Add errorOption example to Readme

Added example for errorOption conversion in Readme.

Readme.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Use the [Nimble][3] package manager to add `questionable` to an existing
 project. Add the following to its .nimble file:
 
 ```nim
-requires "questionable >= 0.10.14 & < 0.11.0"
+requires "questionable >= 0.10.15 & < 0.11.0"
 ```
 
 If you want to make use of Result types, then you also have to add either the
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ have to explicitly import the `questionable/results` module:
 import questionable/results
 ```
 
-You can use `?!` make a Result type. These Result types either hold a value or
+You can use `?!` to make a Result type. These Result types either hold a value or
 an error. For example the type `?!int` is short for `Result[int, ref
 CatchableError]`.
 
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ Any Result can be converted to an Option:
 
 ```nim
 let converted = works().option  # equals @[1, 1, 2, 2, 2].some
+let errOption = fails().errorOption # option that is set when the Result holds an error
 ```
 
 [1]: https://nim-lang.org/docs/options.html

questionable.nimble

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-version = "0.10.14"
+version = "0.10.15"
 author = "Questionable Authors"
 description = "Elegant optional types"
 license = "MIT"

questionable/private/binderror.nim

@@ -11,26 +11,28 @@ macro captureBindError*(error: var ref CatchableError, expression): auto =
 
   # name of the error variable as a string literal
   let errorVariableName = newLit($error)
+
+  let evaluated = genSym(nskLet, "evaluated")
   quote do:
     # add error variable to the top of the stack
     static: errorVariableNames.add(`errorVariableName`)
     # evaluate the expression
-    let evaluated = `expression`
+    let `evaluated` = `expression`
     # pop error variable from the stack
     static: discard errorVariableNames.pop()
     # return the evaluated result
-    evaluated
+    `evaluated`
 
-func unsafeError[T](_: Option[T]): ref CatchableError =
+func unsafeCatchableError[T](_: Option[T]): ref CatchableError =
   newException(ValueError, "Option is set to `none`")
 
-func unsafeError[T](_: ref T): ref CatchableError =
+func unsafeCatchableError[T](_: ref T): ref CatchableError =
   newException(ValueError, "ref is nil")
 
-func unsafeError[T](_: ptr T): ref CatchableError =
+func unsafeCatchableError[T](_: ptr T): ref CatchableError =
   newException(ValueError, "ptr is nil")
 
-func unsafeError[Proc: proc | iterator](_: Proc): ref CatchableError =
+func unsafeCatchableError[Proc: proc | iterator](_: Proc): ref CatchableError =
   newException(ValueError, "proc or iterator is nil")
 
 macro bindFailed*(expression: typed) =
@@ -49,4 +51,4 @@ macro bindFailed*(expression: typed) =
       # check that the error variable is in scope
       when compiles(`errorVariable`):
         # assign bind error to error variable
-        `errorVariable` = `expression`.unsafeError
+        `errorVariable` = `expression`.unsafeCatchableError

questionable/results.nim

@@ -123,6 +123,18 @@ template toOption*[T, E](value: Result[T, E]): ?T =
 
   value.option
 
+proc unsafeCatchableError*[T, E](value: Result[T, E]): ref CatchableError =
+  ## Returns the error from the Result, converted to `ref CatchableError` if
+  ## necessary. Behaviour is undefined when the result holds a value instead of
+  ## an error.
+  when E is ref CatchableError:
+    value.unsafeError
+  else:
+    when compiles($value.unsafeError):
+      newException(ResultFailure, $value.unsafeError)
+    else:
+      newException(ResultFailure, "Result is an error")
+
 proc errorOption*[T, E](value: Result[T, E]): ?E =
   ## Returns an Option that contains the error from the Result, if it has one.
 

testmodules/results/test.nim

@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ suite "result compatibility":
 
   type R = Result[int, string]
   let good = R.ok 42
-  let bad = R.err "error"
+  let bad = R.err "some error"
 
   test "|?, =? and .option work on other types of Result":
     check bad |? 43 == 43
@@ -681,3 +681,13 @@ suite "result compatibility":
       fail
     without b =? good:
       fail
+
+  test "without statement with error works on other type of Result":
+    without value =? bad, error:
+      check error of ResultFailure
+      check error.msg == "some error"
+
+  test "without statement with error works on Result[T, void]":
+    without value =? Result[int, void].err, error:
+      check error of ResultFailure
+      check error.msg == "Result is an error"