Commit Graph

997 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dan 9a32fadc2f Merge branch 'dev' into 346-waiting-task-schedule
# Conflicts:
#	Pipfile.lock
#	crc/services/workflow_service.py
2021-06-30 10:14:37 -04:00
Dan a79ba22410 fixes to get the tests passing. We were missing a dependency in the Pipfile and the data_store had some invalid imports. 2021-06-30 10:06:57 -04:00
Dan 187221537b fixing a corner case around file_data attributes. 2021-06-25 16:18:28 -04:00
Dan 628a587d97 We weren't committing to the database in the correct spot, so the delete wasn't sticking, and we were ending up with test workflows showing up in the main interface. 2021-06-23 16:39:58 -04:00
Dan Funk 48bf721b23
Merge pull request #331 from sartography/bug/356_duplicate_workflow
Bug/356 duplicate workflow
2021-06-22 17:42:24 -04:00
Dan 92ca506c8e Calls to eval no longer return the data, rather it will accept and return a key, allowing the front end to cache similar queries and not re-execute them. 2021-06-22 17:23:18 -04:00
Dan 61ad371680 Clean up the file api so we don't have a bunch of extra stuff in there. Just include the raw data from the document spraedsheet if it is available. 2021-06-22 15:08:08 -04:00
Dan 1f3febe2df Fix the panda warnings, which means we only support xlsx files now.
Include the document details when reutnring a file from the file model.
Improve the validation of file form elements.
2021-06-22 14:58:52 -04:00
Dan 07eb3f9ca8 Moving metrics into SpiffWorkflow so we can run the performance metrics deeply across both systems simultaniously.
Upgrading libraries.
Fixing deprication issue with Pandas and numpy.
We can only process xlsx files now, plain oldschool xls is fully removed.
2021-06-18 16:41:55 -04:00
Dan Funk 19d63e2aa2
Merge pull request #328 from sartography/restart-workflow-programmatically-347
Restart workflow programmatically #347
2021-06-17 10:36:46 -04:00
Dan a4caae8d64 when validating, we need to take every step to remove the workflows we create during the validation. 2021-06-16 14:40:20 -04:00
Dan acae6030f5 The API for evaluating python expressions should not raise an error, it can simply return a result of false, and provide an error to explain the problem. In this way the front end doesn't error out when it's running the script tasks but doesn't have enough information to get a valid response back.
The validation should take into account that repeating sections must be evaluated in the context of the data within the repeating section, not outside of it.
2021-06-15 16:17:15 -04:00
mike cullerton 02949dc6e2 WorkflowProcessor handles this error 2021-06-15 11:12:50 -04:00
mike cullerton c8f8888c17 Script to reset workflow. Requires workflow spec name. 2021-06-14 14:51:16 -04:00
Dan 738a984dcd Merge branch 'dev' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into dev 2021-06-11 17:21:47 -04:00
Dan 879d6e1df3 missed a critical change on the backend with the recent file updates, this assures that we properly handle repeating sections during the post process,
and we update the file doc code in those repeating sections.
2021-06-11 17:20:25 -04:00
Dan 7282419174 modified the tools api to return the expression and data with the result, making it easier to cash results on the front end, This should help drastically reduce the calls to the python_eval from the front end.
The post processors for form submissions needs to take repeating sections into account, or it won't find the files it is looking for.
2021-06-11 08:27:50 -04:00
Kelly McDonald 394906d840 Add refresh_waiting_tasks to the processor do_engine_steps so that if we have a waiting task that has met its condition prior to the scheduler running, it will go ahead and proceed 2021-06-10 08:33:24 -04:00
Kelly McDonald 5f722d675f Add a function that gets runs via a background scheduler to look for any workflows that are in a 'waiting' state - it runs the update waiting tasks and does do_engine_steps
We have a test for the function that runs, but an assumption was made that the scheduler module has its own unit tests and we do not need to test that.

