Commit Graph

1492 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dan Funk df25b83958
Merge pull request #235 from sartography/index-error-for-enums-186
Index error for enums 186
2021-02-11 11:21:50 -05:00
Dan Funk 10b9c7b892
Merge pull request #234 from sartography/hidden-and-required-fields-185
Hidden and required fields 185
2021-02-11 11:20:35 -05:00
Dan f7337f4e54 Merge branch 'dev' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into dev 2021-02-11 11:17:56 -05:00
Dan 2ada9f6f42 Private Ldap settings 2021-02-11 11:17:21 -05:00
mike cullerton 39e874504f We now allow value_expression to evaluate to an empty string ("") so that we *do not* set a default value for enums in some cases.
This was causing an error because "" was not an option for the enum.
2021-02-10 14:35:58 -05:00
Kelly McDonald da0af14724 Changes to enable front-end changes
Added a human readable name to created user

added last updated task time and name,

added is_review on the workflow which is triggered by a swimlane with a name present.

Notably - it does NOT update or change any of the performance concerns that we were having with this.
2021-02-10 11:58:19 -05:00
mike cullerton 777cfbdecd We now test whether we have a valid StudyModel when getting a study by study model.
We raise an ApiError if the model is None or empty.
2021-02-09 17:37:55 -05:00
mike cullerton 3e32cdedc4 New error handler for non Api errors. Ticket 187 2021-02-09 16:35:57 -05:00
mike cullerton 11177b4296 Test, workflow, and empty spreadsheet for the new code. The workflow references the spreadsheet, which has no rows. 2021-02-08 15:12:11 -05:00
mike cullerton b42b843f7d It was possible for an enum field lookup to return an empty list. This meant there were no options for the list.
We now test for this and raise an error.
2021-02-08 15:10:53 -05:00
Dan Funk c14a72719c
Merge pull request #233 from sartography/dev
Dev to testing
2021-02-08 10:32:07 -05:00
mike cullerton eb504465f6 Test and workflow for new code.
We test 2 things.
 - If a field can be hidden and required, it must have a default value or value_expression
 - If a field is hidden and required, make sure we use the default value
2021-02-08 10:20:05 -05:00
mike cullerton e87e7b5b8b Form fields that can be hidden and required must now have a default value or value_expression.
Also, if a field is hidden but not required, it should not produce a value.
2021-02-08 10:18:41 -05:00
Dan Funk 329146237e
Merge pull request #232 from sartography/boolean-default-values-175
Boolean default values 175
2021-02-03 16:34:54 -05:00
Dan Funk effd11f947
Merge pull request #231 from sartography/cancellations-137
Cancellations 137
2021-02-03 16:31:18 -05:00
Dan Funk 2d01b92a50
Merge pull request #230 from sartography/pretty-emails-160
Pretty emails 160
2021-02-03 16:20:38 -05:00
Dan Funk 1eba20f420
Merge pull request #229 from sartography/workflow-spec-order-74
Workflow spec order 74
2021-02-03 16:18:34 -05:00
mike cullerton 1247744463 Test and workflow for new code. 2021-02-03 09:50:37 -05:00
mike cullerton b090e31e00 This fixes 2 issues with setting boolean defaults
- If the default was False, we failed an early test and returned None. We now only return None if default is None
 - We have a better test for deciding if the default value we return should be True or False. We used to return True if the value was the string 'false'.
2021-02-03 09:50:16 -05:00
mike cullerton 6f7abc0a97 Added tests to test_workflow_restart to make sure we call cancel_notify events when appropriate. 2021-01-29 14:48:35 -05:00
mike cullerton c5cf3ea7ff Changed call to WorkflowProcessor.reset to reflect change from class method to instance method. 2021-01-29 14:34:09 -05:00
mike cullerton f9e4b6a972 Test and workflow for the new code. We test the correct cancel notify is called, and only when appropriate. 2021-01-29 14:09:42 -05:00
mike cullerton c026717b4a Changed the call to WorkflowProcessor.reset to reflect the change from class method to instance method 2021-01-29 14:06:25 -05:00
mike cullerton 7e76639cf3 When a study is put on hold, we now reset workflows and call any pending cancel_notify events.
In api.study.update_study we test the study status and call the new WorkflowService method process_workflows_for_cancels.
In services.workflow_service we added the new method process_workflows_for_cancels. It loops through workflows for a study, and resets them if they are in progress.
