Commit Graph

527 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
mike cullerton 7749f3aeaf Fixed existing workflows to work with keyword arguments 2021-03-09 06:50:58 -05:00
mike cullerton 8c75217042 Test and workflow for associated user emails 2021-03-09 06:50:20 -05:00
Dan 9e758c57d3 Merge branch 'dev' into bug/225_enum_lookup_same_field_name 2021-03-02 14:15:58 -05:00
Dan ecfc2ee761 a slightly better test. 2021-03-02 14:15:29 -05:00
Dan Funk 572eb3457a
Merge pull request #252 from sartography/customer-error-messages-192
Customer error messages 192
2021-03-02 13:45:38 -05:00
Kelly McDonald 06dedd8a32 Add short_title to study, change update_study task to use kw arguments and add the short_title to the update_study script 2021-03-02 10:03:53 -05:00
mike cullerton 9a2ffb98ad Customer Error is in a place that we can try it out on testing.
So far, there are two known errors.
 - Missing condition type (Ticket 178)
 - Invalid property value in extensions tab for display_name (No ticket for this error)

We now have the option of using regular expressions to pull task_id, etc. from an error to pass back to the user in the hint.
2021-03-01 16:41:55 -05:00
Dan aac3d5c16e Bug #255, this requires the front end to pass in the name of the task, when doing a lookup. This will prevent a bug where we have multiple user tasks, with enum fields that set the same variable, but use different lookup tables to populate the dropbown or search feature. 2021-03-01 14:54:04 -05:00
mike cullerton 9d804c36d5 Merge branch 'dev' into customer-error-messages-192.
Needed some sql changes from dev
2021-03-01 10:29:10 -05:00
Kelly McDonald 0b08a95e25 Add test and make sure that the API endpoint does the right thing when we switch users - checks both associated with access and associated with no access 2021-02-25 12:20:43 -05:00
Kelly McDonald 1504779bba Make sure we have all test files 2021-02-25 11:40:45 -05:00
Kelly McDonald a1814a7727 Add some additional comments - just to be clear 2021-02-25 11:40:08 -05:00
Kelly McDonald 55f8825b3c Make sure we are testing both versions of the setting functions as well as the getting functions 2021-02-25 09:14:24 -05:00
Kelly McDonald f592a8a0b0 Added a few more tests - I think I need to test one more script endpoint 2021-02-25 09:07:46 -05:00
Kelly McDonald 9bd3aa8dcb service and scripts with working test - still needs a few more tests to try out, but should work to get Mike going 2021-02-24 12:55:23 -05:00
mike cullerton f937ac3ce9 Getting some thoughts down for the extension property error. This might force us to use regexes for the error service.
Committing so I can work on another branch.
2021-02-24 10:56:25 -05:00
Dan Funk 53fa49e668
Merge pull request #243 from sartography/183-remove-study-approval-code
Remove Approvals per ticket 183
2021-02-22 18:12:02 -05:00
mike cullerton e0de1d0b3b Fixed 3 tests to reflect a change in crc.api.workflow.validate_workflow_specification.
Added a '\n' to the error message between the actual error and our preamble.
2021-02-19 15:55:40 -05:00
Kelly McDonald 003bf2f9b9 Remove Approvals per ticket 183 2021-02-16 09:05:29 -05:00
mike cullerton c40af1d7df Modified workflow to add form field with period in the id. 2021-02-15 16:36:36 -05:00
mike cullerton 446bff9c8c Modified test for missing default value on hidden and required fields to check for task_id and task_name 2021-02-15 16:28:51 -05:00
mike cullerton 34700568ee Added a test for allowing periods in field ids 2021-02-15 16:28:21 -05:00
mike cullerton 39eb5c5c21 This is a decent beginning framework for customer error messages.
It is not complete, but is in a state where we can start to interact with the front end.
Two tests are failing.
Committing so I can work on an error for Alex.
2021-02-12 14:18:42 -05:00
Dan Funk 35773ebc29
Merge pull request #240 from sartography/weird-email-error
The email script was failing validation because of missing parameters…
2021-02-12 09:31:52 -05:00
mike cullerton d8bd203139 The email script was failing validation because of missing parameters in scripts.email.do_task_validate_only.
I added a test in tests.test_email_script to make sure we get the default email_address.
I also found and fixed a bug in workflow_service.populate_form_with_random_data where we would overwrite default_values with random text because of a missing continue.
(We don't want to continue if we have repeating fields though.)
