77de2a8f47
Merge branch 'dev' into bug/missing_pi_name_246
2021-08-17 09:47:09 -04:00
0a2597ae36
Just a quick hot fix so that when can still report errors back to the UI even when the task_data can't be serialized, which can happen when functions are defined.
2021-08-17 09:43:08 -04:00
7027392a1b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/bug/missing_pi_name_246' into bug/missing_pi_name_246
...
# Conflicts:
# crc/services/workflow_service.py
# tests/study/test_study_associate_script.py
2021-08-12 13:01:41 -04:00
e32c1db4c8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev' into bug/missing_pi_name_246
...
# Conflicts:
# crc/models/study.py
# crc/services/study_service.py
# crc/services/workflow_service.py
# tests/study/test_study_associate_script.py
2021-08-12 12:59:15 -04:00
41e27cb454
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev' into bug/missing_pi_name_246
...
# Conflicts:
# crc/models/study.py
# crc/services/study_service.py
# crc/services/workflow_service.py
# tests/study/test_study_associate_script.py
2021-08-12 12:39:04 -04:00
2732071585
Merge branch 'dev' into bug/missing_pi_name_246
2021-08-12 12:07:25 -04:00
40727c7ce6
avoid erroring out when unable to calculate a value expression as a part of finding a default value.
2021-08-12 11:35:05 -04:00
adb1b74822
Merge pull request #352 from sartography/post-process-empty-field-408
...
Post process empty field #408
2021-08-12 10:53:26 -04:00
d07bac27ca
Fix for hidden file data field.
...
We were processing a field that didn't have a value.
Ticket 408
2021-08-11 16:43:50 -04:00
318cd34f81
bouncing to fix a bug in SpiffWorkflow that was holding outo outdated data deed within the python_script_engine.
...
This caused validation to fail for valid repeat sections, so including a fix to allow that validation to continue.
2021-08-11 14:21:23 -04:00
848c2e622f
Always use a schema to define what is being returned, it enforces consistency of the API and internally we can depend on well defined objects.
2021-08-10 16:16:08 -04:00
913c12c02d
Merge branch 'dev' into bug/pi_name_missing_246
2021-08-10 15:06:52 -04:00
41ad7935f8
Merge branch 'dev' into 367-Call-Activity
...
# Conflicts:
# Pipfile.lock
2021-07-29 09:28:21 -04:00
4c8a86f9bf
Fixed bug where processing file data only worked for enums.
2021-07-23 11:24:17 -04:00
38b8c7fcdf
Fixed email_cc test
2021-07-22 15:08:28 -04:00
a73d1794eb
Fixed Associate API Endpoint description
2021-07-22 14:09:24 -04:00
2455495457
got library side working - still need to have parent working
2021-07-22 10:20:34 -04:00
354e20c34b
Use the data_store_service to set the data_store, rather than access DB directly.
...
Pass the label explicitly (as the value)
2021-07-15 13:09:40 -04:00
dd67a5e650
Never set the date to datetime.utcnow() on DateTime fields. We want this to fall back on the func.now() method and allow the database to set the time on insert.
2021-07-12 15:58:32 -04:00
1916c4ff54
Assure we log reasonably clear errors when executing scheduled tasks in the background, so that sentry can pick them up and they can be addressed effectively.
2021-07-12 09:43:12 -04:00
7aa4b0833c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev' into feature/documents_xls_refactor
2021-07-06 13:11:08 -04:00
1b1a994360
Refactoring Reference files to use the lookup table, rather than parsing the results directly out of the spreadsheet, or attempting to cache them.
...
Adding a DocumentService to clean up the FileService, and get Documents well seperated, as it seems likely be pulled out or seperated in the future, there is now a Documents api file as well, for the same reason.
Some other minor changes are just fixing white space to assure our code is linting correctly.
I removed _create_study_workflow_approvals from the base test, as we don't use approvals like this anymore.
2021-07-06 13:10:20 -04:00
98d641f54d
Merge branch 'dev' into partial_testing
2021-06-30 16:13:31 -04:00
9a32fadc2f
Merge branch 'dev' into 346-waiting-task-schedule
...
# Conflicts:
# Pipfile.lock
# crc/services/workflow_service.py
2021-06-30 10:14:37 -04:00
2ba52a7095
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/HEAD' into partial_testing
2021-06-29 11:21:49 -04:00
187221537b
fixing a corner case around file_data attributes.