In services.workflow_processor, we changed the reset method to be an instance method so we can call self.cancel_notify.
In tests.test_lookup_service we changed the call to WorkflowProcessor.reset to reflect the change from class method to instance method
2021-01-29 14:05:07 -05:00
mike cullerton 83632c64de added exclusion for email template in sonarcloud properties file. 2021-01-28 10:42:15 -05:00
mike cullerton 958d5a6281 Possible solution for W3C issues raised by Sonarcloud 2021-01-28 09:45:53 -05:00
mike cullerton d7a3afe8f4 changed the template to use the responsive html email template at https://github.com/leemunroe/responsive-html-email-template
added method get_cr_connect_wrapper to render our new html email template. This takes the email text generated from the task element documentation as the email_body.
2021-01-27 17:12:03 -05:00
Dan Funk 328de0e584
Merge pull request #228 from sartography/dev
Dev to Test
2021-01-27 11:32:00 -05:00
mike cullerton 7b91fb9f61 Modified test to check for display_order within workflow category. 2021-01-27 11:08:28 -05:00
Dan Funk cccb722e07
Merge pull request #226 from sartography/enum_default_value_expression_162
Enum default value expression 162
2021-01-27 10:43:46 -05:00
mike cullerton 420ef0b2b0 Test and data for cleaning up my smell. We now test explicitly whether a task has both a default_value and value_expression. If so, we raise an error. 2021-01-27 10:22:43 -05:00
mike cullerton 81e55b6055 Cleaning up my smell. A task should only have default_value *or* value_expresion, not both. 2021-01-27 10:21:13 -05:00
mike cullerton c99a388405 We now set the display_order automatically. Users can modify order using the arrows. 2021-01-27 09:50:29 -05:00
Dan Funk 98f946c119
Merge pull request #227 from sartography/missing_form_key_163
Missing form key 163
2021-01-27 09:42:46 -05:00
Dan Funk 691b779a0c
Merge pull request #223 from sartography/152-workflow-spec-pull
152 workflow spec pull
2021-01-27 09:39:09 -05:00
mike cullerton e72be4a217 Needed to define SERVER_NAME so get_url worked properly. Made the port into a constant in config.default so I can import it into config.testing.
Dan, I'm not sure this is the best approach. Let me know if you want something different.
2021-01-26 09:35:35 -05:00
mike cullerton ecc553c4ea Jinja templates and svg file for pretty emails 2021-01-26 09:20:16 -05:00
mike cullerton 909af9b8d6 Change HTML emails so they look like the CR-Connect website. Add logo, color, style, etc.
Cleaned up email script a little.
Also, email script no longer uses services.mails. It uses email_service directly now.
2021-01-26 09:19:28 -05:00
mike cullerton d01f8e1018 This workflow had a form with a missing form key, so it's associated test failed after my changes in this ticket. I added a form key to the form. Test now passes. 2021-01-22 12:16:02 -05:00
mike cullerton 2438779470 Test and workflow file for missing form key. Ticket 163 2021-01-22 12:14:59 -05:00
mike cullerton b71fd93dd4 We now make sure that forms have a form key. Ticket 163 2021-01-22 12:14:17 -05:00
mike cullerton 1ee6a11d46 Test and associated data files for setting enum default values from value_expression. Ticket 162 2021-01-22 10:01:20 -05:00
mike cullerton 00d9276483 In spiff_task_to_api_task, when looping through fields, if the field doesn't have a value, we now try to set it with the default value
In test_spec, we now check for FIELD_PROP_VALUE_EXPRESSION when setting default values
2021-01-22 10:00:28 -05:00
Dan 5921ce9f10 Merge branch 'dev' into 152-workflow-spec-pull 2021-01-21 12:30:43 -05:00
Dan Funk c60754155f
Merge pull request #225 from sartography/dev
dev to testing
2021-01-20 17:49:40 -05:00
Dan Funk 5b13195182
Merge pull request #224 from sartography/restart-with-no-data-99
Restart with no data 99
2021-01-20 17:22:18 -05:00
Dan 41dac33039 Removed two tests around soft_reset that are no longer required.
Reset should construct the workflow_processor, thus completing the reset process.
Removed the spec argument from init, as it is never used anywhere.
2021-01-20 13:24:53 -05:00
Dan 6a7ee09a5d Updating the readme file. 2021-01-20 11:00:41 -05:00
mike cullerton 27a8383898 Not sure about this one. We no longer support the task this test is testing (soft_reset). I commented out that part of the test. We can discuss, if necessary. 2021-01-19 15:44:11 -05:00
mike cullerton 61d366c111 Fixed hard_reset test. Now we reset the workflow and run do_engine_steps 2021-01-19 15:39:59 -05:00