sartography/cr-connect-workflow
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sartography/cr-connect-workflow.git synced 2025-02-18 19:06:26 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
2,064 Commits 14 Branches 0 Tags 8.9 MiB
Commit Graph

432 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dan
cf051a7d4f Merge branch 'dev' into 277-Document-pane 
# Conflicts:
#	crc/api/file.py
 2021-04-21 14:09:44 -04:00
Dan
ecff7d20d3 Adding a test for the new endpoint and cleaning up the API documenation 2021-04-21 14:00:19 -04:00
Kelly McDonald
19e94da6b6 Fix slight bug in expansion code, 
a non-expanded node was causing all parent levels to not expand.
 2021-04-20 11:11:11 -04:00
Kelly McDonald
e2197ddab9 Changes to support the frontend data pane 
fixes #277 and requires frontend branch 277-document-pane
 2021-04-20 08:12:27 -04:00
Dan Funk
277beb345f
Merge pull request #290 from sartography/auto-set-primary-bpmn-142 
Auto set primary bpmn #142
 2021-04-16 13:36:02 -04:00
mike cullerton
2374400542 Automatically set the first workflow for a workflow_spec to primary 2021-04-15 12:39:12 -04:00
mike cullerton
3332b9c7c0 Added delete_files argument to the restart_workflow api method, and pass it along to WorkflowProcessor.reset 2021-04-15 11:23:20 -04:00
Kelly McDonald
949f3be403 give an endpoint to return all files associated with a study 2021-04-12 12:23:33 -04:00
Nile Walker
a08c6b794f Updated Study Associate Endpoints 2021-03-22 17:30:49 -04:00
Dan Funk
14386b8ba9
Merge pull request #264 from sartography/bug/243_complete_all 
Bug/243 complete all
 2021-03-14 12:34:55 -04:00
Dan
6f80d816cd My privous efforts didn't take into account the fact that we use dot notation in field names. 
I've re-worked the workflow form endpoint, so that it only accepts the data that should be in the form, and ignores any other values that come back from the front end.  It seems Formly has some bugs that were introducing confusing information, and I want everything to behave consistently.
I had to re-work some of the tests, which were relying on an ability to set data through a form post without having a corresponding form to do so.
 2021-03-14 12:20:39 -04:00
Dan
15c64c862e Adding an argument to update task that will allow it to complete all remaining tasks through an "update_all" flag, 
this will allow us to remove some fairly complex logic from the front end that isn't behaving properly.
 2021-03-12 20:41:07 -05:00
mike cullerton
ef26238127 added CustomBPMNScriptEngine back in 2021-03-11 14:33:35 -05:00
Mike Cullerton
e7c78c8d0e
Merge branch 'dev' into study-associated-email-207-223 2021-03-11 12:38:47 -05:00
mike cullerton
80f1fc276f Modify api.tools.send_email to accommodate the changes to the api endpoint in api.yml 
We now accept subject, address, body (the email message), and possible data.
We now use email_service to send the message, and wrap it with the CR Connect html formatting.

**** We import DEFAULT_SENDER from config.default. Will this be a problem on testing and production? ****
 2021-03-11 11:19:02 -05:00
Dan
576aebab19 Sometimes a workflow can be completely broken and unloadable. For instance, it starts off with a engine step / script task that will not execute. So the failure happens the second it is processed. When calling reset on a workflow, we should catch the failure, and reset the workflow, so we aren't trapped in an unrecoverable state. 
To do so, I changed the WorkflowProcessor's reset method to be static, it will try to instantiate the current workflow and execute a cancel_notify event, but if that fails, it will continue and always return a new workflow processor using the latest spec.
 2021-03-09 11:52:55 -05:00
Dan
291216e081 Fixing a bug that prevented proper evaluation of a enum field where the default value was null or empty. 2021-03-08 14:00:03 -05:00
Dan
9e758c57d3 Merge branch 'dev' into bug/225_enum_lookup_same_field_name 2021-03-02 14:15:58 -05:00
Dan Funk
572eb3457a
Merge pull request #252 from sartography/customer-error-messages-192 
Customer error messages 192
 2021-03-02 13:45:38 -05:00
Dan
aac3d5c16e Bug #255, this requires the front end to pass in the name of the task, when doing a lookup. This will prevent a bug where we have multiple user tasks, with enum fields that set the same variable, but use different lookup tables to populate the dropbown or search feature. 2021-03-01 14:54:04 -05:00
mike cullerton
9d804c36d5 Merge branch 'dev' into customer-error-messages-192. 
