3ee95b3c39
gets master spec
2022-02-10 11:29:38 -05:00
df3f67601c
performance improvements. and last rements of load_example_data()
2022-02-09 23:29:39 -05:00
f12c4aba52
Refactor the workflow_spec_service so it doesn't cache anything, it always reads what it needs from the file system.
2022-02-09 21:06:55 -05:00
cf71f68ad9
all tests passing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2022-02-09 15:30:07 -05:00
2cc20d4b9d
really need to avoid any kind of caching in the WorkflowSpecService
2022-02-09 14:43:32 -05:00
77b1692e2f
typo
2022-02-09 13:52:48 -05:00
c830c468b6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/spec_files_wthout_db' into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-09 13:41:53 -05:00
b788bbf4f4
revert this back
2022-02-09 13:41:50 -05:00
89e02c6207
really need to avoid any kind of caching in the WorkflowSpecService
2022-02-09 13:37:57 -05:00
595b866f41
return empty list if you dont find standalones or libraries
2022-02-09 13:09:46 -05:00
e9fd76ed99
lookup service tests passing, but I need to revist this.
2022-02-09 12:11:51 -05:00
de6d7eee84
nearly all study tests work.
2022-02-09 12:03:45 -05:00
8e7c8c87c3
down to just 38 failed tests
2022-02-09 11:37:54 -05:00
148796d311
fixes add_category
2022-02-09 11:24:41 -05:00
38d64b1ffd
fixes a workflow model related test
...
yes i call a service from a service whoops
2022-02-09 11:07:09 -05:00
9576089e84
Reorder categories
2022-02-09 10:55:02 -05:00
cc915ac25a
refactoring the study service.
2022-02-09 08:50:00 -05:00
4058078c12
index, not index_of
2022-02-08 17:45:14 -05:00
2e4bab9d04
Add TODO
2022-02-08 15:04:47 -05:00
65d6728be7
pass specs to _add_all_workflow_specs_to_study
2022-02-08 15:03:00 -05:00
f1a75ca6bf
getting default display_order working correctly
2022-02-08 14:10:56 -05:00
25ecc1593a
test_workflow_spec_api passing.
2022-02-08 13:35:27 -05:00
df85e5cd7f
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of https://github.com/sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-08 12:57:10 -05:00
916418dcf3
For Dan
2022-02-08 12:53:20 -05:00
082ba18c2d
got one more test to work.
2022-02-08 11:34:07 -05:00
6c0e38c0a5
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-08 11:31:56 -05:00
dc040f190e
got one more test to work.
2022-02-08 11:30:13 -05:00
3f856355e2
Merge branch 'git-integration-596' into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
...
# Conflicts:
# config/testing.py
# crc/services/lookup_service.py
2022-02-08 10:38:03 -05:00
2bd0647cd4
No longer pass category_name
2022-02-07 16:13:38 -05:00
f40fb26a8f
a few more tests passing
2022-02-07 15:17:32 -05:00
1d7ecad51f
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-07 14:58:42 -05:00
4b8d193fb9
a few more tests passing
2022-02-07 14:58:25 -05:00
6c2690d27f
rm duplicate method
2022-02-07 14:12:29 -05:00
d64853fa5b
two passing tests around the WorkflowSpecService
2022-02-07 13:34:13 -05:00
056f901f9a
WIP - its just caos right now.
2022-02-07 12:59:48 -05:00
e4f7e14a4d
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-07 12:18:36 -05:00
1c384a78e9
the tests kind of try and run now ...
2022-02-07 12:18:32 -05:00
2a6578b785
fixed workflow.py
2022-02-07 12:10:57 -05:00
8ec39bca15
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-07 11:00:28 -05:00
ed07907ee2
at least allow the tests to spin up, even if they all fail.
2022-02-07 11:00:19 -05:00
66906c3786
fix a couple things
2022-02-07 10:57:34 -05:00
1abb2490e5
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-07 10:33:28 -05:00
4ba122fff3
WIP - completely broken.