fixes #346
2021-06-09 10:42:34 -04:00
Dan fce9166c4a Do not require users to be admins for viewing the document directory tab. 2021-06-09 09:51:30 -04:00
Kelly McDonald 0d8d251e8e Temp save to test dev 2021-06-09 09:24:37 -04:00
Dan 286803d10b fixing a big stupid bug I created when merging all the code and making changes to the files. 2021-06-08 14:24:59 -04:00
Dan Funk 586a0f2f1a
Merge pull request #325 from sartography/feature/file_refactor
Prefer tasks that share a parent over just the the next available tas…
2021-06-08 11:28:23 -04:00
Dan 8d79fe9d94 Fixing failing tests, and now asserting that we only perform the post_process_form if we actually have a form. 2021-06-08 11:16:10 -04:00
Dan Funk 9c4994581d
Merge pull request #324 from sartography/modify-infinite-loop-312
Modify infinite loop #312
2021-06-08 10:30:13 -04:00
Dan Funk e10b210302
Merge pull request #323 from sartography/shield-test-issue-344
Shield test issue #344
2021-06-08 08:59:58 -04:00
Dan Funk a7b208f50a
Merge pull request #322 from sartography/data-store-refactor-330
Data store refactor #330
2021-06-08 08:58:53 -04:00
Dan Funk 6937c33719
Merge pull request #319 from sartography/datastore-file-endpoints-325
Datastore file endpoints #325
2021-06-08 08:54:43 -04:00
Dan Funk 37d4e7cc79
Merge pull request #318 from sartography/340-update_study_associate_change
Add test and fix to make sure that an empty study associates list (or…
2021-06-08 08:52:44 -04:00
Dan Funk c4a6fbb516
Merge pull request #317 from sartography/337-Data-Store-IRB-Code
337 partial fix
2021-06-08 08:51:09 -04:00
Dan Funk 5881c903ca
Merge pull request #316 from sartography/326-Multi_File_Data_Store
Make sure we are using the correct script engine
2021-06-08 08:49:43 -04:00
Dan Funk 710921cfe1
Merge pull request #314 from sartography/deprecate-study-info-protocol-261
Remove protocol from study_info script #261
2021-06-08 08:47:43 -04:00
Dan 59f605c3df Prefer tasks that share a parent over just the the next available task when returning the next_task in the workflow processor. 2021-06-08 08:03:14 -04:00
mike cullerton a3a485dd34 Changed do_task_validate_only so it returns a mocked value, instead of True/False.
True/False caused problems for workflow validations
2021-06-04 11:44:55 -04:00
mike cullerton 9a63ab9c4f Change `do_task_validate_only` in study_info script to call the real do_task.
We do this so we can seed settings into the workflow for testing different scenarios using the study from validate_study_id
2021-06-03 14:28:24 -04:00
mike cullerton c41657301a Modify `test_spec` and `make_test_workflow` to accept new optional `validate_study_id` parameter.
Modify `make_test_workflow` to use study_id when creating test workflow for validation.
2021-06-03 14:22:26 -04:00
mike cullerton 0dfc96d7f6 Modified `validate_workflow_specification` to accept new optional `validate_study_id` parameter.
We then pass validate_study_id on to WorkflowService.test_spec
2021-06-03 14:19:41 -04:00
mike cullerton d657744816 Added optional `validate_study_id` parameter to the validation api endpoint. 2021-06-03 14:17:12 -04:00
mike cullerton 7f0d8a131d Import DataStoreBase from service now 2021-06-02 10:00:55 -04:00
mike cullerton 506b84a49a Import DataStoreBase from service now 2021-06-02 10:00:18 -04:00
mike cullerton e2e35b673d Moved data store code from script to service 2021-06-02 09:59:41 -04:00
mike cullerton 162dee45d3 Unused import 2021-06-01 16:34:21 -04:00
mike cullerton 2e3d8c7343 Fix for DataStoreSchema missing the file_id column.
The file_id column is a foreign key.
2021-06-01 13:51:10 -04:00
mike cullerton 1ed144536f New method for file datastore api endpoint 2021-06-01 13:50:04 -04:00
mike cullerton e9fe555e05 New `/datastore/file/{file_id}` endpoint definition 2021-06-01 13:49:21 -04:00
Kelly McDonald 8c04e228e9 Add test and fix to make sure that an empty study associates list (or a blank list) will effectively clear the extra study associates 2021-06-01 11:46:43 -04:00
Kelly McDonald a5d67bb245 337 partial fix
if the user calls the file_data_set function for a valid file with the key 'irb_code' and a value of a valid IRB document code, then we should set the irb code on the file.
2021-05-27 12:24:30 -04:00
Kelly McDonald acccf3b704 Make sure we are using the correct script engine 2021-05-26 10:50:20 -04:00
mike cullerton 384da075ef Removed references to `protocol` from the description 2021-05-20 11:54:12 -04:00
Dan ef7ee284b2 Prefer tasks that share a parent over just the the next available task when returning the next_task in the workflow processor. 2021-05-19 16:26:16 -04:00