 7c53fc9fa Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feature/permissions3 201a6918a pyl changes a6112f7fb Merge branch 'main' into bug/refresh-token 87f65a6c6 auth_token should be dictionary, not string f163de61c pyl 1f443bb94 PublicAuthenticationService -> AuthenticationService 6c491a3df Don't refresh token here. They just logged in. We are validating the returned token. If it is bad, raise an error. 91b8649f8 id_token -> auth_token fc94774bb Move `store_refresh_token` to authentication_service 00d66e9c5 mypy c4e415dbe mypy 1e75716eb Pre commit a72b03e09 Rename method. We pass it auth_tokens, not id_tokens 9a6700a6d Too many things expect g.token. Reverting my change 74883fb23 Noe store refresh_token, and try to use it if auth_token is expired Renamed some methods to use correct token type be0557013 Cleanup - remove unused code cf01f0d51 Add refresh_token model 1c0c937af added method to delete all permissions so we can recreate them w/ burnettk aaeaac879 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feature/permissions3 44856fce2 added api endpoint to check if user has permissions based on given target uris w/ burnettk ae830054d precommit w/ burnettk 94d50efb1 created common method to check whether an api method should have auth w/ burnettk c955335d0 precommit w/ burnettk 37caf1a69 added a finance user to keycloak and fixed up the staging permission yml w/ burnettk 93c456294 merged in main and resolved conflicts w/ burnettk 06a7c6485 remaining tests are now passing w/ burnettk 50529d04c added test to make sure api gives a 403 if a permission is not found w/ burnettk 6a9d0a68a api calls are somewhat respecting permissions now and the process api tests are passing d07fbbeff attempting to respect permissions w/ burnettk git-subtree-dir: spiffworkflow-backend git-subtree-split: 5225a8b4c101133567d4f7efa33632d36c29c81d
2022-10-20 20:00:12 +00:00
@pytest.fixture()
def with_super_admin_user() -> UserModel:
"""With_super_admin_user."""
return BaseTest.create_user_with_permission("super_admin")
@pytest.fixture()
2022-11-09 18:45:16 +00:00
def setup_process_instances_for_reports(
client: FlaskClient, with_super_admin_user: UserModel
) -> list[ProcessInstanceModel]:
"""Setup_process_instances_for_reports."""
user = with_super_admin_user
process_group_id = "runs_without_input"
process_model_id = "sample"
2022-11-09 18:45:16 +00:00
# bpmn_file_name = "sample.bpmn"
bpmn_file_location = "sample"
process_model_identifier = BaseTest().create_group_and_model_with_bpmn(
client,
with_super_admin_user,
process_group_id=process_group_id,
process_model_id=process_model_id,
# bpmn_file_name=bpmn_file_name,
2022-11-09 18:45:16 +00:00
bpmn_file_location=bpmn_file_location,
)
# BaseTest().create_process_group(
# client=client, user=user, process_group_id=process_group_id, display_name=process_group_id
# )
# process_model_id = "runs_without_input/sample"
# load_test_spec(
# process_model_id=f"{process_group_id}/{process_model_id}",
# process_model_source_directory="sample"
# )
process_instances = []
for data in [kay(), ray(), jay()]:
2022-11-24 17:00:26 +00:00
process_instance = ProcessInstanceService.create_process_instance_from_process_model_identifier(
# process_group_identifier=process_group_id,
process_model_identifier=process_model_identifier,
user=user,
)
processor = ProcessInstanceProcessor(process_instance)
processor.slam_in_data(data)
process_instance.status = "complete"
db.session.add(process_instance)
db.session.commit()
process_instances.append(process_instance)
return process_instances
def kay() -> dict:
"""Kay."""
return {"name": "kay", "grade_level": 2, "test_score": 10}
def ray() -> dict:
"""Ray."""
return {"name": "ray", "grade_level": 1, "test_score": 9}
def jay() -> dict:
"""Jay."""
return {"name": "jay", "grade_level": 2, "test_score": 8}