2022-02-07 09:12:11 -05:00
699d0ab797
updated method calls in workflow.py
...
except for reordering
2022-02-04 15:31:36 -05:00
2383c7d76d
WIP - lots of random changes, trying to swtich over
2022-02-04 14:50:31 -05:00
2fb6746f6b
new methods
2022-02-04 14:45:52 -05:00
36911d35ac
Added description of the service
2022-02-04 14:03:37 -05:00
6765afbd02
WIP - Move the categories and specifications out of the database.
2022-02-04 13:51:39 -05:00
2706632cda
Fix origin/origin problem
2022-02-03 07:14:16 -05:00
6fa729900c
Bug? origin/origin/brach, rather than origin/branch
2022-02-03 07:10:38 -05:00
2d48151976
Fix when checkout branch does not exist yet
...
First attempt at merge
2022-02-03 06:47:02 -05:00
e9c7f3d9b6
Force checkout of branch when loading repo
2022-02-02 14:48:47 -05:00
21b5d034e2
authentication
...
variable name changes for readability
removed unused code
2022-02-02 14:11:41 -05:00
e103845218
fixing failing tests around default primary processes
...
Removing a ton of ununsed code from example_data.
2022-02-02 13:30:54 -05:00
a45c5959ef
First attempt at adding credentials
2022-02-02 13:24:54 -05:00
4ec6e403f5
1. Created a UserFileService, so it's clear what we use when for File Services, UserFiles, SpecFiles, and ReferenceFiles each function differently.
...
2. Reference Files and Spec Files are written to disk, they do not exist in the database at all.
2022-02-02 12:59:56 -05:00
ec054bbdf1
set tracking on the active branch
2022-02-02 11:48:05 -05:00
558d6f47e2
removed unused code from get_repo
...
started pull_from_remote
2022-02-02 11:30:05 -05:00
8a8c3de8c4
clone repo if it doesn't exist
2022-02-01 16:25:46 -05:00
c1a5032014
WIP modifying workflow service to remove value expression
2022-02-01 15:44:55 -05:00
070c3cfd5d
*** WIP ***
...
New API endpoints, and associated methods.
Services for the new endpoints
Minimal test
2022-02-01 10:49:35 -05:00
c07c429ae1
Fix for new version of Pandas. They check data type now.
2022-02-01 10:42:18 -05:00
c9b7d95a83
*** WIP ***
...
Beginning of Git integration
- added gitpython to Pipfile
- started additions for api, model, service, and a test
2022-01-28 16:11:36 -05:00
4c00a5762f
partial commit - new spec_file_service, and new spec_file_api endpoints that use spec and file name, not file id.
...
removed worklow_sync
cleaned up file and workflow models
most of the test are broken.
2022-01-28 06:42:37 -05:00
97c29bf77c
Merge pull request #449 from sartography/files-to-filesystem-572
...
Files to filesystem 572
2022-01-26 10:11:26 -05:00
d82367ab2a
Move temp_migration_service code into migration 7225d990740e
...
Delete test_files_to_filesystem and test_files_from_filesystem--they were only used to give me access to the migration methods
2022-01-26 09:58:46 -05:00
f3637ee6a0
resolving todos, as they are done, and removing commented out code that is no longer in use.
2022-01-25 16:37:17 -05:00
8529465322
Removed the method get_spec_data_files completly - using get_spec_files and get_spec_data to get this information instead.
...
Only load the spec data files if you are creating a new workflow, otherwise just deserialize the json.
Removed the stuff about calculaing the version of the spec, as we don't use it.
2022-01-25 16:10:54 -05:00
ae86ab4790
Make erroring workflows visible
...
The `process_erroring_workflows` method is called by our scheduler in __init__.py
2022-01-25 12:18:29 -05:00
91fa44b2ab
** WIP **
...
Committing so I can work on another ticket.
2022-01-21 14:37:11 -05:00
ca54b850cd
UNDO my previous commit regarding `get_files needs to have workflow_spec_id`
...
We need to call `get_spec_files` instead now
2022-01-20 14:57:32 -05:00
f815add699
1. Add a default directory for the location of SYNC files.
...
2. Added a last_updated column to the lookup table
3. The Lookup service now uses the above, and compares it to the actual file date, we can then rebuild the lookup if needed.
4. That 755 migration loads up the models, so when you change the models, the migration starts to fail. Not really sure what to do here, but modify the migration while we are in process.
