I've re-worked the workflow form endpoint, so that it only accepts the data that should be in the form, and ignores any other values that come back from the front end. It seems Formly has some bugs that were introducing confusing information, and I want everything to behave consistently.
I had to re-work some of the tests, which were relying on an ability to set data through a form post without having a corresponding form to do so.
We now accept subject, address, body (the email message), and possible data.
We now use email_service to send the message, and wrap it with the CR Connect html formatting.
**** We import DEFAULT_SENDER from config.default. Will this be a problem on testing and production? ****
To do so, I changed the WorkflowProcessor's reset method to be static, it will try to instantiate the current workflow and execute a cancel_notify event, but if that fails, it will continue and always return a new workflow processor using the latest spec.
It is not complete, but is in a state where we can start to interact with the front end.
Two tests are failing.
Committing so I can work on an error for Alex.
In api.study.update_study we test the study status and call the new WorkflowService method process_workflows_for_cancels.
In services.workflow_service we added the new method process_workflows_for_cancels. It loops through workflows for a study, and resets them if they are in progress.
In services.workflow_processor, we changed the reset method to be an instance method so we can call self.cancel_notify.
In tests.test_lookup_service we changed the call to WorkflowProcessor.reset to reflect the change from class method to instance method
We may want to revisit this because I used a 'Magic' workflow_ref_id of 'REFERENCE_FILES' as a special case so I could re-use most of what I already had. This works well, but we may want to structure it different.
a hard or soft reset, and an error is thrown trying to fulfil a cancel event, the reset should still fire.
Sending emails still had a number of issues correctly parsing it's arguments. This is corrected.
Fixing workflow sync paths that were incorrect.
Repairing a suddenly failing test in files, that just don't make no sense.
Bumping spiffworkflow that contains a fix for issue #155
Dan Funk
mike cullerton
Mike Cullerton
Kelly McDonald
Nile Walker