2021-02-11 15:36:12 -05:00
Dan Funk fe4e737596
Merge pull request #238 from sartography/value-expression-failing-shield-test-194
We now allow value_expression to evaluate to an empty string ("") so …
2021-02-11 11:25:09 -05:00
Dan Funk df0cfc755b
Merge pull request #237 from sartography/get-study-from-model-error-191
We now test whether we have a valid StudyModel when getting a study b…
2021-02-11 11:23:59 -05:00
Dan Funk df25b83958
Merge pull request #235 from sartography/index-error-for-enums-186
Index error for enums 186
2021-02-11 11:21:50 -05:00
mike cullerton 39e874504f We now allow value_expression to evaluate to an empty string ("") so that we *do not* set a default value for enums in some cases.
This was causing an error because "" was not an option for the enum.
2021-02-10 14:35:58 -05:00
mike cullerton 777cfbdecd We now test whether we have a valid StudyModel when getting a study by study model.
We raise an ApiError if the model is None or empty.
2021-02-09 17:37:55 -05:00
mike cullerton 11177b4296 Test, workflow, and empty spreadsheet for the new code. The workflow references the spreadsheet, which has no rows. 2021-02-08 15:12:11 -05:00
mike cullerton eb504465f6 Test and workflow for new code.
We test 2 things.
 - If a field can be hidden and required, it must have a default value or value_expression
 - If a field is hidden and required, make sure we use the default value
2021-02-08 10:20:05 -05:00
mike cullerton fa34bee18a First commit for cleaning up error messages for customers.
This is *not* in a working state.
Committing this so I can work on another ticket.
2021-02-04 11:23:05 -05:00
Dan Funk 329146237e
Merge pull request #232 from sartography/boolean-default-values-175
Boolean default values 175
2021-02-03 16:34:54 -05:00
Dan Funk effd11f947
Merge pull request #231 from sartography/cancellations-137
Cancellations 137
2021-02-03 16:31:18 -05:00
Dan Funk 1eba20f420
Merge pull request #229 from sartography/workflow-spec-order-74
Workflow spec order 74
2021-02-03 16:18:34 -05:00
mike cullerton 1247744463 Test and workflow for new code. 2021-02-03 09:50:37 -05:00
mike cullerton 6f7abc0a97 Added tests to test_workflow_restart to make sure we call cancel_notify events when appropriate. 2021-01-29 14:48:35 -05:00
mike cullerton f9e4b6a972 Test and workflow for the new code. We test the correct cancel notify is called, and only when appropriate. 2021-01-29 14:09:42 -05:00
mike cullerton c026717b4a Changed the call to WorkflowProcessor.reset to reflect the change from class method to instance method 2021-01-29 14:06:25 -05:00
mike cullerton 7e76639cf3 When a study is put on hold, we now reset workflows and call any pending cancel_notify events.
In api.study.update_study we test the study status and call the new WorkflowService method process_workflows_for_cancels.
In services.workflow_service we added the new method process_workflows_for_cancels. It loops through workflows for a study, and resets them if they are in progress.
In services.workflow_processor, we changed the reset method to be an instance method so we can call self.cancel_notify.
In tests.test_lookup_service we changed the call to WorkflowProcessor.reset to reflect the change from class method to instance method
2021-01-29 14:05:07 -05:00
mike cullerton 7b91fb9f61 Modified test to check for display_order within workflow category. 2021-01-27 11:08:28 -05:00
Dan Funk cccb722e07
Merge pull request #226 from sartography/enum_default_value_expression_162
Enum default value expression 162
2021-01-27 10:43:46 -05:00
mike cullerton 420ef0b2b0 Test and data for cleaning up my smell. We now test explicitly whether a task has both a default_value and value_expression. If so, we raise an error. 2021-01-27 10:22:43 -05:00
Dan Funk 98f946c119
Merge pull request #227 from sartography/missing_form_key_163
Missing form key 163
2021-01-27 09:42:46 -05:00
mike cullerton d01f8e1018 This workflow had a form with a missing form key, so it's associated test failed after my changes in this ticket. I added a form key to the form. Test now passes. 2021-01-22 12:16:02 -05:00
mike cullerton 2438779470 Test and workflow file for missing form key. Ticket 163 2021-01-22 12:14:59 -05:00
mike cullerton 1ee6a11d46 Test and associated data files for setting enum default values from value_expression. Ticket 162 2021-01-22 10:01:20 -05:00
Dan 5921ce9f10 Merge branch 'dev' into 152-workflow-spec-pull 2021-01-21 12:30:43 -05:00
Dan Funk 5b13195182
Merge pull request #224 from sartography/restart-with-no-data-99
Restart with no data 99
2021-01-20 17:22:18 -05:00