2022-01-20 13:05:58 -05:00
9ea1399578
get_files needs to have workflow_spec_id
2022-01-20 09:54:22 -05:00
68820c67cb
Removed (almost) all references to WorkflowSpecDependencyFile
...
(There is still a call in the lookup service, but we need to decide how to fix that)
2022-01-19 16:12:54 -05:00
16a9a18c5b
Fixed get reference file info, and added test
2022-01-19 15:17:35 -05:00
091d71eb0f
Cleaned up code around differences between file info and file data
...
Cleaned up some api code around differences between file, spec_file, and reference_file
Cleaned up some api code around differences between file info and file data
Fixed some tests for file api
2022-01-19 13:47:14 -05:00
d83f28e1a7
Pushed so Dan can play
2022-01-18 15:55:49 -05:00
68ac056457
Merge branch 'dev' into files-to-filesystem-572
2022-01-18 08:18:14 -05:00
6da6e05171
*** WIP ***
...
code for updating spec files
some cleanup
tests pass, but we don't have all the tests we need.
2022-01-13 15:24:29 -05:00
b99ed73951
Remove unused imports
2022-01-12 15:00:26 -05:00
cfa9f00bf3
*** WIP ***
...
Moved reference files to their own service
2022-01-12 14:37:33 -05:00
b6b9482a64
*** WIP ***
...
Incremental commit. Mainly cleaning up failing tests.
2022-01-12 13:16:09 -05:00
d346589e07
1. added the ability to filter on level and user.
...
2. added a total to the response, so you can see what the total count of users is.
3. adding user_uid to the task_log table.
2022-01-12 08:58:50 -05:00
9cc91f92c3
*** WIP ***
...
cleanup - removing commented code
2022-01-11 15:55:08 -05:00
4df2ed6ce4
*** WIP ***
...
Failing tests, and missing functionality.
Committing to get stuff on Github.
2022-01-11 15:30:22 -05:00
962d05c875
1. Created a TaskLoggingService to encapsulate what we are doing with Task Logging through BPMN Script calls and API calls from the front end.
...
2. Added two api endpoints that will allow us to get all the logs for a specific workflow or study.
3. Assured that requests for logs are paginated, sortable, and can be limited to a specific code if needed.
4. Assure that we only use logging levels that match the log levels of Python.
2022-01-10 13:16:54 -05:00
f537fd7fbf
*** WIP ***
2022-01-07 15:58:23 -05:00
dc27f795c8
*** WIP ***
...
Committing because it is Friday afternoon, and my computer is acting flaky
2022-01-07 15:34:51 -05:00
86a6039dc8
*** WIP ***
...
**Many** tests are failing!
Committing so I can merge dev into this branch
2022-01-06 11:46:54 -05:00
7f9519736c
fixed some issues with how we look up records. Try to depend on the data_obj
2022-01-04 07:26:12 -05:00
2cd0f84a47
Merge branch 'dev' into files-to-filesystem-572
2022-01-03 08:06:17 -05:00
1446302a04
A quick fix for an error we are seeing in testing.
2021-12-30 15:27:31 -05:00
3480e1c8ab
use a signal, in addition to firing off a cancel notify when a workflow is restarted.
2021-12-23 15:30:09 -05:00
bd3176eea6
Fixes #578 - issue with us displaying an incorrect end event in some cases.
2021-12-22 16:27:52 -05:00
3fa5505970
Cleanup - remove print statements
2021-12-17 12:30:10 -05:00
6073412d82
Clean up imports
2021-12-17 12:03:45 -05:00
aa27df7840
Process the spec files and their metadata
2021-12-17 11:46:21 -05:00
a81f25f0ee
Just kidding. We should make deepcopy and put in fake data 4 valdiation
...
see above. previously i deleted this, because i didnt want unitializsed data in task data. well heres a hint. don't put it in task data. make a deep copy and hold on to that for validation pursposes
2021-12-16 14:47:04 -05:00
5c90ce01a6
*** WIP ***
...
Temp services `ToFilesystemService` and `FromFilesystemService` for migrating files To and From the filesystem - Not sure where these classes will end up
Tests to call the two services.
upgrade method in migration that writes workflow spec files and metadata to filesystem
2021-12-16 14:22:37 -05:00
338352017b
*** WIP ***
...
