From 6ccb74419f931fe9e6adf665f282f577ef8ae0b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Spanbroek <mark@spanbroek.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:24:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Use ? instead of Option[] in tests

---
 testmodules/options/test.nim | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testmodules/options/test.nim b/testmodules/options/test.nim
index 558e758..fadbb44 100644
--- a/testmodules/options/test.nim
+++ b/testmodules/options/test.nim
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ suite "optionals":
       fail()
 
   test "=? binds and unpacks tuples returned from proc":
-    proc returnsTuple(): Option[tuple[name: string, id: int]] = some ("test", 1)
+    proc returnsTuple(): ?tuple[name: string, id: int] = some ("test", 1)
 
     if (a, b) =? returnsTuple():
       check a == "test"
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ suite "optionals":
       fail()
 
   test "=? binds and unpacks tuples returned from proc with unnamed fields":
-    proc returnsTuple(): Option[(string, int,)] = some ("test", 1,)
+    proc returnsTuple(): ?(string, int,) = some ("test", 1,)
 
     if (a, b,) =? returnsTuple():
       check a == "test"