2021-06-25 16:18:28 -04:00
628a587d97
We weren't committing to the database in the correct spot, so the delete wasn't sticking, and we were ending up with test workflows showing up in the main interface.
2021-06-23 16:39:58 -04:00
1f3febe2df
Fix the panda warnings, which means we only support xlsx files now.
...
Include the document details when reutnring a file from the file model.
Improve the validation of file form elements.
2021-06-22 14:58:52 -04:00
369b518384
Removed WorkflowService.delete_test_data()
2021-06-22 11:29:00 -04:00
07eb3f9ca8
Moving metrics into SpiffWorkflow so we can run the performance metrics deeply across both systems simultaniously.
...
Upgrading libraries.
Fixing deprication issue with Pandas and numpy.
We can only process xlsx files now, plain oldschool xls is fully removed.
2021-06-18 16:41:55 -04:00
4ca94b39ce
Merge branch 'dev' of https://github.com/sartography/cr-connect-workflow into partial_testing
2021-06-17 15:12:28 -04:00
a4caae8d64
when validating, we need to take every step to remove the workflows we create during the validation.
2021-06-16 14:40:20 -04:00
acae6030f5
The API for evaluating python expressions should not raise an error, it can simply return a result of false, and provide an error to explain the problem. In this way the front end doesn't error out when it's running the script tasks but doesn't have enough information to get a valid response back.
...
The validation should take into account that repeating sections must be evaluated in the context of the data within the repeating section, not outside of it.
2021-06-15 16:17:15 -04:00
5c5b966bc4
Merge branch 'dev' of https://github.com/sartography/cr-connect-workflow into partial_testing
2021-06-15 09:11:18 -04:00
738a984dcd
Merge branch 'dev' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into dev
2021-06-11 17:21:47 -04:00
879d6e1df3
missed a critical change on the backend with the recent file updates, this assures that we properly handle repeating sections during the post process,
...
and we update the file doc code in those repeating sections.
2021-06-11 17:20:25 -04:00
7282419174
modified the tools api to return the expression and data with the result, making it easier to cash results on the front end, This should help drastically reduce the calls to the python_eval from the front end.
...
The post processors for form submissions needs to take repeating sections into account, or it won't find the files it is looking for.
2021-06-11 08:27:50 -04:00
e1a4a79b03
Added Partial Workflow spec
2021-06-09 15:21:21 -04:00
2364c240b2
Error Text Changed
2021-06-09 14:54:43 -04:00
338fe30984
Merge branch 'dev' of https://github.com/sartography/cr-connect-workflow into partial_testing
2021-06-09 14:32:01 -04:00
17077be701
exit at task
2021-06-09 12:40:38 -04:00
5f722d675f
Add a function that gets runs via a background scheduler to look for any workflows that are in a 'waiting' state - it runs the update waiting tasks and does do_engine_steps
...
We have a test for the function that runs, but an assumption was made that the scheduler module has its own unit tests and we do not need to test that.
fixes #346
2021-06-09 10:42:34 -04:00
0d8d251e8e
Temp save to test dev
2021-06-09 09:24:37 -04:00
586a0f2f1a
Merge pull request #325 from sartography/feature/file_refactor
...
Prefer tasks that share a parent over just the the next available tas…
2021-06-08 11:28:23 -04:00
8d79fe9d94
Fixing failing tests, and now asserting that we only perform the post_process_form if we actually have a form.
2021-06-08 11:16:10 -04:00
59f605c3df
Prefer tasks that share a parent over just the the next available task when returning the next_task in the workflow processor.
2021-06-08 08:03:14 -04:00
c41657301a
Modify `test_spec` and `make_test_workflow` to accept new optional `validate_study_id` parameter.
...
Modify `make_test_workflow` to use study_id when creating test workflow for validation.
2021-06-03 14:22:26 -04:00
ade7812540
Merge pull request #310 from sartography/get-primary-workflow-301
...
Get primary workflow #301
2021-05-14 12:41:48 -04:00
8a6bef5af4
New service to get the `primary workflow` for a workflow_spec, using a workflow_spec_id.
...
This is necessary because `primary` is a file parameter, not a workflow_spec parameter.
- you can ask a workflow file whether it is primary, but
- you cannot ask a workflow_spec for its primary workflow file
Now, you can use `workflow_service.get_primary_workflow(workflow_spec_id)`
2021-05-12 13:51:51 -04:00
07f3d2c2ee
Allow data from read-only fields to persist in task_data
2021-05-07 14:06:53 -04:00
Dan
nilez
mike cullerton
Kelly McDonald
Mike Cullerton