Moving files to the filesystem
Tools for reading/writing metadata for categories and specs
2021-12-16 08:41:49 -05:00
e62a99af96
Merge pull request #438 from sartography/bug/fix-task-data
...
Bug/fix task data
2021-12-13 13:31:37 -05:00
b5f2fe05dc
Merge pull request #439 from sartography/workflow-spec-delete-217
...
Problem deleting workflow spec #217
2021-12-13 13:19:56 -05:00
c46800171d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev' into bug/fix-task-data
2021-12-13 13:18:00 -05:00
daebf42a30
Move some of the work in `crc.api.workflow.delete_workflow_specification` to separate workflow_service methods
...
Added a session.commit to `delete_workflow_spec_task_events`
2021-12-13 11:04:28 -05:00
acbb8898e4
Merge branch 'more-study-statuses-562' into waiting-workflow-errors-566
2021-12-10 16:52:07 -05:00
f748fa3db8
Removed unused imports
2021-12-10 16:48:28 -05:00
9cd5022bf0
Set progress_status to in_progress when creating a new study.
...
-- I'm not sure if this is what we want.
2021-12-10 16:00:33 -05:00
f9fbb32641
Take this garbage out
...
I can say that because I originally wrote that garbage
2021-12-10 12:10:08 -05:00
962cf7c32c
Fixes problem with initializing some task data fields
...
we had a problem where sometimes, task data gets some values set in its fields to None, which conflicts with default values. this fixes that
2021-12-10 11:33:26 -05:00
52baf25459
In `WorkflowService.do_waiting`, if a workflow causes an exception, change its status from `waiting` to `erroring` so we don't continue to call it in `do_waiting`.
2021-12-09 15:33:39 -05:00
23fa28bc23
Merge pull request #434 from sartography/bug/ldap_service_rollback_expoded_the_world
...
The LDAP service didn't do a good enough check to see if the record w…
2021-12-09 06:42:02 -05:00
412290f2ab
The LDAP service didn't do a good enough check to see if the record was already in the database. This caused an error, which left the workflow in a waiting state. And that waiting state meant the error would just happen a million times over again until we pushed up this code change.
2021-12-09 06:33:30 -05:00
0cfa59bfea
Merge pull request #429 from sartography/chore/clear-form-data-553
...
Fixes #553 - Don't load Form data
2021-12-08 10:37:44 -05:00
ffafc1674a
assure we don't overwrite task data with a previous form submission if that data already exists.
2021-12-07 17:04:20 -05:00
8813098190
Updated to use new ProtocolBuilderCreatorStudy model and schema
2021-12-06 14:37:42 -05:00
5cf011f1d9
Quick fix for ldap.
2021-12-02 12:19:36 -05:00
7524e97c9a
Fixes #553 - Don't load Form data
...
adds an extension so that you can opt to clear out form data on a given task
2021-12-01 16:11:52 -05:00
ad93b5fae6
We were not correctly handing the possibility of there only being a waiting task (and no ready tasks).
...
We also had a problem with the validator throwing a 500 when it was trying tell us it would never finish validation.
2021-11-30 12:44:35 -05:00
ec9d8f8a5c
Merge pull request #425 from sartography/bug/slow_ldap
...
Remove wild-card from uid search, it performs very badly. Add a bit …
2021-11-30 11:09:42 -05:00
8cc581611e
Merge pull request #426 from sartography/feature/performance_improvement
...
Performance upgrades - study dashboard in less than 2 seconds now
2021-11-30 11:09:28 -05:00
c8c8c8b244
Merge pull request #424 from sartography/xls-xlsx-issue-540
...
Xls xlsx issue #540
2021-11-30 10:50:33 -05:00
455c1035f1
Performance upgrade to script.py - reduce the number of times we generate the augmented list of script functions for running python evals.
...
Performance upgrade to study_service.py - Don't query on the whole WorkflowModel, just get the status that we need. Saves lots of complex joins.
Performance upgrade to SpiffWorkflow - don't convert to box unless we have to do so.
2021-11-29 17:48:05 -05:00
e5b1daa3d9
Remove wild-card from uid search, it performs very badly. Add a bit of logging so we can easily see performance in the future.
