Looks like we want to use default values, if they are provided, for validation. So good test, and I didn't have to create a new bug. Also added skipping the test about requiring a default for hidden+required fields. Maybe we don't need to after all.
If there is a default value, use it, regardless of whether the form is hidden (this is how the front end works)
(accomplished by moving the hide_epxression check -> continue stuff below the set default_value code)
Do an aboutface on saying that if a field is required but hidden, it has to have a default value. I'm just commenting this out for now, as it made getting these workflows to validate bloody impossible.
Clean up the replication of code for identifying required fields (as it wasn't consistently applied)
Removing some very broken and apparently unused methods.
The Jinja2 service was treating all the task data as a possible template, modified it to only include the referenced templates.
(This turned out not to be the problem, but it seems like a good idea to keep it in place)
There is a terrible bug with the wordwrap pipe that will die without any details if you pass it a value of None. We now cature the terrible error, and replace it with a sensible one.
Removed an unused Jinja_extensions file.
This cleans up the _evaluate method which previously accepted arbitrary args and kwargs, and now requires an expression, a context to which exectute it, and, optionally, the current task being executed if the DMN is being executed as a part of a BusinessRuleTask in a BPMN diagram.
This also cleans up several bits of duplicated code.
There is also a bit of code here to assure that the current user is included when running the master workflow.
1. Avoid ever re-generating the list of scripts that can be used in a script task. Terribly expensive as we call eval constantly, and it never ever changes once the app starts. (see script.py changes, and comments)
2. Cache the DocumentStatus list in the flask session, so we calculate it at most once per API Call. It's at least .25 seconds per call. (see study_sevice)
3. We called UserFileService.get_files_for_study (which runs a db query EVERY time) for every possible document type. Now we run the query once (study service line 321)
4. When returning a workflow, we looped through every single task in that workflow's navigation, and called the expensive spiff_task_to_api_task just to figure out it's proper display name. We run a much faster and more efficient method to calculate the display name naow (see workflow_service on lie 680, and 799)
5. A hellton of @timeit and sincetime() calls, that I want to leave in, to help debug any slowness on production.