Needed some sql changes from dev
 2021-03-01 10:29:10 -05:00
Kelly McDonald
c795dd7aea Merge branch 'dev' into 206-extend-study-access 2021-02-24 12:16:35 -05:00
Kelly McDonald
3dbe39c6fe initial checkin of changes for branch 2021-02-24 12:05:06 -05:00
Dan Funk
349c3d657a
Merge branch 'dev' into 201-changes-to-in-progress 2021-02-22 18:17:59 -05:00
Dan Funk
53fa49e668
Merge pull request #243 from sartography/183-remove-study-approval-code 
Remove Approvals per ticket 183
 2021-02-22 18:12:02 -05:00
mike cullerton
4fc2929356 Put the preamble back in to the error message. 2021-02-19 15:57:01 -05:00
Kelly McDonald
4fa0f9720a Allow frontend to honor 'view as' and fix problem with tests 2021-02-18 11:25:17 -05:00
Kelly McDonald
6fbaecf9b2 Change selection to include task events that are for someone else, but are on a study I own. 2021-02-18 08:09:13 -05:00
Kelly McDonald
003bf2f9b9 Remove Approvals per ticket 183 2021-02-16 09:05:29 -05:00
mike cullerton
39eb5c5c21 This is a decent beginning framework for customer error messages. 
It is not complete, but is in a state where we can start to interact with the front end.
Two tests are failing.
Committing so I can work on an error for Alex.
 2021-02-12 14:18:42 -05:00
Dan
c44e784eb2 Fixing a bug with the user model. 2021-02-12 09:48:41 -05:00
Nile Walker
7eeb491dfa User str decode Removed 2021-02-12 09:30:18 -05:00
mike cullerton
8a2a8b1443 Still not in working order. Committing to work on another ticket. 2021-02-10 12:28:59 -05:00
mike cullerton
3e32cdedc4 New error handler for non Api errors. Ticket 187 2021-02-09 16:35:57 -05:00
mike cullerton
fa34bee18a First commit for cleaning up error messages for customers. 
This is *not* in a working state.
Committing this so I can work on another ticket.
 2021-02-04 11:23:05 -05:00
Dan Funk
effd11f947
Merge pull request #231 from sartography/cancellations-137 
Cancellations 137
 2021-02-03 16:31:18 -05:00
Dan Funk
1eba20f420
Merge pull request #229 from sartography/workflow-spec-order-74 
Workflow spec order 74
 2021-02-03 16:18:34 -05:00
mike cullerton
c5cf3ea7ff Changed call to WorkflowProcessor.reset to reflect change from class method to instance method. 2021-01-29 14:34:09 -05:00
mike cullerton
7e76639cf3 When a study is put on hold, we now reset workflows and call any pending cancel_notify events. 
In api.study.update_study we test the study status and call the new WorkflowService method process_workflows_for_cancels.
In services.workflow_service we added the new method process_workflows_for_cancels. It loops through workflows for a study, and resets them if they are in progress.
In services.workflow_processor, we changed the reset method to be an instance method so we can call self.cancel_notify.
In tests.test_lookup_service we changed the call to WorkflowProcessor.reset to reflect the change from class method to instance method
 2021-01-29 14:05:07 -05:00
mike cullerton
c99a388405 We now set the display_order automatically. Users can modify order using the arrows. 2021-01-27 09:50:29 -05:00
Dan
5921ce9f10 Merge branch 'dev' into 152-workflow-spec-pull 2021-01-21 12:30:43 -05:00
Dan Funk
5b13195182
Merge pull request #224 from sartography/restart-with-no-data-99 
Restart with no data 99
 2021-01-20 17:22:18 -05:00
mike cullerton
9c71a503ca Python code for new restart_workflow api endpoint. Cleaned up code and docstring in get_workflow to match. 2021-01-19 15:09:20 -05:00
mike cullerton
6a9e6d3570 Restart workflow without form data. Committing so Dan can check it out 2021-01-14 15:32:14 -05:00
Kelly McDonald
cf7990ce85 Refactor for better readability due to code smell test 2021-01-12 08:54:32 -05:00
Kelly McDonald
e14b896225 Add documentation 2021-01-11 09:31:08 -05:00
Kelly McDonald
f282a9ef73 Make sure that top_level_workflow is transferred over, also include reference files in the list of files to sync 
We may want to revisit this because I used a 'Magic' workflow_ref_id of 'REFERENCE_FILES' as a special case so I could re-use most of what I already had. This works well, but we may want to structure it different.
 2021-01-11 09:21:44 -05:00
Dan
26655b26d3 merging in dev, and fixing a failing test from dev. 2021-01-08 14:42:13 -05:00
Dan
72a73c1fc4 Allow for synch to work even if the local set of workflow specifications are completely empty. 2021-01-08 13:23:01 -05:00
Dan
e5a38874f6 A hard or soft reset should also cause a 'cancel_notify' which will kick off any CANCEL events. If this happens during 
a hard or soft reset, and an error is thrown trying to fulfil a cancel event, the reset should still fire.
Sending emails still had a number of issues correctly parsing it's arguments.  This is corrected.
 2020-12-29 18:05:13 -05:00