2021-11-29 11:03:14 -05:00
8ec58fd6d7
Assure better error messages when parsing word documents with jinja syntax.
...
I also have a pull request into the folks that run the python docx library to improve their error messages that we depend on here.
2021-11-23 14:38:48 -05:00
4a1285b8e0
When validating a workflow, don't run the master workflow multiple times, its a huge waste of time.
...
Provide decent data when calling get_study_associate(s) scripts.
2021-11-22 17:17:19 -05:00
5bb7dbfb19
Improve the error messages returned from jinja template processing. Try to find the actual line with an error in it.
2021-11-22 14:46:33 -05:00
4d1f4429ff
Fixing a bug in enum_label that was not working when lookup up an select list from a spreadsheet.
...
Assure we raise more thoughtful error messages when running getting exceptions in engine tasks.
Field Options should always be available now due to a fix in Spiffworkflow.
2021-11-22 12:26:30 -05:00
7b02f46403
During validation, options were not being handled correctly for certain types of lookups.
2021-11-17 13:38:41 -05:00
cb77db26a3
Minor edit, for clarity
2021-11-16 12:05:20 -05:00
9f18484ebb
Grab exception when reading older xls spreadsheet into pandas
...
Renamed `xls` variable to `xlsx`, so it makes more sense
Added a hint to error_service for validation
2021-11-16 11:54:31 -05:00
8c166bd029
Merge pull request #423 from sartography/test-protocol-builder-519
...
Test protocol builder #519
2021-11-11 11:49:57 -05:00
f4f3842059
Fixing a stupid mistake.
2021-11-11 11:45:35 -05:00
197b75c6bf
Quickfix - validation was failing if we had a date object in the task data, but this isn't really a problem. We now use the same JSON serializer as flask does, when doing validations, to better verify behavior with the front end.
2021-11-11 11:18:58 -05:00
a8b7cd8bba
Merge branch 'dev' into test-protocol-builder-519
2021-11-10 16:32:34 -05:00
037692f42b
Merge pull request #422 from sartography/chore/group-repeating-validation-536
...
Fixes #536 - Group + Repeating property validation
2021-11-10 15:28:04 -05:00
e764bf937d
Merge pull request #421 from sartography/bug/validation_of_enum_label_failing_in_sub_workflows
...
Validation was failing for enum_label() expressions when called withi…
2021-11-10 15:26:03 -05:00
81f8aed68b
Merge pull request #420 from sartography/drop-tasklog-on-delete
...
Delete Task log model when deleting a study
2021-11-10 15:20:11 -05:00
84f364ce37
Merge branch 'dev' into chore/view-as-382
2021-11-10 15:16:20 -05:00
accdd281fa
Fixes #536 - Group + Repeating property validation
...
For now, we should not allow both group and repeat properties on a field together.
2021-11-09 13:21:44 -05:00
5cf742d955
remove unused import
2021-11-09 13:07:01 -05:00
d1eae3c15a
Validation was failing for enum_label() expressions when called within a sub-process. Possible (but unlikely) that this would occur outside validation.
2021-11-09 12:55:06 -05:00
aa1ba59bb1
Delete Task log model when deleting a study
...
just a minor fix
2021-11-09 10:42:47 -05:00
b193f56f35
Minor cleanup for readability.
2021-11-08 10:13:07 -05:00
6f09b0d7dd
Added comment to _is_valid_study.
...
Fixed get_required_docs. The data returned for get_required_dcs from UVA PB was *very* different than what we had.
2021-11-05 14:37:41 -04:00
6d548c2a74
*** WIP ***
...
Committing to work on another ticket
There are TODOs in study_service
2021-11-05 09:59:14 -04:00
7f163285c3
Test w/Alex's ID
2021-11-03 11:56:07 -04:00
50d4159168
info log didn't show up. Maybe debug?
2021-11-03 10:36:27 -04:00
8b6c8f9518
Logging to troubleshoot API call
2021-11-03 10:14:11 -04:00
8a6c1e1b51
Merge pull request #416 from sartography/bug/fix-hide-518
...
Fixes validation for #518
2021-11-01 16:22:24 -04:00
1866e6bba9
Fixes validation for #518
...
Well really what this does is give every field a default value of None. what that does is allow you to use value expressions even without a given default value. this part in the backend fixes validation.
2021-11-01 14:35:30 -04:00
7722b89faa
If a file was archived, users could not update the file.
...
In some situations, this kept users from re-uploading files that were previously deleted.
We now allow an archived file to be updated and unarchived.
2021-10-29 11:52:27 -04:00
702b8eaed6
add ldap endpoint that doesnt require workflow info
2021-10-28 16:19:39 -04:00
e0d1f63c08
Fix an issue with validation where we didn't properly parse dot notation in fields.
2021-10-26 14:48:06 -04:00
7959f8ca3f
Merge pull request #405 from sartography/refactor/enums_as_key_value
...
Death to enumerated dictionaries
2021-10-25 15:17:17 -04:00
a7fcaac5ef
Better messaging for the configurators.
...
We were generating 500 errors here
2021-10-22 12:53:26 -04:00
84ce24243f
add an enum_label script that will return the label given a value selection.
2021-10-21 13:57:49 -04:00
1220f7bef8
Allow embedded templates in Word documents
2021-10-21 13:37:13 -04:00
3619240bae
Move the parts for using Word documents as Jinja templates into JinjaService
2021-10-21 10:29:56 -04:00
62bf7c50bb
Move to new branch
2021-10-20 13:48:20 -04:00
1c84bd9f1b
Merge branch 'dev' into refactor/enums_as_key_value
2021-10-19 12:02:45 -04:00
5429e7da7d
All enumerated lists used in web forms should contain a single value, not a dictionary of value/labels.
...
Removing the spreadsheet.value.column and data.value.column so we just have value.column for both.
Improving the __str__ function in the ApiError class, to make debugging a little easier.
Adding a "validate_all" flask command, to help us track down any issues with current workflows in production (use this in concert with sync_with_testing)
Fixed logs of tests.
removed fact_runner.py, a very early and crufty bit of code.
2021-10-19 10:13:43 -04:00
1c02928d04
Merge branch 'dev' into jinja-include-403
2021-10-19 10:09:18 -04:00
ee839a85ed
Merge pull request #401 from sartography/email-cleanup-498
...
Email cleanup #498
2021-10-19 08:59:48 -04:00
e1b72c8edf
Merge pull request #380 from sartography/file-cleanup-466
...
File cleanup #466
2021-10-19 08:57:14 -04:00
0122029e30
*** WIP ***
...
Migrating the complete_template script stuff to JinjaService.
Having trouble with the tools stuff.
Pulled back to spot where test pass using CompleteTemplate
2021-10-18 16:56:03 -04:00
da9b902c19
Removed old commented code
2021-10-18 16:10:30 -04:00
983c4104e1
We run the same basic Jinja code in 4 different contexts.
...
Now call the the Jinja service
2021-10-16 14:20:48 -04:00
de1c987c85
New service to create and render template with Jinja
...
Allows us to include Jinja templates within Jinja templates
2021-10-16 14:17:53 -04:00
7a5de44e1d
Merge branch 'dev' into email-cleanup-498
2021-10-13 12:40:58 -04:00
bfd931e854
Merge pull request #400 from sartography/bug/nav-order-420
...
one solution for the Parallel nav order problem
2021-10-13 12:11:07 -04:00
58e75a1c8f
Change one condition to compare only user tasks, not non-user-tasks
2021-10-13 12:08:20 -04:00
3ae00d190d
Raise error if we have a problem sending email.
...
This should be processed by Spiff ultimately.
2021-10-13 12:03:48 -04:00
5d5256df3a
Merge pull request #398 from sartography/bug/422_value_expression_enum
...
When dealing with enum default values, assure that we are looking at …
2021-10-12 15:56:25 -04:00
6428e4ab0a
Merge pull request #397 from sartography/email-data-script-487
...
Email data script #487
2021-10-12 15:55:48 -04:00
dc07d42a9c
Merge pull request #395 from sartography/email-format-489
...
Email format #489
2021-10-12 15:51:57 -04:00
5706fb3ad3
Don't error out here until we decide if we are going to fully refactor emums or leave as is.
2021-10-12 14:32:51 -04:00
00e0bd5dd2
When dealing with enum default values, assure that we are looking at the '.value' attribute, not at the value itself.
...
Minor change to front end as well, please see companion ticket in the sartography_libraries.
2021-10-12 14:11:00 -04:00
63df614f41
Change workflow_id to workflow_spec_id
2021-10-12 13:43:29 -04:00
1ef18f23aa
one solution for the Parallel nav order problem
2021-10-11 11:50:03 -04:00
5df8f127c7
Fix email formatting.
...
Markdown was swallowing the carriage returns.
We use the nl2br extension now.
2021-10-08 11:26:30 -04:00
b0a6af8d5e
Merge pull request #392 from sartography/email-data-script-487
...
Email data script #487
2021-10-07 14:52:31 -04:00
fdce91507c
Improve the warning messages that come back when running the master workflow spec.
2021-10-07 14:43:38 -04:00
24932072dc
Merge branch 'dev' into email-data-script-487
2021-10-07 12:30:13 -04:00
a39e0ba219
Merge pull request #390 from sartography/varchar-category-id-483
...
Varchar category id #483
2021-10-07 12:23:56 -04:00
548c35a4a3
Merge branch 'dev' into varchar-category-id-483
2021-10-07 11:35:10 -04:00
10abf51f70
Added workflow_spec_id to WorkflowMetadata model, because the id is the workflow id, not the workflow_spec id.
...
Then, we use workflow_spec_id in StudyService when looking for workflow status.
2021-10-07 10:02:13 -04:00
be066b7d59
Add cc, bcc, and workflow_id to the email record, for reporting
2021-10-07 09:22:05 -04:00
84680ea846
Fixing multiple issues that came out of Study Info, as we debugged issue #474 related to navigating back to a previous task.
...
There was a problem with the python script engine as well that wasn't handling the de-serialize properly and didn't correctly pick back up on the script engine, and the renaming of methods in PythonScriptEngine created some conflicts with the way we override functions.
We were not handling ldap looks up efficiently, and this was also breaking in Study Info.
Finally we had a bug in SpiffWorkflow that did not allow us to reset back to the previous task in some cases where nested call activities happen far later in the process and are currently active when the reset is created.
2021-10-06 12:17:57 -04:00
572ca1db6b
Fixes for backend code after removing `name` column from `workflow_spec` and `workflow_spec_category` tables
2021-10-05 14:17:41 -04:00
b02731df17
Add some additional checks in the workflow service so we assure the data we are creating during validation can be serialized and deserialized just as it would be through the API. (Was hanging us up on dates)
...
Assure that if we generate a default value for a date in the task data, it is stored as an ISO String.
remove any unserializable data from the task_data when an error is encountered, rather than just dropping all the task_data. This case seems to happen a lot and it leaves us with nothing to go on.
2021-10-04 15:07:47 -04:00
5bf7bf3e2e
Bug fix for adding master workflow to validation
...
We now check that a workflow is in the status dictionary before looking up its status.
2021-09-30 15:48:57 -04:00
64e3cd044f
Merge branch 'dev' into file-cleanup-466
2021-09-30 14:11:59 -04:00
f898d6f502
Merge pull request #385 from sartography/ids-approval-validation-478
...
Ids approval validation #478
2021-09-30 13:59:26 -04:00
0353161402
Merge branch 'dev' into feature/381_validate_field_types
2021-09-30 13:19:36 -04:00
1251202244
Merge pull request #379 from sartography/top-level-validation-460
...
Top level validation #460
2021-09-30 13:11:03 -04:00
0202b409e1
My checkbox test was in a bad place. Moved it into each of the 2 blocks.
2021-09-30 12:34:46 -04:00
73cd729cac
Checkbox enums need to return a list.
2021-09-30 11:35:13 -04:00
8e00f16eaa
Assure that the field type provided is supported. Catches errors such as adding a custom field type of 'text_area' rather than "textarea"
2021-09-29 11:43:08 -04:00
92b9fea08d
fixing a stupid mistake that made all the people I care about suffer yesterday afternoon.
2021-09-29 10:06:17 -04:00
29798f1ba6
turned it on
2021-09-28 10:16:47 -04:00
alicia pritchett
Dan
mike cullerton
Mike Cullerton
alicia pritchett